half
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2017 9:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT when SORTOUT record
count is not zero
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:53:40 +0900, Minoru Massaki wrote:
>
>A customer wants to tell auto job schedu
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 17:53:40 +0900, Minoru Massaki wrote:
>
>A customer wants to tell auto job scheduling/auto operation system to take
>another/additional action by Non-Zero return code if generated record is
>non-rezo.
>Why we want to use DFSORT instead of small REXX program is following;
>If we
ords too
>
>
> >>Pretty trivial to write Rexx to set a return code based on file
> empty/Not empty.
>
> DFSORT already handles these scenarios.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Kolusu
> DFSORT Development
>
>
>
> From: Minoru Massaki <mmass...@gmail.com>
> To: IBM
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:35:58 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
Hmm, Sri, did we forget about the NULLOUT Parm/OPTION? :-)>
>
>Dale,
>
>NULLOUT is used to set a return code when there are NO records. OP wanted
>the opposite. He wants to set a return code when he has at least 1
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 09:14:01 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
>
>
>While I made this up, I have a hard time to imagine it did not happen that
>way. How else would can explain the weird logic behind COND= ?
>
Assembler mentality. It's the CC mask for a BC to branch around the next step.
>But then
Sounds like a CONd job to me
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Hunkeler
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 3:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [IBM-MAIN] AW: Re: How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT
> Why not just invert the COND= for the additional processing step?
> Instead of COND=(0,EQ,DFSORT), code COND=(0,NE,DFSORT)?
Back in the days when the need JCL was designed, people recognized the need for
conditional execution of a job step. However, it was already late in the
afternoon,
".
Thanks,
Kolusu
DFSORT Development
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> wrote on
04/15/2017 04:46:00 PM:
> From: Sri h Kolusu/Silicon Valley/IBM@IBMUS
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 04/15/2017 04:46 PM
> Subject: Re: How can I set Non-zero
>>I am guessing the OP framed the original question as "how do I set a
specific RC" and that is the sort of thing he searched for.
Charles,
"How do I" questions cannot be answered in application programming guide.
We have Smart DFSORT tricks page which shows you clever ways to use DFSORT
and
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 18:18:03 -0400, Charles Mills wrote:
>@Kolusu, I know how hard good documentation is. I have not looked at your
>documentation -- I am just citing the empirical evidence that the OP and
>@Lizette did not find the answer.
>
>I am guessing the OP framed the original question as
have been a start ...
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Sri h Kolusu
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 3:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT when SORTOUT
re
>>>Hmm, Sri, did we forget about the NULLOUT Parm/OPTION? :-)>
Dale,
NULLOUT is used to set a return code when there are NO records. OP wanted
the opposite. He wants to set a return code when he has at least 1 record,
so that it would trigger his additional processing.
>>Might I respectfully
se scenarios.
Thanks,
Kolusu
DFSORT Development
From: Minoru Massaki <mmass...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 04/15/2017 08:03 AM
Subject: How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT when SORTOUT
record count is not zero
Sent by:IBM Mainfra
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 11:00:57 -0700, Sri h Kolusu wrote:
>Minoru Massaki,
>
>It is quite simple to set a return code using COUNT operator. Here are a
>couple of ways setting the RC=4 . You can also set RC8 and RC12 too.
>
>//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
>//TOOLMSG DD SYSOUT=*
RT Development
From: Minoru Massaki <mmass...@gmail.com>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 04/15/2017 08:03 AM
Subject: How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT when SORTOUT
record count is not zero
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSER
ct: Re: How can I set Non-zero return code in
DFSORT when SORTOUT record count is not zero
I would say, no, you cannot have DFSORT do something like this. I am not
seeing anything the DFSORT manuals from IBM to allow the user to force DFSORT
to set codes other than it is already doing.
Better t
age-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Minoru Massaki
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 8:53 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT when SORTOUT record
> count is not ze
ailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> > Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 8:09 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT when SORTOUT
> record
> > count is not zero
> >
&g
; > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 8:03 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT when SORTOUT record
> > count is not zero
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm looking for a way to set Non-zero return code in DFSOR
RV.UA.EDU]
> > On Behalf Of Minoru Massaki
> > Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 8:03 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT when SORTOUT
> > record count is not zero
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > I'm looking
How can I set Non-zero return code in DFSORT when SORTOUT record
> count is not zero
>
> Hello
>
> I'm looking for a way to set Non-zero return code in DFSORT, when record count
> of SORTOUT is not zero.
>
> I know that setting non-zero return code when SORTOUT record cou
Hello
I'm looking for a way to set Non-zero return code in DFSORT, when record
count of SORTOUT is not zero.
I know that setting non-zero return code when SORTOUT record count is zero.
Your help would be highly appreciated.
--
全先 実 - Minoru Massaki (M*M)
E-mail: mmass...@gmail.com
22 matches
Mail list logo