ERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2019 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol above
the line?
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:47:23 +, Edgington, Jerry wrote:
>
>For Cobol, the DATA parm determine
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 19:47:23 +, Edgington, Jerry wrote:
>
>For Cobol, the DATA parm determines where the work storage is loaded.
>DATA(31) means it will attempt to loaded above the line. However, the program
>must also be at least RMODE(31) or ANY. And if during the compile, there is
>any
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol above
the line?
So everything looked fine, RENT, DATA(31), ALL31(off), RMODE(ANY)
But after doing an AMBLIST on the application load module, there was one module
in 24bit mode - everything else was 31.
So as I
gt;
> From: "Savor, Thomas (Alpharetta)"
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 20:25
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol
> above the line?
>
> DATA(31) - allocates worki
: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol above
the line?
DATA(31) - allocates working storage above-the-line
DATA(24) - allocates working storage below-the-line
ALL31 being OFF - is probably what is needed in a mixed environment.
ALL31 being ON - would say that you have no bel
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:41:43 -0700, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>So when I look at the compiler options, they have DATA(31)
>
>ALL31 in LE is OFF
>
>Only things I can think of for now.
>
>Lizette
The DATA option only applies if RENT is also specified. The COBOL RMODE option
can also affect where a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 9:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol above
the line?
So when I look at the
LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol
> above the line?
>
> DATA(24) may be their problem. But, you can’t change it if csects are
> statically linked that are RMODE 24.
>
> I’m fixing some issues like this now for ENT COBOL
DATA(24) may be their problem. But, you can’t change it if csects are
statically linked that are RMODE 24.
I’m fixing some issues like this now for ENT COBOL 4.2 where I work. The
routines are ALC.
Sent from my iPhone — small keyboarf, fat fungrs, stupd spell manglr. Expct
mistaks
> On
Use DATA(31)
Thanks,
Tom Savor
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Doug
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2019 8:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Are there compiler options to move Working Storage in Cobol above
What version of COBOL?
.
On Jan 24, 2019, at 20:06, Lizette Koehler wrote:
A friend of mine is having a bit of problem with a Cobol program. WS is about
7M in size below the line. This creates the perfect environment for S878-10
abends.
Is there a compiler option that would move WS above the
11 matches
Mail list logo
