Many thanks to all those who responded to my queryI've got it
working now. The list comes through again. ;-)
DJ
Roy, Bruce wrote:
Dave,
Here's the RSCS definition for our MVS link where 1C0 is the address of
our
CTCTA:
LINKDEF XMVS TYPE NJE LINE 1C0 Q PRI DP 4 NOAST
Hi Seb,
The VM/ESA-based online tutorial was removed in 2004.
It was based on the book, CMS Primer.
There is a z/VM V5.1-based CMS Primer in the online library.
http://www.vm.ibm.com/library/
Here's the PDF of the CMS Primer,
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/hcsd6b00.pdf
You can also
I have a question that pertains to performance.
We currently have 3390 mod 3 defined volumes. The customer requires a
larger mini disk size than what will fit on a 3390 mod 3. We are planning
to create 3390 mod 9s for their larger mini disks. Would someone explain
the performance hit that
We currently have 3390 mod 3 defined volumes. The customer requires a
larger mini disk size than what will fit on a 3390 mod 3. We are
planning
to create 3390 mod 9s for their larger mini disks.
If it's a CMS user, use SFS. That's exactly what it's for, and all those
restrictions are pretty
David, would it be possible for you to collect some performance data on
the i/o improvements you're seeing there? Perhaps some CP MONITOR data
that we could analyze? It would be nice to know if PAV is really
something that Linux on z/VM sites should really be taking advantage of.
What was that
Presently the application is split onto several disks. The data is to be
combined onto one disk. The data is a NOMAD database.
The DASD is on DS6800.
I thought PAV was not an option for VM. Does z/VM 5.2 support PAV?
I had not considered SFS as a possibility... SFS would add more overhead.
Do you
also still have a 601?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original
Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Bruce Hayden
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006
12:04 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM I/O Concurrency
We still
Wasn't that the one with the single read/write head on an arm that would
do a seek to the platter before it started going after the rec. If
I remember correctly, CE's would normally keep a big pan underneath to
catch the constant drippings of hydraulic oil. I remember something
like that, altho
Title: Message
'fraid not! They had one at John Deere in Atlantic,
Iowa. I was a field engineer at the time and that was one of my accounts. It was
glass enclosed and you could watch the access arm move.
Mike Myers
- Original Message -
From:
Huegel, Thomas
To:
VM supports PAV for guests. I don't think it does, or needs to, support
it natively.
PAV is a chargable feature on the DS6800. I elected not to buy it on
our DS6800.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/25/2006 12:17 PM
Presently the application is split onto several disks.
It is correct.
We got rid of ISPF long ago (we had only installed
it for the NDM product to begin with) but we do use
RMS for the tape library.
Shimon
On 25 Apr 2006 at 16:24, Lee Stewart wrote:
Hi all...I must be getting old, but
I seem to remember not too long ago a discussion
Thanks Marcy Shimon...
Marcy Cortes wrote:
Yes, you are correct. We have several systems with just rmsonly
DFSMS installed for 3494 support. See the program directory for it for
it. http://www.vm.ibm.com/related/dfsms
Marcy Cortes
Lee Stewart, Senior SE
Sirius Enterprise Systems
12 matches
Mail list logo
