On 7/5/06, Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Rob, DCSS stood (and still stands) for discontiguous saved segments
I stand corrected. Rob
There are more technical errors already in chapter 1.1
Example 1:
A segment is a 1 MB portion of real storage as defined
No:
A segment is a 1 MB portion of virtual storage ...
Example 2:
A DCSS enables z/VM to load such data into a designated segment of
physical memory
Wrong again, the pages
Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think the full name would be then? We have Named Saved
Systems and Discontiguous Shared Segments as far as I know.
Um, no. They've been Discontiguous Saved Segments since I was but a wee lad.
Remember, they're *saved* but not necessarily
On Tuesday, 07/04/2006 at 02:29 AST, Phil Smith III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a good introduction to using DCSS and the XIP2 file system
Using Discontiguous Shared Segments and XIP2 Filesystems With Oracle
Database 10g on Linux for IBM System z
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 20:11:43 +0200, Eginhard Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But a very simple solution could also be to just use the PRINT command,
e.g. 'PIPE VMC PERFSVM PRINT USER (TO BUELENS'
and then read the spool file to disk and process it. Not as nice as gett
ing
the information in
Cross-posted to ibmvm and vse-l. Sorry for duplications.
New Hobbit client packages are available for z/VM, VM/ESA and z/VSE and
VSE/ESA.
For VM the client doesn't add much new function, but includes
information about graphing some of the information from the client using
the integrated
On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 20:11:43 +0200, Eginhard Jaeger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But a very simple solution could also be to just use the PRINT command,
e.g. 'PIPE VMC PERFSVM PRINT USER (TO BUELENS'
and then read the spool file to disk and process it. Not as nice as
getting
the information in
One of the management types near me is concerned about TCPIP buffer
overrun security exposure on our ZVM 5.2 Z890 system.
Should I be concerned with buffer overrun security exposures? If I
should not be concerned, how would I go about giving comfort to the
concerned management types?
1) The
On: Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 04:15:04PM -0400,David Boyes Wrote:
} One of the management types near me is concerned about TCPIP buffer
} overrun security exposure on our ZVM 5.2 Z890 system.
} Should I be concerned with buffer overrun security exposures? If I
} should not be concerned, how would
You want him to say that VM TCPIP has a built-in firewall or some such?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rich Greenberg
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 3:41 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
10 matches
Mail list logo
