Very strange -- I can see this new link from my Mac, but not from the Ban
k's PC. On my Mac, the
page at http://www.vm.ibm.com/library contains a link
z/VM V5.2 publications updated May 2006 to http://www.vm.ibm.com/pubs
/index.html.
This lists the 18 new manuals. On my PC, the link z/VM
On 10/2/06, Mike Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WRWrite link. A write link is established unless another user has an
existing link (any mode) to the disk. If the write link is denied, a
read link is established unless another user has an existing
exclusive mode link for
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Kluger
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 2:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Flexes on VMware
Hi, Did anybody realized the Flex ES on VMware solution and
have any
Jim Bohnsack wrote:
In particular, I depend on using RTM to monitor for high cpu
utilization and the high cpu usage userids.
I take it you have some issues with FC USRLIMIT * %CPU or FC LIMIT
NORMCPU? They're not quite like RTM, but they seem to be enough to get
my attention at times.
On Saturday, 09/30/2006 at 03:13 EST, Alan Ackerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The bookshelf may not have changed, but the bookshelf (.bks) FILE will
have
many changes.
I have learned that the Softcopy Librarian is dependent on files that we
only create when we create a CD. Since we don't
Title: Question about VM crash
Is it possible for VM (z/VM 5.2 z890) to crash and not leave a trace?
Nothing in the hardware (HMC) messages.
Nothing in the PROP log file.
And no DUMP in OPERATNS rdr.
I am a little confused, I can't recall ever seeing this happen before.
I don't think
Title: Message
Ifthe LPR ispulledout from under VM this will
happen. A sign of this would be all the open CONSOLE files will all be in
HOLD status.
-Original Message-From: The IBM z/VM
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Huegel,
ThomasSent: Monday,
What about OPERATORs console log?
Huegel, Thomas wrote:
Is it possible for VM (z/VM 5.2 z890) to crash and not leave a trace?
Nothing in the hardware (HMC) messages.
Nothing in the PROP log file.
And no DUMP in OPERATNS rdr.
I am a little confused, I can't recall ever seeing this happen
Another colleague suggested there might not be enough DUMP space to hold
a dump. What are the results of QUERY DUMP?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 12:34 PM
To:
Title: RE: Question about VM crash
This is waht I see, note the 14 min. pause between messages.. and Q CPLEVEL tells me the IPL took place at 16:59:25.
16:56:01 VSEA04M KNCVMP01: HCPATR040E DEVICE 0E0C DOES NOT EXIST
17:10:17 PROP KNCVMP01: PROP running with routing table PROP RTABLE A5
Title: RE: Question about VM crash
q dump
DASD 0411 dump unit CP IPL pages 60750
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU]On
Behalf Of Stracka, James (GTI)
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 11:44 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:
a Q CPLOAD will respond
with how z/VM was last loaded (it will reply with what module from
what disk if it was IPL'd cleanly thru a load/activate, or it will
reply with the abend type that caused a re-IPL to be initiated).
The Q DUMP will tell you
right then how much space is needed to dump the
AFAIK, when dump space would be full, CP would not restart itself after an
abend.
But, there is also OPERSYMP that logs problems. With next commands, you
can list symptom summaries.
- VMLINK OPERSYMP 191
- VMLINK MAINT 193
- VIEWSYM (or is it VIEWSYMP?)
Kris,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
The BKS and BKI files exist. The BKS file is used by IBM's library server
to create page http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/hcsh2a80. The BKI file is used to perform
searches from that page. SOMEONE created them.
Today the missing link has reappeared -- possibly
I hope that this list may assist or point me in the right
direction for this problem.
I have inherited an incomplete project from a coworker that
is longer with the school. Currently we have a Z/VM 4.4 system in a separate LPAR
called TECH, that was to be used to convert an set of array
On Monday, 10/02/2006 at 01:04 EST, McKown, John
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not familar with an MP3000. However, that symptom will occur on a
zSeries machine if you attempt to IPL z/VSE (or z/OS) on an IFL engine
and not
a standard engine. Is it possible that the TECH LPAR is defined
I was under the impression we had only a one engine CPU and no IFL. But
how can I be sure? Don't you have to configure the LPAR in some way to
use the IFL and can I not see if it is set to IFL?
Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597
Title: RE: Question about VM crash
Thanks Kris, Kurt, and others.
I was able to identify the problem as a PRG001 but thanks to SFPURGER (damned automation -:( ) the dump was purged from OPERATNS rdr .. I fixed that problem but I'll have to wait (hopefully forever) to get another dump.
Tom
In that case, let me offer you another code fragment that you might want
to put in FCONX PROFILE in VMSYS:4VMPTK40.PERFTK.CUSCONFIG.:
FC PROCESS ERR * 'USL317A' D RER LAFLAMME CPMSGN
FC PROCESS ERR * 'PER315A' D RER OPERATOR CPMSGN
FC PROCESS ERR * 'USL317A' D RER OPERATOR CPMSGN
Use your own
After doing some further reading, it looks
like I am confused with the use of the word LPAR.
I am used to the old days meaning of LPAR
being the equivalent of VM to use machine resources to emulate multiple
machines.
Now it looks like LPAR means one to one machine
emulation, ie one LPAR
You can define as many LPARs as your machine type allows. Each LPAR will
have (one or more) standard CPUs or (one or more) IFL CPUs assigned to
it but not both. A CPU can be assigned to more than one LPAR. If you
wish to use both standard and IFL CPUs you must have at least 2 LPARs
defined.
Thanks Mark. I have found the answer on the MP3000 in the configuration
section of my LPARs. The TECH LPAR is marked as LINUX only. My next
question is I think that I still don't have an IFL. Can the general
processor be shared between these 2 LPARs with the TECH LPAR marked as
Linux only? What
On Monday, 10/02/2006 at 04:41 EST, Tom Duerbusch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not on a z9z/890...
Industry-standard N_Port ID Virtualization (NPIV) on the z9 is needed if
you want to apply zoning and LUN masking (FC access controls) to virtual
machines and/or LPARs just as they are for
On Oct 2, 2006, at 4:36 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
I could telephone each of you, but I actually DO have a life,
contrary to
rumor.
Only because Chucky is too short to reach the pedals.
Adam
24 matches
Mail list logo
