Hello Everyone,
We
have High Level Assembler for z/VM and for VSE. The product number is the same
for both 5696-234.
Can
some one explain the billing process?
We are being charged two times for this,
seemly, one product.
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
And so it begins,
Management has decided after a year of thinking that the era of the
mainframe is over here. The final I's are being doted, T's being
crossed on a monster contract to replace our main application with a
Computer Off The Shelf product. I love that acronym. COST or costs more is
Hi Steve,
By coincidence I recently used your county's online tax parcel web
application, loved it, and was pleased to see it ran on VM.
Sorry to hear it's going elsewhere.
This e-mail, including any attachments, may be confidential,
Title: RE: Any way to stop PROP from logging 'select messages'?
Don't have HL Assembler here. Anyway I think I would make my mods to DMSPOP (PROP Mainline) or DMSPOA (Action routine that does the logging). The messages themselves are absolutly useless. They give a GRAF address that is
Steve_Domarski
Wrote:
And so it begins,
Management has decided after a year of thinking that the era of
the
mainframe is over here.
I think it is not just beginning but
is well under way in most places. Part of this is a sort of 'religious
belief' in the conventional wisdom that
On Monday, 11/06/2006 at 10:40 CST, Huegel, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On further analysis it looks like DMSPOA uses standard CMS I/O ie.
FSWRITE .. I
think a little SVC 202 trap might be the easiest and safest, and most
flexiable
way around this.
FSREAD (RDBUF) and FSWRITE (WRBUF)
Having been there myself, your best bet is to find yourself a new
position ASAP. If they still need your services, they may be able to get
you for a few hours a week at a nice hourly rate. Don't be a victim of
their bad decision making - take advantage of it in every possible way.
Ray Mrohs
Steve,
Your email is very interesting. Here, there are two issues that are
determining the future of mainframe and client/server Open systems
environment (ie UNIX).
The first issue is the philosophical issue that it can be done
cheaper on client/server. Management refuses to look at the
I have two modules that are in use in some test processes that we ran a
while back and I am now interested in using them in a production process.
Unfortunately, I don't have the footprints to track them back to whoever
wrote/owns them. The vmarc files that contain them are dated 03/30/98.
If you
One reason for not looking at the TCO of the client/server setup
is that they do not have those figures.
At some of my old clients, the largest unknown cost was the
client/server pieces and parts. They would estimate how many and how
much.
A large Publishing company in NE
Not wanting to mention the politics but it is a huge mistaken belief that
privatizing government is efficient use of tax dollars. Not in this case.
In the short and long term me and my associate could have rewritten the
application using freeware from any number of platforms in the same time
This would be an option if I wasn't knee deep into building a house in a
real estate market that is falling. A house I really like and would enjoy
living in. To go anywhere means leaving the area and potentially Florida.
The biggest hurt would be a 50% salary cut that would be expected starting
We get nothing but complements from our public web application. Some
consider it the bests in Florida but management is caught up in the fact
that we are not main stream. Yet I can do anything they ask with in a
reasonable time frame.
10 years and 21 million delivered property pages its still
On Nov 6, 2006, at 1:26 PM, Thomas Kern wrote:
I have two modules that are in use in some test processes that we
ran a
while back and I am now interested in using them in a production
process.
Unfortunately, I don't have the footprints to track them back to
whoever
wrote/owns them. The
On top of that is back up power supply. We are increasing our UPS
and other back up power supplies over the next several years. They
wont look at what increasing the servers are doing to other requirements.
They simply see the cost of the mainframe is x.They never see
the cost of
I think they were written by Ross Patterson while he was at VM Software
Inc., later Sterling Software, now CA. My copies are of earlier vintage,
and neither the EXEC nor MODULE have copyright or other identifying
information.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
I had already looked at the IBM Downloads page but could not find them. I
f
they are part of another package there, they are not listed in the primar
y
description.
/Thomas Kern
/301-903-2211
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 13:54:34 -0600, Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t
wrote:
I think these are on the VM
- Original Message -
From:
Steve_Domarski/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: Another long slow decline.
... Yet I can do anything they ask with in a
reasonable time frame.
... It's been a joy to build and maintain...
...
If you believe you'll be cut, as you seem to say elsewhare in this thread
:
I now find my self in Catch 22. I can't leave since I make good money
after 20 years on the job. The vendor takes over most of my skill set in
a
few months and I'm left waiting for the cut over to see my job cut as wel
That's been my experience as well. Before working here at a state-funded
U, I spent some 12 years in the private sector, at 3 large
corporations, one financial, one telecom, and one energy. The degree of
non-nonchalance in spending huge amounts of $$$ compared to the
shoe-string budgets here
Sterling / Ross Paterson definitely distributed them:
http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind9904L=vmesa-lT=0F=S=P=31465
http://tinyurl.com/y2sev4
Original Message
Subject: Re: PIPEMD5 and RXMD5 modules ?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, November 06, 2006 2:43 pm
Does the soft IPL done following an ABEND act the same when choosing a module
to load as if a SHUTDOWN REIPL (without any parameters or options) had been
entered? That is, will it choose the module that was last IPLed rather than the
one that currently has CPLOAD as its filename?
Regards,
On Nov 6, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Thomas Kern wrote:
I had already looked at the IBM Downloads page but could not find
them. If
they are part of another package there, they are not listed in the
primary
description.
You're right. Ours must have come from somewhere else. I see no
identifying
I just love GOOGLE.
VMESA-L Archives -- April 1999 (#304)
http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind9904L=vmesa-lT=0F=S=P=31465
Check out the PIPEMD5 and *RXMD5* packages at http : / / www . vm .
sterling . com / library / . I think they ' ll do what you want . *...*
I agree with Colin in that the decline in mainframe usage is partly the
herd wisdom picked up from the seatback airline magazines starting
around 1990 +/-. The other part is that IBM has, once again, shot
itself in the foot with software. There is a mindset in IBM that goes
back, in my
25 matches
Mail list logo
