Yes, but your VSE guest might not like it. :)
If you know what you are doing (on the VSE side) and have several VSE guests then there are some
benefits from having each guest use different labels fort their disks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you change DOSRES SYSWK1 labels using ICKDSF
If you DEDICATE the volumes to the VSE machines or use the MDISK DEVNO
option, you won't have to worry about duplicate volume labels.
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Main: (866)569-7378
Cell: (414)491-6001
Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2007 - Green Bay, WI
- Original Message -
How many sites are using SSL for end-to-end encryption of TN3270
sessions? I am looking at SSLSERV as well as external appliances such as
Visara's. We will provide this for about 800 concurrent CMS users at
peak times.
My main concerns are:
1. reliability and proven load-handling capability
2.
On Thursday, 12/21/2006 at 06:35 EST, Gregg Reed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd second that. The PTK is great at what it does and while I was doing
an
extensive comparison a year ago, it's where I'd point operators and RTM
familiar folk to, it is a huge upgrade to RTM, but it takes an FMR/not
If your under vm why change then, just have them come up off line
or do not have then accessed in that userid
are they dedicated or mini disk
anyway you can change them with ditto also, DID command
Daniel
On Thursday, 12/21/2006 at 10:09 EST, Mrohs, Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How many sites are using SSL for end-to-end encryption of TN3270
sessions? I am looking at SSLSERV as well as external appliances such as
Visara's. We will provide this for about 800 concurrent CMS users at
peak times.
However, if you're going
to take her out on the Autobahn and redline it, you gotta have 'em.
(Otherwise how would you know you're redlining it? Remember, the CPU
doesn't make noise as you rev it up.)
Requirement! Requirement!
(Find some of those Sequent guys you bought up. *They* do
Hi Larry. It is possible that the 2.4 vm system ddr does not support it. It
does work on z/VM 3.1 and later DDR.
For testing in your VM userid you must use LOADPARM and not PARM. I kept my
tape volid so I had to IPL twice to get past the volid. The rest of the tape
should then hold the DDR
OK, I give up. Why is Warning: writing such code yourself is non-trivial
! a litotes?
I looked up litotes in Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litot
es. I can see how not non-
trivial would be a litotes, but why is non-trivial?
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 20:51:07 -0500, Phil Smith III [EMAIL
I concur and indeed I left info w/support how I believed a CPC with
dedicated and shared resources should be displayed. my rational, so be it.
I don't think its universally accepted and I'm not about making it so. I
coded my own macro to represent what I think PR/SM and Redbooks describe,
across
We are not using it yet, but we have a project to encrypt all TN3270 traf
fic (and eventually other
traffic) to mainframes. As usual here, we are doing z/OS first, using wha
tever is built in to z/OS
these days. (Target is 4Q2007.) z/VM would come next, so we have been tes
ting the VM SSL server
Be careful about what you read in Wikipedia. From what I have read, its
quality assurance is sometimes questionable.
The opposite of non-trivial would be complex. In this case, saying
something is non-trivial is an understated way to stress its complexity;
hence, it is a litotes.
The Meriam
We've been running DB/2 for VM since Release 6.1. We're currently on DB/2 7.3
under z/VM 4.4. Our current LASTING GLOBALV is 137 lines long for SQLPROD, and
it doesn't have any duplicates in it.
We do not have the SQLINIT step in our PROFILE EXEC for any of the databases.
We also do not
Remember that a lot of assgns are done in STDLABEL, STDLABUP and so on that
mades references to DOSRES and SYSWK1. Mainly are POWER and ICCF.
___
Carlos Bodra
zSeries System Programmer
São Paulo - SP - Brazil
-Mensagem original-
De: The
Ed,
LASTING GLOBALV is normally cleared of duplicate entries at IPL CMS time. For
them not to be cleared, could there be undisplayed characters making them
unique? An Explicit GLOBALV INIT should also clear the duplicates. Other than
that, the duplicates could be being created by the SQL
I am surprized. but indeed, each time a GLOBALV SETP or PUTP is issued, it
is written in LASTING GLOBALV, even if the value is the same as before. So
yes indeed a careless use of SETP/PUTP can cause huge LASTING GLOBALV
files.
But, GLOBALV INIT is supposed to cleanup the file, removing all but
Schuh, Richard wrote:
The opposite of non-trivial would be complex.
Really?
No, it would be trivial.
For completeness sake, the proof is left as an exercise for the reader.
Unfortunately, the margin of this email is too small to contain it.
-- db
Last I knew, SYSPROF EXEC, which is by default executed during an IPL of
CMS, does **not** issue a GLOBALV INIT. That came as a surprise to me in
the mid-1980's when a developer reported that their LASTING GLOBALV and
even SESSION GLOBALVs were not being cleared.
I solved that here by
Unless: the server would have its A-disk R/O when GLOBALV INIT is
done,
or, the A-disk is changed after the GLOBALV INIT (I obtained a fix
precisely for this problem in the the DGTSRVxx servers of DFSMS).
Kris,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
Kris,
That's it. The 191 disk for my DB/2
See line number 173 of SYSPROF EXEC:
'GLOBALV INIT'
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 3:23 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Huge
Or not complex (or easy or ...)
That should have read The opposite of trivial ... - the non- did not
belong in the sentence.
Any time the proof is left for the reader, it will be non-trivial. The
professors or authors work all of the trivial ones for you.
-Original Message-
From: The
We are running DB/2 for VM 7.4 on z/VM 4.4 at service level 0501.
Today I noticed that the LASTING GLOBALV file on all three of my
servers is HUGE. (SQLPROD's is 47,000+ lines and 276 blocks) It
is full of the same settings over and over again. For example:
SQL/DS DBNAMESQLPROD
SQL/DS
Do you by any chance run CA's VM:DB/Suite or IBM's Control Center with your DB2
databases?
JR
JR (Steven) Imler
CA
Senior Software Engineer
Tel: +1 703 708 3479
Fax: +1 703 708 3267
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you by any chance run CA's VM:DB/Suite or IBM's Control
Center with your DB2 databases?
JR
Hi JR,
No, everything is roll yer own here. We have been running
since the late 1980's (SQL/DS 2.1 if I remember correctly). At
that time there were no cool tools like the ones you
IBM VM BATCH uses Diag D4 to set an Alternate ID for task IDs, so in
some ways the task machine is masquerading as a different userid.
The BATCH SUBMIT command accepts an ALTID option which is used by that
Diag D4, but the job owner is still the actual job submitter.
The DGROOLY EXEC runs on
On Thursday, 12/21/2006 at 04:34 PST, Don Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBM VM BATCH uses Diag D4 to set an Alternate ID for task IDs, so in
some ways the task machine is masquerading as a different userid.
That is, how can I determine what my ORIGINID would be if I sent a spool
file to
26 matches
Mail list logo
