I have just updated the requirements web page with all the requirements
I have.
http://www.vse2pdf.com/WAVV2008/wavv2008reqvoteresults.htm
If you submitted a requirement, please verify the information. Everyone
else, please review the requirements. If you think a requirement should
be tweaked,
Hey guys,
I have a question about the QUEUE function in REXX. I created an exec
that uses the QUEUE function to XEDIT the operator log issue a ALL /
INVALID and put the results into a file:
Queue XEDIT FN FT FM
Queue ALL /INVALID
Queue SET SHADOW OFF
Queue PUT *
Ah, that makes sense! The XEDIT command causes the execution of the
queues commands. Works great! Thanks Bob.
Tim
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Levad
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:03 AM
To:
Colin Allinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:-
I have a question about the QUEUE function in REXX. I created an exec
that uses the QUEUE function to
XEDIT the operator log issue a ALL / INVALID and put the results into
a file:
Queue XEDIT FN FT FM
Queue ALL /INVALID
Queue SET SHADOW OFF
Tim Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :-
I have a question about the QUEUE function in REXX. I created an exec
that uses the QUEUE function to
XEDIT the operator log issue a ALL / INVALID and put the results into
a file:
Queue XEDIT FN FT FM
Queue ALL /INVALID
Queue SET SHADOW OFF
Queue
Thanks Colin!
As I said, I knew there were better ways to do this. I was just re-using
an old exec and just wondered how the queue functions were working. This
is a MUCH better solution.
Thanks again, Tim
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL
Hans -
The VSWITCH failover support attempts to initialize each of the devices
defined for the virtual switch. If one attempt is successful the others
are initialized as backups.
In 5.2.0, if all devices are marked as broken manual intervention (SET
VSWITCH CONNECT) is required to
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Tim Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Queue XEDIT FN FT FM
Queue ALL /INVALID
Queue SET SHADOW OFF
Queue PUT * = INVALID A1
Queue QQ
Since we've started to answer unasked questions already... I don't
think there's a need for your SET SHADOW OFF either.
Do
If you really wanted to get fancy with it, you could execute the
SENDFILE from within the same Pipe:
PIPE fn ft fm locate /INVALID/ | fn INVALID A3 | hole | append
literal fn 'INVALID A3 | state nodetails | spec /EXEC SENDFILE/1 w1.3
nw /userid/ nw | command
By making the filemode A3, the
In a zvm530 shop, last week we were testing this at a client. We simulated a
cable pull by forcibly DETaching a set RDEVs from the controller machine. Two
great things happened:
1. it automatically recovered to the other set of devices (seemed to be like a
second or so)
2. 1 minute later the
Pipelines is good, but another solution that hasn't been mentioned is:
XEDIT fm ft fm (PROFILE myname
and put the commands you are QUEUEing into myname XEDIT.
This technique is especially useful in KEDIT (a clone of XEDIT for the PC
)
where Pipelines is not an option.
Brian Nielsen
On Tue,
I am trying to build a pipe to do the following:
1. copy records from a stem into a file
2. append an existing file after the above file
I don't seem to be having any success with it and would appreciate any
good example or some direction.
Thanks in advance
Lionel B. Dyck,
How about:
'PIPE',
'| STEM x',
'| APPEND FILE NAME A',
'| OUT FILE A'
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on 04/15/2008
12:43:51 PM:
I am trying to build a pipe to do the following:
1. copy records from a stem
We have a REXX exec that executes the following:
VSCREEN WAITREAD SCSN1_A
We inserted a TRACE and we're receiving:
+++ RC(4) +++
Before the TRACE was added we were receiving:
326 +++do j = 3 to waitread.0
110 +++ call read_vscreen
DMSREX476E Error 41 running
Thanks - that worked and I learned something new. I wasn't aware of the
APPEND (must have over looked it)
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering
925-926-5332 (8-473-5332) | E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: lbdyck
Ooo ooo, Mr. Cah-terr!
/* REXX */
'PIPE STEM MYSTEM. | FIRST FILE A | SECOND FILE A'
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Lionel B. Dyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am trying to build a pipe to do the following:
1. copy records from a stem into a file
2. append an existing file after the
On Tuesday, 04/15/2008 at 01:55 EDT, David Kreuter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a zvm530 shop, last week we were testing this at a client. We
simulated a
cable pull by forcibly DETaching a set RDEVs from the controller
machine. Two
great things happened:
1. it automatically recovered to
Won't this put the stem records *after* the original contents
of SECOND FILE? The OP said:
2. append an existing file after the above file
which I understand to mean that the stem records must be
*before* the original contents.
Shimon
Original message
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008
You have to stay after class. Suppose the stem had entries of 1, 2, and
3 and the already existing file had records 4 and 5. Following the two
steps in sequence, the first creates a new file having records 1, 2, and
3; the second appends records 4 and 5 to the newly created file. the
result is two
Has anyone developed a xedit command similar to the comment z/os ispf
command (from the cbt tape) that they would be willing to share?
The ISPF Comment command syntax is something like this:
Comment comment-text
with an A (for after) or B (for before) on the desired line within the
ISPF edit
Code CMDCALL VSCREEN and you'll get an error message explaining it all.
(I bet you run with ADDRESS COMMAND (as it should), what causes
VSCREEN not to issue error messages; by adding CMDCALL you still have
the safety of ADDRESS COMMAND, but you'll get error messages.
2008/4/15, Flores,
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Lionel B. Dyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks - that worked and I learned something new. I wasn't aware of the
APPEND (must have over looked it)
You might also step into multi-stream plumbing with this example:
PIPE (end \)
\ stem x.
| i: fanin
|
My location notwithstanding, English IS my mother tongue,
not a second language. :-)
Shimon
Original message
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:12:28 -0400
From: Richard Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: pipe question
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I should take an English as a
I don't know about what anyone did, the best I
can offer is my change all of these lines to comments
macro.
Shimon
Original message
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:57:46 -0700
From: Lionel B. Dyck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: comment xedit macro ?
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
I have an XEDIT macro that operates as a prefix command. It turns specified
lines into comments. It has the ability to turn blocks of lines into comments,
as well. Here is an example using a snippet of code from SMTPNOTE EXEC:
Before - note the asterisks in the prefix area. That is the synonym
Thanks Mary Ellen. I'm not sure why the devices were detached from the
VSWITCH and in a FREE state. I did another test with only one OSA card on a
TEST VSWITCH and physically unplugged the cable. The device stayed attached
to the VSWITCH and the VSWITCH went to not ready state. After 5 minutes I
On Tuesday, 04/15/2008 at 11:51 EDT, Hans Rempel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I will check with the operators to see if they brought the CHPID offline
or
tried to reset the OSA card from the HMC. If not then the reset of the
routers appeared to be more disruptive to the OSA card and maybe it
27 matches
Mail list logo
