Re: SHARE 111 Presentations on linuxvm.org

2008-08-29 Thread Michael MacIsaac
Mark, > I've uploaded a whole boatload of Linux and z/VM-related presentations from SHARE 111 ... An amazing array of presentations. This is a great resource. Thanks for your tireless work! "Mike MacIsaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (845) 433-7061

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 08/29/2008 at 05:55 EDT, "Schuh, Richard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Was the last thing the ISFC over TCPIP? Wishful thinking. :-) No, it was a DDR stage, along with FTPGET and FTPPUT. Alan Altmark z/VM Development IBM Endicott

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Fran Hensler
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:06:04 -0400 Hughes, Jim said: >When you issue the put command from the command line(no vmftp), what is >the text of the 550 message? > Command: put NO_INST.TXT NO_INST_2008-08-29_15-57-07_FRI.txt >>>SITE VARrecfm 500 'SITE VARrecfm': command not understood >>>PORT 10,1,72,3

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Hughes, Jim
When you issue the put command from the command line(no vmftp), what is the text of the 550 message? Jim Hughes 603-271-5586 "Its kind of fun to do the impossible." (Walt Disney) =>-Original Message- =>From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Fran Hensler
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:32:22 -0400 Hughes, Jim said: >Hi Fran, > >What is the exact response string you receive when doing the PUT and the >target system does not have room to store the file? > I'm getting return code -5 (only on PUT) and stem OUTPUT has 0 lines. But when I try to make a director

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Schuh, Richard
The last thing that we let George do. Regards, Richard Schuh > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hughes, Jim > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 2:57 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: VMFTP Return Code -5 > >

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Hughes, Jim
I don't understand your question, sorry. Jim Hughes 603-271-5586 "Its kind of fun to do the impossible." (Walt Disney) =>-Original Message- =>From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On =>Behalf Of Schuh, Richard =>Sent: Friday, August 2

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Schuh, Richard
Was the last thing the ISFC over TCPIP? Regards, Richard Schuh > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 2:52 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 08/29/2008 at 05:42 EDT, "Hughes, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > VMFTP is not another FTP program. It is a wrapper or a front end for > FTP. It eats up all terminal input and output. > > Maybe a change is in order to cope with a "550" message code. It would be an interesting exerci

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Hughes, Jim
VMFTP sets a return code of -5 when it finds these strings immediately following the 3 digit numeric message id in the beginning of the response from the server: "Invalid" "Ambiguous" "Local file not" So if your string was "550 Local file not stored. Space not available.", there is the reason fo

SHARE 111 Presentations on linuxvm.org

2008-08-29 Thread Mark Post
Cross-posted to ibm-main, ibmvm, and linux-390. I've uploaded a whole boatload of Linux and z/VM-related presentations from SHARE 111 in San Jose to the linuxvm.org website. (About 53 so far) http://linuxvm.org/Present/#share111 Lots of good stuff there. Thanks to all the presenters for giv

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Hughes, Jim
Hi Fran, What is the exact response string you receive when doing the PUT and the target system does not have room to store the file? Jim Hughes 603-271-5586 "Its kind of fun to do the impossible." (Walt Disney) =>-Original Message- =>From: The IBM z/VM Ope

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Fran Hensler
I have found the reason for the return code -5. Although it is supposed to mean 'subcommand syntax error' that is not my case. The problem is that there is not enough space on the target. I'm doing the ftp to a network drive which has a limit of 30 MB for each user. The user in question has use

Re: question to backup of osa-icc settings

2008-08-29 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 08/29/2008 at 10:53 EDT, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to backup OSA-ICC settings to an ftp server. the HMC has one > address in the company's lan and the other adapter connected to the > support elements lan. The support elements have no connection to the > co

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Shedlock, George
ISTR that you might get this if the total destination file name (including all of the directory names) would exceed 255 characters. George George Shedlock Jr AEGON Information Technology AEGON USA 502-560-3541 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Request for information: Installation Summary Cards

2008-08-29 Thread Ron Schmiedge
Hi Alan, I would not call myself a newbie, since I became a VM system programmer in 1979 with BSEPP. But after a VM/XA install in 1986 I wandered in the MVS wilderness until I returned to VM support for a VM/VSE shop in 1999. VSE needed much more TLC than VM to get it wokring well, (previous "owne

Re: SPOOL/PAGE and cylinder zero

2008-08-29 Thread Stephen Frazier
I remember IBM sent out an APAR for VM/SP to fix the problem. I would hope the code has been included in every VM since then. Bill Holder wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:54:51 -0400, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Look in the archives of this listserver and you will find z/VM Develo

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Fran Hensler
Romney - If the local file does not exist I get this: VMFTPM401I put TEST.FILE SAP041_2008-08-29_05-32-34_FRI.txt Local file not found or cannot be accessed. If the remote file exists it should be overwritten. That leave 'subcommand syntax error' as the reason for -5. I can't see th

Re: TSAFVM

2008-08-29 Thread Marcy Cortes
Yes! Great idea Richard! That sure would be useful :)! Happy long weekend all. Marcy "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Romney White
Fran: That return code is set if there is a syntax error in the command or if t he file does not exist. Romney

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Fran Hensler
HELP VMFTP shows that return code -5 indicates a "subcommand syntax error". Most of the time this exact statement works. If you see a syntax error then please point it out. The file is being sent to a Microsoft server: VM TCP/IP FTP Level 3A0 Connecting to 10.1.72.40, port 21

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Schuh, Richard
Aren't those "self explanatory"? Regards, Richard Schuh > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fran Hensler > Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 8:23 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: VMFTP Return Code -5 > > I s

Re: Request for information: Installation Summary Cards

2008-08-29 Thread Schuh, Richard
All you would need would be a larger sheet of paper. Regards, Richard Schuh > > 3. If you could make changes to them, what would they be? > > Perhaps make the print a bit bigger for my aging > eyes..but then it wouldn't fit on a single sheet of paper:-) > > > -- > DJ > > V/Soft

Re: Request for information: Installation Summary Cards

2008-08-29 Thread Jim Bohnsack
Mike made a very good point in this statement: (I have installed a number of systems in the past, so I can't say if they are appropriate for a first-time installer.) It would be a good idea if the two one-sheet installation summary cards are intended for the non-VM experienced person who is ju

Re: TSAFVM

2008-08-29 Thread Schuh, Richard
Wouldn't be necessary if we had ISFC over TCP/IP. We could even expand the definition of "Collection" to include remote systems. Regards, Richard Schuh It has since been replaced by ISFC > (CP ACTIVATE ISLINK) but it still useful for 1st-to-2nd-level > configurations. > Alan Altmark > z/V

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Fran Hensler
I should have included a couple of examples: VMFTPM401I put NO_INST.TXT NO_INST_2008-08-26_03-38-11_TUE.txt 33 *-* 'put NO_INST.TXT NO_INST_2008-08-26_03-38-11_TUE.txt' +++ RC(-5) +++ VMFTPM401I put ALIAS.TXT ALIAS_2008-08-28_02-12-42_THU.txt 33 *-* 'put ALIAS.TXT ALIAS_2008-08-28_

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Mike Walter
To answer the other question... you can find a list of common CMS Return Codes documented at the front of the "Quick Reference" (SC24-6111-00), under "Understanding Messages and Return Codes" (page 9 of this edition). See: http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/hcsk1b00.pdf This is one manua

question to backup of osa-icc settings

2008-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi listers, I want to backup OSA-ICC settings to an ftp server. the HMC has one address in the company's lan and the other adapter connected to the support elements lan. The support elements have no connection to the company's lan but a route to it over the hmc. On the ftp server I have confi

Re: Request for information: Installation Summary Cards

2008-08-29 Thread Mike Hammock
I've used the "one sheet summaries" to install several zVM 5.3 systems, including both DVD and tape media. See my comments below C. M. (Mike) Hammock Sr. Technical Support zFrame & IBM zSeries Solutions (404) 643-3258 [EMAIL PROTECTED] The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on 08/28/2008 11:07:53

Re: Request for information: Installation Summary Cards

2008-08-29 Thread Brian Nielsen
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:07:53 -0400, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >The Court of Opinion and Assizes is now in Session. > >Recall that we have two one-sheet (two pages, front & back) tri-fold >installation summary cards: one for tape and one for DVD (1st and 2nd >level). > >The questio

Ted Kotlowski is out of the office.

2008-08-29 Thread Ted Kotlowski
I will be out of the office starting 08/28/2008 and will not return until 09/02/2008. I will respond to your message when I return. If your request requires immediate attention, Please contact the MVS Technical Support Hotline at 1-866-866-4488 x12000 ***

Re: VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Fran Hensler
I should have investigated this further before bothering the list. I looked at the source for VMFTP and it return -5 on subcommand syntax error I run the VMFTP with the ECHO ALL option and I can not see a syntax error. And the -5 is always on the PUT command. /Fran -

Re: Request for information: Installation Summary Cards

2008-08-29 Thread Dave Jones
Morning, Alan. Alan Altmark wrote: The Court of Opinion and Assizes is now in Session. Recall that we have two one-sheet (two pages, front & back) tri-fold installation summary cards: one for tape and one for DVD (1st and 2nd level). The questions: 1. Do these cards have value? Absolute

VMFTP Return Code -5

2008-08-29 Thread Fran Hensler
I run a VMFTP macro frequently and 99% of the time it works perfectly. But once in a while I will get a return code of -5 after the PUT fn1 fn2 Has anyone else experienced this? I think it is CMS that is issuing this negative RC but I can't find a list of CMS return codes. /Fran Hensler at Slip

Re: Request for information: Installation Summary Cards

2008-08-29 Thread Colin Allinson
Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The questions: > 1. Do these cards have value? YES!! > 2. If they are valuable, are they usable in their current form? YES!! > 3. If you could make changes to them, what would they be? VERY LITTLE!! They do what they say on the box - the

Re: Restart of TCPIP function servers when TCPIP is recycled

2008-08-29 Thread Alan Ackerman
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:23:08 +0200, Colin Allinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] m> wrote: >I am not allowed to say why, but I have very good reason to believe that >CP 5.4 & TCPIP FL540 will NOT make any difference to this issue. On Mon, 25 Aug 2008 17:14:47 -0700, Schuh, Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot