Re: WAKEUP Order of Processing

2009-04-23 Thread Kris Buelens
The DO QUEUED() is not required, there is only one stacked message for an SMSG or IUCV event. If however you also use WAKEUP's FILE option, the WAKEUP file entry that (could have) caused is **in all interrupt cases** stacked first (before the entry of an SMSG for example). If more SMSGs (or

Re: DTCTC058E

2009-04-23 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
What is at the other end of the CTC? That error indicates a line protocol error. That is, the frame that was received over the CTC link is bogus. This was connected to my other thread, routing via vswitch. After managing to talk to the VM system named UNDR, the next step was to talk to VSE.

Re: routing via vswitch

2009-04-23 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
I want to tie up some loose ends on threads I opened, to thank you (Alan!) for your help, and to ensure that the archives include solutions and not only problems. ;-) I was routing from the LAN to VM via a vswitch, to an IP address of a host connected via CTC to the VM TCPIP. The problem was the

Re: WAKEUP Order of Processing

2009-04-23 Thread Fran Hensler
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:07:06 +0200 Kris Buelens said: The DO QUEUED() is not required, there is only one stacked message for an SMSG or IUCV event. You are correct Kris. I just ran a test where I flooded my WAKEUP with 10 SMSGs in quick succession. Tey were all processed one at a time. But I

Disconnected Console Linelength

2009-04-23 Thread Colin Allinson
I am sure I should know the answer to this but I am getting old and cannot remember :- I have an exec that displays a long line on the terminal (which it does fine when I am logged on). I have a 132 wide terminal and TERM LINESIZE 132. However, when I disconnect I want the SECUSER id to see

Re: subnets and P2P HOSTs

2009-04-23 Thread Shimon Lebowitz
I see that the definition lines got messed up... let's try monospace font. :-) HOME 10.1.100.21 CTC1 10.1.55.21/16NIC1 GATEWAY ; address 'mask'1st-hop link-name MTU 10.1.100.20HOST = CTC1 4096 DEFAULTNET 10.1.35.50 NIC1

Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
We have been fortunate to obtain a small SAN device to play with in place of the 3390's that we are currently using to run z/VM and our Redhat Linux guest. I've been able to dynamically attach, configure a file system and mount it. The attach command went like: ATTACH to LSSB as 0900 I

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Romanowski, John (OFT)
DEDICATE works fine for FCP devices, I use it here; your device is an FCP device, yes? -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:48 AM To:

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Bill Munson
Bobby, a DEDICATE will work - remember the Virtual address is first and the Real address is second USER MLXX MLXX 3072M 3072M G INCLUDE LINDFLT MACHINE ESA SHARE RELATIVE 500 CPU 00 BASE CPU 01 CPU 02 CPU 03 DEDICATE 701C FD04 DEDICATE 701D FD05 DEDICATE 701E FD06

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
Oh nuts, I've got it backwards! Works fine with the correct syntax. Thanks Bobby Bauer Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892-5628 301-594-7474 From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Bill Munson Sent:

Re: WAKEUP Order of Processing

2009-04-23 Thread Kris Buelens
Either you sent that many SMSGs that CP's buffer of (255?) was overflowed, either some of the SMSGs caused your server to execute a command that uses VMCF, RAC and NETSTAT are just two examples. PIPE VMC is another obvious example. 2009/4/23 Fran Hensler f...@zvm.sru.edu: On Thu, 23 Apr 2009

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 04/23/2009 at 09:00 EDT, Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] baue...@mail.nih.gov wrote: Oh nuts, I?ve got it backwards! Works fine with the correct syntax. BTW, in order to preserve your sanity (if it's not too late!) you can replace DEDICATE 0900 with COMMAND ATTACH TO *

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Ivan Warren
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote: I want to add this to USER DIRECT but a DEDICATE will not work and I don't see how MDISK will. Can somebody enlighten me? I think what every one is wondering is : what do you mean by will not work ?! --Ivan

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
Sanity? Did not realize there was a 'COMMAND' statement for USER DIRECT but there it is in the manual. Thanks Alan Bobby Bauer Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892-5628 301-594-7474 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E]
I should have said 'does not work'. It was because I had the syntax backwards Bobby Bauer Center for Information Technology National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892-5628 301-594-7474 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Ivan Warren
Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] wrote: I should have said 'does not work'. It was because I had the syntax backwards Yep ! got that straight ! Was just saying that it would have been easier to just have a copy of the error message you were getting (probably HCPATR040E Device 0900 does not

Re: WAKEUP Order of Processing

2009-04-23 Thread James Stracka (DHL US)
Kris, I was in meetings most of yesterday and needed an answer quickly. This morning there was time to write test execs and as per Alan all RDR files are processed before the SMSG. We are updating an application that receives many reader files so the question was, What happens if 50 RDR

Re: subnets and P2P HOSTs

2009-04-23 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 04/23/2009 at 08:39 EDT, Shimon Lebowitz shimon...@gmail.com wrote: As far as I can see, I should be able to define connections like this: HOME 10.1.100.21 CTC1 10.1.55.21/16 NIC1 GATEWAY ; address 'mask' 1st-hop link-nameMTU 10.1.100.20

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread Rich Greenberg
On: Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:59:07AM -0400,Bauer, Bobby (NIH/CIT) [E] Wrote: } Oh nuts, I've got it backwards! Works fine with the correct syntax. Don't feel bad, people have been screwing that up since CP-67. :-) -- Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 239 543 1353

Web Server in z/VM - PJBR

2009-04-23 Thread jose raul baron
Hi list, I have a webshare web server running on z/VM 4.4 and I have a web page hosted on user httpd1 which creates a form. If I POST send my form with mailto, it e-mails the form fields (all the filled ones) like this: name=Write+your+name+hereaddress=Write+your+address+here%0D%0AacctID=pass

Re: Web Server in z/VM - PJBR

2009-04-23 Thread Schuh, Richard
Your attachments do not survive when you send to the list. You will have to copy them into the note for us to be able to see them. Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of jose raul baron Sent:

RSCS Connections

2009-04-23 Thread Schuh, Richard
We had a configuration that looks like this: VM/RSCS MVS1 The JES2 and MVS network folks got together and came up with a slight alteration: VM/RSCS - MVS1 |

Re: RSCS Connections

2009-04-23 Thread David Boyes
I think you could use link groups here. You'd have to define MVS1A and MVS1B to VM, then create a group MVS1 that contains the MVS1A and MVS1B links. You could then route files passing through RSCS to GROUP MVS1 and it would pick the first available link to queue it on. If MVS1A went away, then

Re: Attaching a real scsi device to a guest

2009-04-23 Thread James Stracka (DHL US)
I always say to myself we are defining Virtual devices so the first UCB is the virtual one on a DEDICATE, just as it is on an MDISK, GRAF or SPECIAL. Then IBM allows LINK which is backwards, but we all know that one! And, both UCBs are virtual, duh. It might have been helpful if between the

Re: RSCS Connections

2009-04-23 Thread Schuh, Richard
David, Our original idea was to have all jobs submitted to MVS1 and let the front end distribute the work. The users are unaware of the fact that their jobs run on different systems, the MVS1-plex is a single entity as far as they know. To make the GROUP work, it looks like I need to define

Re: RSCS Connections

2009-04-23 Thread Mark Wheeler
Richard, Following David Boyes' example, set up something like: LINKDEF MVS1A NODE MVS1 TYPE SNANJE LUNAME MVS1ALU ASTART RETRY PARM MVS1A BUFF=3840 LINKDEF MVS1B NODE MVS1 TYPE SNANJE LUNAME MVS1BLU ASTART RETRY PARM MVS1B BUFF=3840 ROUTE GROUP MVS1 TO MVS1A MVS1B Mark

Re: RSCS Connections

2009-04-23 Thread Les Geer (607-429-3580)
Following David Boyes' example= set up something like: LINKDEF MVS1A NODE MVS1 TYPE SNANJE LUNAME MVS1ALU ASTART RETRY PARM MVS1A BUFF=3D3840 LINKDEF MVS1B NODE MVS1 TYPE SNANJE LUNAME MVS1BLU ASTART RETRY PARM MVS1B BUFF=3D3840 ROUTE GROUP MVS1 TO MVS1A MVS1B I don't believe that

Re: RSCS Connections

2009-04-23 Thread Mark Wheeler
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:59:41 -0400 From: lg...@vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: RSCS Connections To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Following David Boyes' example= set up something like: LINKDEF MVS1A NODE MVS1 TYPE SNANJE LUNAME MVS1ALU ASTART RETRY PARM MVS1A BUFF=3D3840 LINKDEF MVS1B