Alan Altmark wrote:
On Wednesday, 02/17/2010 at 05:31 EST, Leland Lucius lluc...@homerow.net
wrote:
After varying off a processor, we received a disabled wait PSW of:
0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad
Systems still active and we wouldn't have even known about it, but
someone
happened to be
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:11:52AM -0500, Michael Short wrote:
I believe he also developed NetRexx, which was a lot
easier to comprehend than JAVA; at least for me.
I do not believe the TOOLS facility has been mentioned
so far. I can't imagine IBM's rediscovery of the business
value of the
Personally, I prefer the wait of 0xdeadbeef
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
Confidentiality
This is a normal PSW when you vary off a processor. Happens all the
time, as one bard put it.
On 2010-02-17, Leland Lucius lluc...@homerow.net wrote:
After varying off a processor, we received a disabled wait PSW of:
0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad0b
ad
Systems still active and we
Friends,
After 8 1/2 months of unplanned retirement, I am pleased to announce that I
have started a new job at UnitedHealth Group, supporting z/VM and zLinux. Lots
of good things happening here, and I'm working with a bunch of terrific people.
Thanks for all your support over the last
Congratulations. Gives hope to a few of us who will be unemployed very
soon.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Mark Wheeler
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:29 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Moving
Good to hear. Even it is a more-or-less competitor.
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
We've been running z/VM alongside z/OS, where the I/O config has been managed
with HCD by the z/OS folks. No worries!
Now we are getting an IFL-only box and want to maintain this organizational
relationship. I am not familiar with HCD on z/VM but from doc it looks like
IODFs can be managed
Hi,
Please can someone provide me the command to suppress messages on the
operator screen for Zvm.
Thank you.
You need to look at PROP as a start. You need something running that is
trapping messages and making decisions about whether to display or take some
action, etc.
But if you're really serious and want to suppress all messages.. SET WNG
OFF, SET MSG OFF for starters. But don't do that - just
#cp logoff would work ;)
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of ASIFF AMAHED
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:55 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: ZVM console messages
Hi,
Please can someone provide me the command to suppress messages on
Hi,
Please can someone provide me the command to suppress messages on the
operator screen for Zvm.
Don't logoff of OPERATOR - always DISConnect.
Mike MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
Being that this is a one-time effort, I wouldn't worry too much about
where the bottleneck is because you indicate can't do anything about it
anyway. Better is simply to estimate the amount of time it will take to
some gross level of precision. If you were going to be doing it regularl
y
That's very good news to hear, Mark. Congratulations and thanks for
keeping us informed on your situation.
On 02/18/2010 09:29 AM, Mark Wheeler wrote:
Friends,
After 8 1/2 months of unplanned retirement, I am pleased to announce that I
have started a new job at UnitedHealth Group,
Congratulations. Now I know why my UNH stock has been performing so
well.
Terry A. Moore
The Timken Company
-Original Message-
Friends,
After 8 1/2 months of unplanned retirement, I am pleased to announce
that I have started a new job at UnitedHealth Group, supporting z/VM and
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com wrote:
You need to look at PROP as a start. You need something running that is
trapping messages and making decisions about whether to display or take some
action, etc.
Right. It's pretty easy to set up the RTABLE to
Congratulations, Mark!
It's wonderful to see an uplifting Moving On post in this economy. Maybe
there IS light at the end of the tunnel - a light that's not a train
coming head-on!
And you get to work for a company that actively (not a typo) understands
the value of Linux for System z...
I am out of the office until 19/02/2010.
I am currently out of the office on annual leave.
If it is urgent then please contact Rachel Hill for all ITS Server Managed
Services or Dan Murphy of the ITS SDCoE for related matters.
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: End of an
Mark,
We are doing the z/VM half of what you are describing, but not using a z/OS
export.
Our procedure is as follows:
Edit the IOCP source with XEDIT and verifying the changes with the IOCP module
NOWRT option. We have found the HCM application for z/VM too difficult to use.
Then use the
We used to have z/VM-only machines here. The IOCP was maintained by the
z/OS people using HCD. They had a method of using the HMC to import the
configuration into the z/VM machine. We didn't use an IODF, just an
IOCP. These were 2064's in basic mode, but I would imagine that the
process still
Mark Wheeler wrote:
Friends,
After 8 1/2 months of unplanned retirement, I am pleased to announce
that I have started a new job at UnitedHealth Group, supporting z/VM and
zLinux. Lots of good things happening here, and I'm working with a bunch
of terrific people.
Alright Mark! I'm glad
Dennis,
Did this process include dynamic changes, or did you have to POR to pick them
up?
Thanks!
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:53:17 -0800
From: dennis.l.o'br...@bankofamerica.com
Subject: Re: Using HCD on an IFL-only Machine
To:
I will never forget my very first SHARE in 1990 at the Disneyland Hotel
I was in a standing room only CMS session and the man standing next to me
introduced himself as Mike Cowlishaw.
I was in awe at the tender age of 38 back then. I was not even smart
enough to grasp the impact of REXX back
The absurdities of IBM's tactics to force hardware upgrades.
Performance is relative. At my age, I don't perform as well as in my 20's.
In my 20's mainframes didn't perform as well as a 9672 running Linux
with an emulated z10 and z/VM.
I guess it just depends on what you want to do.
Your
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Wayne Bickerdike
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 2:24 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM support and 9672
The absurdities of IBM's tactics to force hardware
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com wrote:
The absurdities of IBM's tactics to force hardware upgrades.
Performance is relative. At my age, I don't perform as well as in my 20's.
In my 20's mainframes didn't perform as well as a 9672 running Linux
with an
Mark,
I honestly don't remember if we had to POR. We haven't had z/VM on
2064's for quite awhile now. With 2084 and later machines, we've always
had at least one LPAR running z/OS on each box. I don't think that's a
policy, it's just the way things have worked out.
Dennis
See, I'm a
What's the actual problem you're trying to solve? If this means you're
working using OPERATOR, don't do that -- use another ID. OPERATOR is too
powerful and too noisy (as you've noticed) due to other system messages.
You can certainly load and activate an IOCDS dynamically from another machine
in the complex, and I see no reason why the VM dynamic sense would not work.
(I normally load and activate HCD configs across 3 machines from one single one
- and those images also contain VM images)
Wayne,
Can you find a certified support technician to work on a very early PC,
you remember... the ones with a 5 floppy, and maybe a whole 64K of
memory?
Probably not.
Would Windows Vista run on that PC?
Probably not. (OK, perhaps Windows Vista won't run on *any* - but let's
not digress)
On Thursday, 02/18/2010 at 03:24 EST, Wayne Bickerdike wayn...@gmail.com
wrote:
The absurdities of IBM's tactics to force hardware upgrades.
I'm not sure where that comes from, Wayne. We're not forcing anyone to
upgrade anything. There are still people out there running VM/ESA on
their
IBM has actually made adjustments so some times it works out that you will
see a cost savings going to the newer hardware
we definitely saw that here by going to our Z/10
Alan Altmark
I sent an email to the address listed in Readers Comments at back of manual.
IBM has responded with a mock up of changes that will appear in a future
version of manual.
Graeme
- Original Message -
From: zMan
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 1:18 PM
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU wrote on
02/18/2010 10:48:52 AM:
Brian Nielsen bniel...@sco.idaho.gov
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
02/18/2010 10:48 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
Thank you for your answers, but the only thing i want suppress is the
messages when users logoff or logon from vterm , fills up the screen and
sits there until the operator clears them up.
i think CP TERM MORE 0 0 will do the trick.
No i will never logoff the operator or work on it, c'mon guys.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:16 PM, ASIFF AMAHED asiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you for your answers, but the only thing i want suppress is the
messages when users logoff or logon from vterm , fills up the screen and
sits there until the operator clears them up.
i think CP TERM MORE 0 0 will do
I will be out of the office starting 19/02/2010 and will not return until
22/02/2010.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Company Name: Conde Nast and National Magazine Distributors Limited Registered
Address: Unit 3, Tavistock Road, West Drayton, Middlesex UB7 7QE Registered in
On Thursday, 02/18/2010 at 04:21 EST, Leland Lucius lluc...@homerow.net
wrote:
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Wednesday, 02/17/2010 at 05:31 EST, Leland Lucius
lluc...@homerow.net
wrote:
After varying off a processor, we received a disabled wait PSW of:
0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad0bad
38 matches
Mail list logo
