An SFS aid

2010-02-24 Thread Mrohs, Ray
I deal with SFS administration only rarely and I have trouble remembering the fussy syntax for even the more common functions. I put together this little REXX to help me along. It's by no means complete, but maybe some people in the same situation will find it useful. Note K8SYSU: is an example -

Re: An SFS aid

2010-02-24 Thread Kris Buelens
Did you have a look at my SFSULIST package? My first impression is that you almost do in linemode what I created in a FILELIST-like fashion: http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/descript.cgi?SFSULIST 2010/2/24 Mrohs, Ray ray.mr...@usdoj.gov I deal with SFS administration only rarely and

FW: is there a way to automatically select a certain system config based on second level vs. first level ipls?

2010-02-24 Thread Collinson.Shannon
Thanks, Mike and Robert! That sounds perfect for our situation (and handy, too, for our later DR discussions)... Shannon Collinson shannon.collin...@suntrust.com Tel: 404.827.6070 Mobile: 404.642.1280 Fax: 404.581.1688 LEGAL DISCLAIMER The information transmitted is intended solely

Re: An SFS aid

2010-02-24 Thread Mrohs, Ray
I didn't but I'm looking at it now. It looks much more thorough. Thanks for pointing it out. Ray From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:25 AM

Re: An SFS aid

2010-02-24 Thread Schuh, Richard
As with all generalizations, including this one, yours is bad :-) There are places where signal is not bad. For example, I have an EXEC that acts as (a) an EXEC, (b) a Pipelines filter and (c) an XEDIT profile. There is no pretense that the filter or the XEDIT profile will return to the initial

Re: An SFS aid

2010-02-24 Thread Mrohs, Ray
My posting was the result of frustration with SFS. I wasn't thinking about perfect code structure. Frankly, at a certain age you care less about those things, as long as it works and the boss is happy. :-) But I understand your criticism. Ray From:

question to DS8000 and Flashcopy activation

2010-02-24 Thread fjpohlen-maill...@gmx.de
Hi all, I have to setup the flashcopy feature at a customer's DS8K next month. I know how to activate an additional feature code on this machine. At least I hope for flashcopy this works the same as an activation of additional dasds. This I have already done some time ago. When the

Re: question to DS8000 and Flashcopy activation

2010-02-24 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
I think that you need to be at z/VM 5.4 0902 to get some of the enhancements to the FLASHCOPY command (FLASHCOPY ESTABLISH, FLASHCOPY WITHDRAW, etc.) Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of

Re: VMUTIL Executing a long running EXEC

2010-02-24 Thread Scott Rohling
Have VMUTIL autolog a guest which performs the work instead...XAUTOLOG WORKRBEE#HONEY This will autolog WORKRBEE and pass it 'HONEY' ..As long as the WORKRBEE PROFILE EXEC doesn't mess with the stack(s) -- then 'HONEY' should be executed as a command. Make the last command of 'HONEY

Re: VMUTIL Executing a long running EXEC

2010-02-24 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Have VMUTIL xautolog another guest to execute the command there. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting Wandschneider, Scott scott.wandschnei...@infocrossing.com 2/24/2010 3:42 PM I have a REXX EXEC that is triggered by VMUTIL and it runs 90 minutes. While this EXEC is running VMUTIL is not acting on

Re: VMUTIL Executing a long running EXEC

2010-02-24 Thread Thomas Kern
Anything that takes longer than a few seconds to run, I move off into a separate service virtual machine. It may still be triggered by VMUTIL. Or that SVm could be running its own copy of the VMUTIL control exec. /Tom Kern /U.S. Dept of Energy /301-903-2211 On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:42:02 -0700,

Re: VMUTIL Executing a long running EXEC

2010-02-24 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
XAUTOLOG a worker VM. Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Wandschneider, Scott Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 3:42 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: VMUTIL Executing a long running

Re: VMUTIL Executing a long running EXEC

2010-02-24 Thread Wandschneider, Scott
Thanks to all who responded. I created a workerbee guest that will execute the longs tasks - Thank you, Scott Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, including any attachment to it, may contain material that is confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or Protected Health Information, within the

Re: VMUTIL Executing a long running EXEC

2010-02-24 Thread Tom Rae
Hi Scott, As numerous others have suggested, you should set up VMUTIL to XAUTOLOG another userid that will execute the long-running EXEC and return completion information via a mechanism of your choice. My $0.05 worth is that this is a perfect opportunity to exploit POOL userids, which

Re: VMUTIL Executing a long running EXEC

2010-02-24 Thread Wandschneider, Scott
As I was building the workerbee guest I was think of exactly what you described. I am already thinking of other uses. Thanks! Thank you, Scott -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Rae Sent: Wednesday, February 24,