David Boyes wrote:
Well, this light thing worked out OK in the labs, so we kicked it
upstairs to the Big Guy for product announcement. The customer tests
with the Let There Be Light campaign seemed positive, so we told him
to run with it...
Unfortunately that was day 1, but its source did not
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/28/2010 11:59 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice
On Tuesday, 09/28/2010 at 04:35 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Can
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
As always, Alan, ty for the good advice.
I have renamed with CPFMTXA the 2nd Level disks to 54O(Oh)RES, 54O(Oh)W01,
adn 54O(Oh)W02 and will copy the 2 page and 2 spool disks just for
simplicity, neatness counts.
Alan Altmark alan_altm
I have ordered the 2 APAR's, VM64879 and VM64881, and the prereq's for the
z196 support for z/VM 5.4
But I noticed that my RSU level is only 0802 for both CP and CMS.
What is the latest RSU level and should I just order and apply the latest
RSU instead of trying to apply these APARs to this
, a R/O link to MAINT 123 gives you access to 540RES. Those
definitions are usually there in MAINT when the system is installed.
Ron
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:11 PM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
If I am DDR copying 540RES, 540W01, 540W02 to another set of disks I
tyvm
Les Geer (607-429-3580) g...@gdlvm7.vnet.ibm.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/28/2010 07:28 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 5.4 RSU Level For z/196 support
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:42 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice
ty again.
May I have a copy of your FLASH2ND EXEC?
Frank M. Ramaekers
alone, not my employer's.
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/24/2010 01:44 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Applying Maintenance
MODULE fm
-1CPLOAD MODULE fm (OLDDATE process for backout purposes. Consistency is
the hobgoblin of my little mind. :-)
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM
As Marcy previously observed, the z196's should bring the cost of z10's
down dramatically.
Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/27/2010 01:28 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
Their is a
pathological scenario if the virtual operation doesn't have all its
own dedicated storage (like in LPARs); VM will be managing virtual
pages using an LRU methodology (least-recently-used pages are the ones
selected for replacement) ... at the same time the
and a z10. All is well, YMMV;)
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 10:58 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Applying Maintenance - Best
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:02 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice
Is there a procedure for applying maintenance selectively such that a
full system
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:32 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice
ty for sharing this.
One question though:
It is ok to apply the maintenance
.
Cool will be the SSI release when it comes (imnsho).
5.4 runs just fine on a z196 (with PTF).
marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:36 PM
To: IBMVM
tyvm, this is very helpful.
You mention this is what you do when you do major maintenance.
Do you have a different, perhaps *shortcut* procedure, when you are just
putting on COR PTF to fix a specific problem?
Colin Allinson cgallin...@amadeus.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 7:55 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Virtualizing a z10
Marcy,
You speak of more powerful features in SSI and SOD l that would eventually
make it worthwhile to move
System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 9:32 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Applying Maintenance - Best Practice
ty for sharing this.
One question though:
It is ok to apply the maintenance to the production system
On Friday, 09/24/2010 at 02:45 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
So, I guess the bottom line is that there is no *silver bullet*, no
*shortcut*, for even the smallest change, that PUT2PROD at Level1:
steps on the current CPLOAD no matter what you do
weekend.
We have the z196 maint with RSU 1002 on all of test dev now (3 lpars). On
both a z196 and a z10. All is well, YMMV;)
Marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Thursday, September 23
ty, I was just wondering what took her so long. ;-)
David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/24/2010 04:58 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re:
Flipping the PFPO bit (PSW bit 44) to virtualize z10 when ipling z/VM 61on
a z9 should qualify.
David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/24/2010 05:13 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] What is the z/VM 5.4 Compatibility PTF for z196?
Look at the page http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/vmreqze.html for the
complete list of z/VM APARS for the zEnterprise.
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:07 AM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com
first? If your 2nd level system is meant to be a z/VM 'test'
system, then it seems like you're already committed to that level of
effort.
Scott Rohling
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 8:30 AM, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Would you recommend putting this 5.4 zEnterprise
expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/23/2010 12:58 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
to 5.4
at the moment.
Cool will be the SSI release when it comes (imnsho).
5.4 runs just fine on a z196 (with PTF).
marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Sorry to ask a simple question, but . . .
What is the fastest way to check that certain specific APARs and/or PTFs
are on?
is on your system.
DJ
On 9/22/2010 2:58 PM, George Henke/NYLIC wrote:
Sorry to ask a simple question, but . . .
What is the fastest way to check that certain specific APARs and/or
PTFs
are on?
The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents
may
Is it permissible to simply FTP from a desktop with mput CKD* the CPDVD
contents to the IIS machine instead of driving FTP from the IIS machine
with the INSTPIPE module and the CMS pipe command?
Is pipe doing anything else under covers when it loads the minidisk?
I have just installed z/VM 61 level 2 on a 2094 which I believe is a z9.
It is not surpiseing that when I try to ipl I get a wait state code of
9030 because it does not like the architecture level.
I don't suppose there is any way of virtualizing aournd this.
] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:23 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Virtualizing a z10
I have just installed z/VM 61 level 2 on a 2094 which I believe is a z9.
It is not surpiseing that when I try to ipl I get a wait state code of
9030 because
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:36 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Virtualizing a z10
ty,
We already have 5.4 at level 1.
We just want to take advantage of some of the cool features of 6.1 and
position
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]
On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:23
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Virtualizing a z10
I have just installed z/VM 61 level 2 on a 2094 which I believe is a
z9
Terry wrote,
it is imperative that you have a robust paging subsystem
I do not claim great knowledge in z/VM performance matters.
Where ignorance is bliss, tis folly to be wise (Thomas Gray)
Does z/VM, unlike z/OS, still need to do a lot of paging?
In the z/OS world paging has become
I first installed it on or about December, 1989, VM/SP/HPO 5.0
Jeff Gribbin jeff.grib...@gmail.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
09/10/2010 11:25 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
We currently have a functioning VSWITCH, LNXVSW1, related to a VSWITCH
controller, DTCVSW2 at OSA 9004.
Q VSWITCH
09:14:01 VSWITCH SYSTEM LNXVSW1 Type: VSWITCH Connected: 3Maxconn:
INFINITE
09:14:01 PERSISTENT RESTRICTEDNONROUTER Accounting:
OFF
09:14:01 VLAN
In SHOPZ, for Electronic Delivery, is it necessary to order DDR to get a
DVD image for upload (ftping) to VM?
I installed 5.4 last October from an Electronic Delivery using Chapters 6
and 7 of the IBM Guide For Automated Installation and Service by ftping a
DVD image up to VM. It went very
EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
In SHOPZ, for Electronic Delivery, is it necessary to order DDR to get
a DVD
image for upload (ftping) to VM?
I installed 5.4 last October from an Electronic Delivery using Chapters
6 and 7
of the IBM Guide For Automated
- DDR or DVD?
On Tuesday, 08/31/2010 at 09:54 EDT, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
I have done as you said and here are the instructions. I have bolded
the text
in question. The instructions call for selecting DDR. Then the
instructions
at the bottom
09:26:39 DTCOSD310E VSWITCH-OSD device VSWAILT181DDEV: Missing or
incorrect required port name
09:26:39 DTCOSD082E VSWITCH-OSD shutting down:
The VSWITCH expects, requires a port name for 181D.
Either the Portname or the Port number which defaulted to P0 is wrong.
You can specify port number
Simple.
z/VM 6.1 is needed for Z196 hardware. z/VM 5.4 will not run on it.
It is positioning for the new hardware.
Horlick, Michael michael.horl...@cgi.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
08/26/2010 12:04 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:54 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z/VM 5.4 or 6.1 on new z10
Simple.
z/VM 6.1 is needed for Z196 hardware. z/VM 5.4 will not run on it.
It is positioning for the new hardware.
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 5.4 or 6.1 on new z10
That's not true.
a z10 or z196 is needed for 6.1.
But 5.4 will run on both of those boxes as well.
marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke
That's not true.
a z10 or z196 is needed for 6.1.
But 5.4 will run on both of those boxes as well.
marcy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of George Henke/NYLIC
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2010 9:54 AM
201 - 244 of 244 matches
Mail list logo
