[mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 1:36 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Q STOR command results
On Friday, 08/05/2011 at 02:31 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Does the RESERVE work the same for z
Alan,
When you add up all of the RESERVE memory for all LPARS does it need to add up
to or below the amount of available unused memory or can each LPAR be defined
the max amount of memory that is available and unused?
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin
CMS - CITIC
3300 Lord Baltimore
on the HMC for IFLs on LPAR
Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) writes:
I my configuring my z/VM LPARS on our new z196. We have 25 IFLs but I am not
assigning all of them to all LPARS. So if I set the Initial # of processors
to 10 for an LPAR and set the rest 15 in reserved can I VARY the IFLs
is actually available will show up as STANDBY storage in
z/VM and the rest as RESERVED. Note that the amount of STANDBY
displayed may be the same on all LPARs, because the same unused
storage pool is available to all the LPARs.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar
,Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR)
(CTR)
Wrote:
} Do You mean at the IPL prompt? If so no I don't think we did.
Well, thats why they are off. The 2 CPUs clocks are independant of each
other. Re-IPL set the clock when prompted.
To reset the z/VM clock to match the CEC time, deactivate the LPAR
Hi
We are getting ready to migrate to a z196 from our z10. We brought a z/VM 5.4
system up on the z196 for the first time today. We noticed that
the clock on the VM system was off by 4 hours and 4 minutes (showed as 7AM when
it was 11:04).
We did not make any changes to the TIMEZONE settings.
] On Behalf
Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 7:55 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Time off running z/VM 5.4 1101 on z196 for first time
Did you set the clock when you IPL'd z/VM?
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar
, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:00:12PM -0400,Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Wrote:
} Do You mean at the IPL prompt? If so no I don't think we did.
Well, thats why they are off. The 2 CPUs clocks are independant of each
other. Re-IPL set the clock when prompted.
--
Rich Greenberg Sarasota, FL, USA
be interested.
Best Regards,
Doug :)
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 29, 2011, at 19:09, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.govmailto:terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Hi
We are getting ready to migrate to a z196 from our z10. We brought a z/VM 5.4
system up on the z196
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 1:30 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM memory Limit under z/VM 6.1
On Friday, 07/22/2011 at 08:46 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
No problem thanks Alan.
I didn't mean to leave you
Hi
I know that the maximum amount of memory that is supported on a z/VM 5.4 LPAR
is 250G. Does this limit change under z/VM 6.1, that is, does IBM support a
bigger memory foot print for the a z/VM LPAR under 6.1?
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin
CMS - CITIC
3300 Lord Baltimore Drive,
On Friday, 07/22/2011 at 06:26 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
I know that the maximum amount of memory that is supported on a z/VM 5.4
LPAR
is 250G. Does this limit change under z/VM 6.1, that is, does IBM
support a
bigger memory foot print for the a z
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 7:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM memory Limit under z/VM 6.1
On Friday, 07/22/2011 at 06:35 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Thanks Alan, meant to say 256G. We actually ran into this and I had
HI
We are planning to exploit the Workload Management function on zManager (URM).
Are GPMPs supported for z/Linux RHEL 5.2?
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin
CMS - CITIC
3300 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite 200, 21244
Engineering Computing
Mainframe Support
Cell - 443 632-4191
Hi
Resending this not sure if it got out!
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin
CMS - CITIC
3300 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite 200, 21244
Engineering Computing
Mainframe Support
Cell - 443 632-4191
From: Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 11:35 PM
To: IBMVM
not
running them in LPARs, you should be fine.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 3:07 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Running RHEL 4.6 guests on z196 under z/VM 5.4
Hi
Hi
I know this was a topic not too long ago so sorry if I am redundant but I just
want to be sure of something, and that is, can I run RHEL 4.6 under z/VM 5.4 on
a z196? We have about 5 guests that we need to convert to RHEL 5 but the
application folks will not have time to convert all of the
, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.4 vs z/VM 6.1
On 5/23/2011 12:51, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Hi
I know this was discussed awhile back, but is there any compelling reason why I
need to go to z/VM 6.1 for a z196 install? The more I read about z/VM 6.1 it
seems that most
Hi
I know this was discussed awhile back, but is there any compelling reason why I
need to go to z/VM 6.1 for a z196 install? The more I read about z/VM 6.1 it
seems that most of the enhancements are covered under z/VM 5.4 at the latest
level. But I just wanted to make sure that there is
in error, please advise
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for
your cooperation.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 9:51 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
someone else has, but if it not GA, they wouldn't be able to comment yet!
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 10:09 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re
Greenberg
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 9:24 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: password_on_cmds feature statement in CONFIG
On: Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 08:43:42PM -0400,Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Wrote:
} In the PROFILE EXEC for each guest I have the LINK LNXADMIN 191 391 RR
Hi
We have be told by the auditors to set the AUTOLOG and LINK to in the
PASSWORD_ON_CMDS parameter to 'NO' on the SYSTEM CONFIG Features statement. It
seems that we tried this the last time the auditors mentioned this and we had
problems and did not change it. I can't remember what the issues
no password is needed there. I can't think of any reason it would
cause any issue for you. Most systems I use do not allow passwords on
those commands.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Hi
We have be told
. if not - let
us know the failure and I can suggest what needs setting up in RACF.
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.govmailto:terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Hi
Here is one I found. This (see below) in all of my z/Linux guests
Thanks Scott and All.
So if I remove the password from the LINK statements and set LINK to 'NO' than
I will need to make sure that access is defined in RACF is this correct?
Also if I run across any AUTOLOGs in EXECS how are these handled if I set the
AUTOLOG to 'NO'?
Thanks again I really
Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 5:17 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: password_on_cmds feature statement in CONFIG
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
So if I remove the password from the LINK statements
Thanks Scott. I use a combination of the guest having its own A disk and a
common link to the LNXADMIN user's A disk. The reason I do the separate guest A
disk is because I may have differences per guest. Such as I execute the SWAPGEN
EXEC to allocate the VDISK from the PROFILE EXEC of the user
Hi
I have a copy of the DASD volume where the A (191) disk resides for a specific
z/Linux guest. I want to point the guest to the new copied volume from the one
it is currently using without bringing the guest down. Is there a way to do
this?
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin
CMS -
, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.govmailto:terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Hi
I have a copy of the DASD volume where the A (191) disk resides for a specific
z/Linux guest. I want to point the guest to the new copied volume from the one
it is currently
only left with DETACH/LINK to deal with virtual
disks.
Hope that helps -
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.govmailto:terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Hi,
Ok I got it. Before I contacted the list I had tried doing the '#CP REL
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of
Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:22 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUmailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Detaching A disk from z/Linux guest dynamically
Hi
I have a copy of the DASD volume where the A (191) disk resides for a specific
the directory correctly.
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov mailto:terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Hi
I think I may have screwed up here. I had to make multiple changes
to my Directory so I did the following:
I
Hi
I think I may have screwed up here. I had to make multiple changes to my
Directory so I did the following:
I did a DIRM USER WITHPASS to get the current directory
I then added my changes to USER WITHPASS on my A disk
I then shutdown DIRMAINT.
I then copied the USER WITHPASS from my A disk
Hi
I have something set wrong for my userid on this one LPAR and for the life
can't see it.
When I issue a basic command such as Q DISK I get the following:
12:14:28 q disk
12:14:28 HCPCQV003E Invalid option - DISK
I can do like the Q N command and get response no problem. I remember having
] On Behalf
Of Neale Ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 12:23 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Something wrong with my USERID
#CP TERM MODE VM
On 4/6/11 12:20 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Hi
I have something set wrong for my userid
Alan,
Can you tell me where you have the Best Practices document?
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin
CMS - CITIC
3300 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite 200, 21244
Engineering Computing
Mainframe Support
Cell - 443 632-4191
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
-4191
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 12:42 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z196 and z/Manager (URM)
On Monday, 04/04/2011 at 08:53 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR
Hi
This weekend we changed the SWITCH on the Data Comm side to tag a new VLAN
(581). Up to this point the switch was only set up for ACCESS switch not
TRUNK with a default VLAN of 472. Now the SWITCH PORT is changed to handle
TRUNKING.
On my z/VM side I set up the VSWITCH to now handle VLAN
] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:50 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VLAN and GRANT
On Monday, 04/04/2011 at 01:38 EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Thanks. One thing since I have never set up anything for the VMLAN RACF
class
Hi
We are planning for a z196 Enterprise Processor. I was wondering specifically
about z/Manager. I know this is being touted as the Hub of this new Enterprise
Processor. I also know that a lot of work on behalf of z/VM and z/Linux was
done in this area. I understand that z/Manager contains
on any grant on a vswitch
using a trunk port.
Symptoms of getting it wrong will be no packets going anywhere on a 'q vswitch
details
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent
Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 8:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Supporting Dot.1q trunk in z/Linux
Thanks Alan, this is what I was looking for. So the Vswitch and the NIC def
a vlan on your SET VSWITCH GRANT statements.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 8:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Supporting Dot
Hi
We have run out of the IPs on a certain SUBNET. The network folks say we need
to set the VSWITCHES up as a Dot.1q trunk on both their side and the z/Linux
side. We are not currently using Dot.1q trunk.
So my question is from my z/Linux side what changes to I need to make and where
are
Hi
I have a bunch of lines in a file and I want to insert in the beginning of each
line a Q DA command:
EX:
09 B32D70
10 B32D80
11 B32D81
12 B32D82
13 B32D83
I want to insert the following command Q DA in front of each entry. What is the
best way to do this using xedit?
Q DA B32D70
Terry
Resending this!
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support
Office - 443 348-2102
Cell - 443 632-4191
From: Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 8:47 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: FRAME
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.govmailto:terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Error! Filename not specified.
Hi
I want to turn off FRAME REODERING for some guests as described in APAR VM64774
(PTF UM33167 5.4). We had heard that the new (Set REORDER
Hi
I want to turn off FRAME REODERING for some guests as described in APAR VM64774
(PTF UM33167 5.4). We had heard that the new (Set REORDER) command was shipped
as a dynamically loaded module that fooled around with some fields in the VMDBK.
Has anyone used this and if so were you able to
I can tell you that DTCVSW* must be up before the VSWITCH can be defined and
that the VSWITCH must be defined and READY before the z/Linux guest can connect
to the VSWITCH.
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support
Office -
or DTCVSW* are definitely
not started.
Kind regards,
Alexander Riedel
Von: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] Im Auftrag
von Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. November 2010 18:26
An: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Betreff: Re: No IPL VSWITCH Connectivity
Ok, my point was that you would not be able to connect the network and if you
can't connect to the network having the VSWICTH defined does not mean much at
least not for me.
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support
Office -
The VSWITCH will not be defined if TCP/IP has not initialized. But the GRANTS
should have no bearing on whether the VSWTICH gets defined or not. I do both my
define and Grants in AUTOLOG2 in my case, and come up with no issues at IPL
time.
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS
the supported range introduces any new problems,
certainly let us know through normal support channels.
- Bill Holder, z/VM Development, IBM Endicott
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:22:55 -0400, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Thanks Bill. I will say that I am in fact seeing some
Hi
We will be increasing our REAL STORAGE size on one of our z/VM LPARs to about
264G.I had heard that this may be getting close to some kind of MAX is anyone
running a z/VM LPAR with this much REAL defined and if so are there any issues
that I need to be aware of?
Thank You,
Terry Martin
are passed the maximum supported storage for z/VM.After
that - it's kind of a performance crapshoot.
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.govmailto:terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Error! Filename not specified.
Hi
We will be increasing
/VM.
After that - it's kind of a performance crapshoot.
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
storage: 256 GB
zVM unsupported central storage: 1 TB
The largest we ever managed was 440 GB
So it appears you are passed the maximum supported storage for z/VM.
After that - it's kind of a performance crapshoot.
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR
to a degree that
is more manageable and can be tuned around.
We understand the need to increase the supported
storage size above the current 256GB limit.
- Bill Holder, z/VM Development, IBM Endicott
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:00:36 -0400, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote
Hi
I am trying to get RACF DSMON reports for our Auditors. I am following the RACF
Security Auditor's Guide and do not seem to be getting the reports. I am
receiving this. 200 is my Primary RACF Data base and 300 is the backup RACF
data Base.
DMSACC723I R (0200) R/W - OS
DMSACC723I Q
EDT, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
CSTSET001I CMS SUB-TASKING SUPERVISOR INITIALIZED.
CSTINT003I INITIATOR ACTIVATED.
RPISMF050E Syntax error in SMF control card
RPISMF054I SMF recording not started
You have an error in your SMF CONTROL file on RACFVM's 191
Hi
We are working on a problem and trying get a .PCAP file produced from
TCPDUMP to send to IBM. We got the .PCAP file but it was 3G before being
zipped. My question is are there some parameters that we can specify
that will make the .PCAP file more manageable so that IBM can work with
it
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 9:05 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: .PCAP file form TCPDUMP in REDHAT
--_=_NextPart_002_01CB58C4.974F46C7
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding
Yes, and the original statement was based on the assumption that the
over commitment of real memory was high. Obviously if there is little to
no over commitment than you will see very little paging from z/VM on
behalf of the users.
I will also add that even in z/OS say you are running a good
I would just add that for any significant number of z/Linux guests it is
imperative that you have a robust paging subsystem and enough spool space to
hold CP dumps as well as other spool files.
Having a well configured paging subsystem will greatly reduce the possibility
of issues when your
Hi
I just took a hit on my DEV LPAR which brought it down the error was:
PGT003 Explanation: The DASD page slot being released was not previously
allocated, or the slot address is incorrect.
Has anyone seen this before and if so what were the issues.
I have opened a PMR with IBM.
file
is on)
But it looks good..
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Thanks all. Just to confirm it is ok to do this:
Devices ,
OFFLINE_AT_IPL -
Hi
On my system all of the devices come online at IPL time. So if I only
want certain devices to come online on certain LPARS can I do something
like this where since all of the devices come online at IPL can I vary
them all offline and then come back and issue the online command for
only
? That's the opposite approach and not as 'safe'...
Scott Rohling
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Error! Filename not specified.
Hi
On my system all of the devices come online at IPL time. So if I only
want certain devices
).
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 6:30 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: DEVICES Statement in SYSTEM CONFIG
Hi
On my system all of the devices come online at IPL time. So if I
Issue a DET VSWITCH vswitchname - this will destroy it and you can than
re-define it.
BTW, are you sure that that the OSA 181D is really PORT 0 and not PORT
1?
Once you get it set up you can add it to the guest with COUPLE command.
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin -
Hi
We just cabled OSA 9700 to our z10 it is on CHPID 39.
I can VARY ON 9700 and it comes online and when I display it shows
OSA 9700 FREE
Now when I try to configure my VSWITCH to use it I get this:
CP DEFINE VSWITCH VSWAPPUB CONTROLLER * RDEV 9700.P0
VSWITCH SYSTEM
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Trying to get OSA online
What does q 9701-9702 report?
On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:15, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Hi
We just cabled OSA 9700 to our z10 it is on CHPID 39.
I can VARY ON 9700
Yes, the issue was I did not vary on the other addresses within the triplet
(9701-9702). Once I varied this online I was able to get my vswitch enabled.
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support
Office - 443 348-2102
Hi
I am trying to find out if there is a utility in z/Linux in my case RHEL
5.2 that will allow me to copy a z/Linux formatted disk to another disk.
Also do you know if DDR cares rather there is a VTOC on a volume if it
is used to backup the volume without a VTOC?
Thank You,
a disk using a z/Linux guest
DDR doesn’t care about VTOCs or anything. It simply copies whatever is there. A
very useful trait in many cases.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR
Thanks to all for the information this will help prepare backup and
recovery processes moving forward:
First, we do not count on Full pack backups for our restores normally we
use FDRUPSTREAM to backup the guests file systems on a daily and weekly
basis, however the guests are still running when
Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 12:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: How to copy a disk using a z/Linux guest
On 8/16/10 11:10 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
First, we do
Hi
I have a dilemma. All of my z/Linux DASD volumes are formatted for a
VTOC on cylinder zero so that I can leverage the z/OS DFDSS backups of
these volumes. No problem, however I am getting this one guest ready for
DR and as such running DFDSS on z/OS to accomplish this. This particular
...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 9:44 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: DR Backup using DFDSS
Hi
I have a dilemma. All of my z/Linux DASD volumes are formatted for a
VTOC on cylinder zero so that I can leverage the z/OS DFDSS
AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
I have a dilemma. All of my z/Linux DASD volumes are formatted for a
VTOC on cylinder zero so that I can leverage the z/OS DFDSS backups of
these volumes. No problem, however I am getting this one guest ready
for
DR
Hi
We are gearing up for DR and this time they want us to recover our
Oracle data base which is 5.5TB. These are all z/Linux guests running at
RHEL 4.6 under z/VM 5.4.
The data base storage is allocated on LUNs with WWPNs and LUN IDS. We
just got off of our TAP meeting with hot site
have to
have a contract in place with the hot site to provide the SCSI storage.
Bob McCarthy
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Tuesday, August 10
] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 2:52 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: DR and FCP
Hi
We are gearing up for DR and this time they want us to recover our
Oracle data base which is 5.5TB. These are all z/Linux guests running at
RHEL 4.6 under z/VM 5.4
System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:29 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DR and FCP
Bob,
One question how does it work In terms of matching the WWPN and LUNIDS
from what we have defined in the z/Linux guest
Hi Marcy,
I use to format the whole volume under CPFMTXA or ICKDSF on z/OS and
then turn around only to have Linux format them again a real waste of
time.
So now I just init cylinder zero with a z/VM Label for doc purposes and
it works fine.
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS
Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 3:48 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: ICKDSF format of new DASD
Hi Marcy,
I use to format the whole volume under CPFMTXA or ICKDSF on z/OS and
then turn
Posted on both Lists.
Thanks
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support
Office - 443 348-2102
Cell - 443 632-4191
From: Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 5:27 PM
To: linux
Hi
We have been Kick Starting new z/Linux guests under RHEL 5.2. We have a
base build in the Kick Start of one MOD3 and two MOD27's.
In the CONF file we specify these devices (700, 800-801) things work
fine.
Recently we started adding another MOD27 to the base build (700,
800-802).
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:55 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Define FULL PACK MDISK or DEDICATE z/Linux DASD
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar
Hi
I am sure this has come up before but I could not find it in the
archives (getting oldJ).
Anyway, during our z/Linux guest build process, which we are doing at a
very fast pace, we end up initializing the z/Linux DASD under z/VM. Now,
when we execute the z/Linux Kick Start that
Hi
I am trying to configure a channel path offline on VM. I am using command:
VARY OFF PATH 99 FROM ALL
Does this do the trick or is there another command to configure the channel
offline?
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin
CITIC Contract
z/OS Operating System Support/Performance and Tuning
the SUBCHAN
Larry Davis
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 12:15 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Configuring a Channel path offline on z/VM
Hi
I am trying to configure
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 6:42 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] HIPER MCL
Hi
I am running z/VM 5.4 and RHEL 5.2 and I want to add another VCPU to a
Linux guest dynamically. Can this be done without the need to recycle
the guest? And if so what is the command to do so?
Thanks in advance for the help!
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 6:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] HIPER MCL for z10 processors
Aria,
Do you have any more information on this. I cannot seem to locate
anything about this?
Thank
Aria,
Do you have any more information on this. I cannot seem to locate
anything about this?
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems Support
Office - 443 348-2102
Cell - 443 632-4191
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
Hi
Well we converted to a z10 this weekend. We had a few issues but got
through them.
There was one fall out with the OSA. Before the conversion we had an
LPAR that has access to a set of OSA UCBs and these UCBs were defined to
a VSWITCH. After the conversion these OSA UCBs were
Of Brian Nielsen
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 2:56 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: OSA Question
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:33:12 -0400, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
There was one fall out with the OSA. Before the conversion we had an
LPAR that has
Hi
We are moving to a z10. My question is do I need to do anything
different for my Vswitch definition or how I specify the NIC DEF in the
Directory when I migrate to the z10?
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Citic
z/OS and z/VM Performance Tuning and Operating Systems
1 - 100 of 441 matches
Mail list logo
