Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-13 Thread David Boyes
interesting to try and locate the knee. I found a copy of the Reed Mullen chart I mentioned. On a z990, the MP effect for VM kicked in seriously at 14 processors for VM workload. For z/OS workload the MP effect became serious at 9 processors. I suspect that the z10 is a very different animal,

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-13 Thread Marcy Cortes
...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of David Boyes Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 11:20 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting interesting to try and locate the knee. I found a copy of the Reed Mullen chart I mentioned. On a z990, the MP effect for VM kicked

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-13 Thread David Boyes
On 8/13/09 2:22 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote: Can you email me that chart? Or is it paper? And thanks Alan A for that link. That helps. The copy I have is paper, but I'll try to get it scanned and send it to you offlist.

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-13 Thread Dean, David (I/S)
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting Can you email me that chart? Or is it paper? And thanks Alan A for that link. That helps. Marcy This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-12 Thread Schuh, Richard
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting That's the first thing I thought of, too -- but note that there is no z/V= M in this picture, just z/OS and PR/SM. z/OS does recognize the existence of z/VM but it still does no= t handshake with z/VM as far as I know. Have I

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-11 Thread Alan Ackerman
That's the first thing I thought of, too -- but note that there is no z/V M in this picture, just z/OS and PR/SM. z/OS does recognize the existence of z/VM but it still does no t handshake with z/VM as far as I know. Have I missed something? Alan Ackerman Alan (dot) Ackerman (at) Bank of

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-11 Thread Alan Altmark
On Sunday, 08/09/2009 at 11:01 EDT, Alan Ackerman alan.acker...@earthlink.net wrote: The MP effect is determined by the operating system and by the workload. It is not simply a hardware effect at all. If two or more processors access the same memory location -- one will have to wait. True

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-11 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 08/12/2009 at 01:01 EDT, Alan Ackerman alan.acker...@earthlink.net wrote: That's the first thing I thought of, too -- but note that there is no z/VM in this picture, just z/OS and PR/SM. z/OS does recognize the existence of z/VM but it still does not handshake with z/VM as far

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-10 Thread Schuh, Richard
Does this mean that z/OS is finally catching up to the VM/DOS handshaking of years gone by? Regards, Richard Schuh z/OS has a new feature HiperDispatch to help reduce the MP and NUMA effec= t. In the Austin SHARE proceedings, see 2831 - System z10: HiperDispatch From a Sysprog=

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-09 Thread Alan Ackerman
How many IFLs are we talking about here? At a guess, if you are going fro m 4 to 8 IFLs, you won't see any MP effect, but if you are going from 30 to 60 IFLs, you will defi nitely see an MP effect. What I can remember about the MP effect: The MP effect is determined by the operating system and

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-08 Thread Dave Wade
-Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: 08 August 2009 04:04 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Marcy Cortes wrote: I'm getting conflicting

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-08 Thread Feller, Paul
missing something? Paul Feller AIT Mainframe Technical Support -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 7:50 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting I'm

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-08 Thread Quay, Jonathan (IHG)
is floating around out there somewhere. I did not see or hear of anything about the UP/MP effect inside Linux itself. From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Marcy Cortes Sent: Fri 8/7/2009 8:49 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: MP effect on z/VM

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-08 Thread Barton Robinson
First, IBM has never measured this for z/VM, their resources devoted to things like LSPR for VM are long gone. So you are either getting a sale's person's guess, or a z/OS guess and I guess they guess different? Amdahl's Law of Multiprogramming from a software perspective states that a

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-08 Thread Mark Post
On 8/7/2009 at 8:49 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote: -snip- (z/OS per engine pricing actually goes down to compensate for this, z/VM's does not). Are you talking about z/VM itself, or products that run on z/VM? Just to clarify for others reading this, the one-time

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-08 Thread Marcy Cortes
effect on z/VM Linux hosting On 8/7/2009 at 8:49 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote: -snip- (z/OS per engine pricing actually goes down to compensate for this, z/VM's does not). Are you talking about z/VM itself, or products that run on z/VM? Just to clarify for others

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-08 Thread Marcy Cortes
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 9:08 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting I'm not so concerned about the pricing - just wondered if it indicated that it didn't have

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-08 Thread Marcy Cortes
for your cooperation. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2009 9:09 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting And I mistated the pricing thing

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-08 Thread Mark Post
On 8/8/2009 at 12:07 PM, Marcy Cortes marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote: -snip- The real concern is whether to put 6 IFLS on 7 different boxes or do we lose anything by having say 14 IFLs on 3 boxes or 10-10-11-11 on 4 boxes. Based on what Jim Vincent and Rick Barlow have been saying for

MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-07 Thread Marcy Cortes
I'm getting conflicting answers from IBM. How does VM scale with regards to multiprocessors? In the z/OS world the 1st z/10 engine is like 900 something MIPS and the 60th on the box is something like 359. Does z/VM hosting Linux suffer the same fate? (z/OS per engine pricing actually goes

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-07 Thread John McKown
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, Marcy Cortes wrote: I'm getting conflicting answers from IBM. How does VM scale with regards to multiprocessors? In the z/OS world the 1st z/10 engine is like 900 something MIPS and the 60th on the box is something like 359. Does z/VM hosting Linux suffer the same

Re: MP effect on z/VM Linux hosting

2009-08-07 Thread David Boyes
Reed Mullen used to have a chart in one of his presentations that showed that the MP effect was still present for VM workload but that the impact was smaller than for Z/OS and kicked it later in the curve. I don't remember the precise numbers (and the z10 probably has changed everything)