Re: Packing Methods

2009-05-06 Thread Jim Bohnsack
quot;ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: Packing Methods Richa= rd, You have the same questions I had when I started to put  in place our = DR solution. We also have 3590E drives and I never tried to remove the hard = drive default compaction. I don’t see a reason fo

Re: Packing Methods

2009-05-04 Thread Tom Duerbusch
>> "Schuh, Richard" 5/4/2009 12:30 PM >>> > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch > Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:21 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re:

Re: Packing Methods

2009-05-04 Thread Schuh, Richard
> -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Tom Duerbusch > Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:21 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Packing Methods > > The reason to turn off 3590E hardwar

Re: Packing Methods

2009-05-01 Thread Tom Duerbusch
The reason to turn off 3590E hardware compression, is if you having problems "feeding the beast". You get faster backups if you can keep the drive going. An IBM 3590E writes to tape at 14 MBs. If hardware compression is turned on and you are getting 3:1 compression, then you have to feed the c

Re: Packing Methods

2009-04-30 Thread Ivica Brodaric
If your main concern is impact on users and you have a speedy link between the sites, then by all means use hardware compression only. If your link is slow or there is other traffic on it, you may consider software compression and then muzzle the backup application using priorities etc. I personall

Re: Packing Methods

2009-04-30 Thread Alain Benveniste
; Regards, > Richard Schuh > > > > > >> >> >> >> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On >> Behalf Of Alain Benveniste >> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 4:25 AM >> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU >> Subject: Re: Packing

Re: Packing Methods

2009-04-30 Thread Schuh, Richard
z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Alain Benveniste Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 4:25 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Packing Methods Richard, You have the same questions I had when I started to put in place our DR solution. We also have 3590E

Re: Packing Methods

2009-04-30 Thread Alain Benveniste
Richard, You have the same questions I had when I started to put in place our DR solution. We also have 3590E drives and I never tried to remove the hard drive default compaction. I don¹t see a reason for that. Now choosing software compaction is a must if you have enough cpu to do the work for b

Packing Methods

2009-04-29 Thread Schuh, Richard
We are working on a DR process. I notice that the defaults for a Hidro backup include the PACK option which tells Hidro to pack, or condense in some fashion, its output. The output is being written to 3590E drives. It appears that there are three choices we can make for condensing the data: soft