7-429-3580)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
07/04/2006 11:33 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic
CTC (Non-SNA)
>Sure, I could set this up (maybe tomo
>Sure, I could set this up (maybe tomorrow) . However, a TRACE ... ALL for
>the link for 1.5 mins produced 10+ lines so it could be big as it can
>take some time before the problem occurs.
>
>I guess you would want the output offlist :-)
>
Yes offlist to lesgeer at IBMUS would be good. Not th
Les,
Sure, I could set this up (maybe tomorrow)
. However, a TRACE ... ALL for the link for 1.5 mins produced 10+ lines
so it could be big as it can take some time before the problem occurs.
I guess you would want the output offlist
:-)
Regards
Colin Allinson
"Les Geer (607-429-3580)"
<[
>In our all our early attempts the number of RSCS streams was 1 (as was
>JRNUM, JTNUM, SRNUM & STNUM). The failure was in opening STREAM 1 (the
>only stream).
>
>I have now raised a PMR on this which, I guess, will find its way to you
>(if it hasnt already).
>
>My best guess at the moment is that t
Sorry, all. I must have had my finger tips disconnected from my brain. I
would not have consciously intended to put a posting of a personal or
private nature on the list.
I apologize.
Jim
Colin--I was thinking about Amadeus last week anyway. I am still shaking
my head in disbelief that la
Les,
In our all our early attempts the number
of RSCS streams was 1 (as was JRNUM, JTNUM, SRNUM & STNUM). The failure
was in opening STREAM 1 (the only stream).
I have now raised a PMR on this which,
I guess, will find its way to you (if it hasnt already).
My best guess at the moment is that
th
You need to ensure there are at least the same number (minimum) of JES
transmitters as RSCS streams defined or you will encounter conditions
similar to what you have.
Best Regards,
Les Geer
IBM z/VM and Linux Development
>Dennis,
>
>Thanks for the feedback. These were all set to 1 in our NJEDE
Colin,
We specify (via NJEDEF) a value of two for each of the parameters: JRNUM,
JTNUM, SRNUM, STNUM
I agree with Jim; its time for a PMR.
Dennis
Colin--I was thinking about Amadeus last week anyway. I am still shaking
my head in disbelief that last week, 4 years ago, I was sitting there with
job offers from Amadeus, MIT, and Cornell. I have always said that in 20
years I hope that I'm not sitting in a rocking chair in my nursing home
Perhaps Les Geer will be back on Wednesday unless he's on vacation.
Sorry about the dig about the 4th of July the other day. "The devil made
me do it"
Jim
At 11:47 AM 7/3/2006, you wrote:
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 0056C13BC12571A0_=
Content-Type: text/plain;
Jim,
Thanks, I think you are right. I was
sort of coming to that conclusion myself despite the great help from Dennis
& yourself.
At least you have helped me eliminate
a few possibles before going that route.
I will open a PMR and see how far I
get.
Colin
Jim Bohnsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wro
Time for the support center
Jim
At 11:20 AM 7/3/2006, you wrote:
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 00543F38C12571A0_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Dennis,
Thanks for the feedback. These were all set to 1 in our NJEDEF. I have now
got our MVS sysprog to
Dennis,
Thanks for the feedback. These were
all set to 1 in our NJEDEF. I have now got our MVS sysprog to set them
all to 2 in the JES line definitions and I have set the RSCS streams parameter
to 2. What I am not sure is how these relate together correct and if this
is correct.
Should the RSCS
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
ARK.EDU> Re: RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic
CTC (Non-SNA)
Dennis,
Thanks for the example. I have forwarded
this to our MVS sysprog asking how it compares to our current JES definition.
I will speak to her on Monday and see what she says.
One question, (because I am an MVS illiterate),
where is the number of streams defined on the JES side? Is there a s
Jim,
Thanks for that - it made me look again.
I thought we were completely up to date on RSCS maintenance but I see that
this system did have old LOADLIBs from March 1999. I have now corrected
this and will try again on Monday.
Colin
Jim Bohnsack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Wrote:
Colin--I'm striking o
CTED] Subject
ARK.EDU> RSCS NJE link to MVS over Basic CTC
(Non-SNA)
Colin--I'm striking out as far as getting the info I know used to be
there. I found what possibly could be the problem on
VM.IBM.com/RELATED/RSCS.
P4:
I installed RSCS RSU 9801 or 9802, now I am having NJE link problems
A4:
CP APARS VM61399 and VM61468 as well as RSCS APAR VM61888 must be
app
Jim,
Thanks - any suggestions are welcome.
None of the files going over this link are particularly large so,
normally, 1 stream would suffice. What I am not sure about is if 2 streams
would increase or decrease the conflicts I am seeing.
However, as both sides match, I guess
this is something
Colin--Again, it's been a long time, but I'll see if the shop that I was in
before still has the NJE connection and will try to get the JES and RSCS
definitions. I don't remember if we had more than one stream. I am pretty
sure that even a single stream can handle sending and receiving at the
Hi Jim,
Thanks for your response. At the moment
we have 1 stream defined on both MVS and VM.
My supposition is that the problem occurs
when both sides try to open a stream at the same time (but that could be
a red herring).
Again it is only my guess but I am supposing
that SNANJE handles 2 wa
Colin--It's been 7-8 years since I put in a plain NJE connection between an
MVS and a VM system. We had had SNANJE connections for a long time, but
for performance reasons, wanted to add an additional NJE link, leaving the
SNANJE link in place. I don't remember any special gyrations I had to g
I am not sure if anyone can give me
any advice on this.
Between our VM systems we use TCPNJE
for RSCS links. This leaves us with only a few links to MVS using SNANJE.
(Our MVS people expect to have TCPNJE support installed in Q1/Q2 next year).
All terminal traffic to VM is now migrated
to TCPIP
23 matches
Mail list logo
