Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Dave Jones
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 6:17 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Sevice level
My opinion of this is:
1) it should support all of the components of z/VM and
0, 2011 3:28 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Sevice level
What I would like:
1) a flag for the output of Q CPLEVEL that indicates that
additional service beyond the displayed level has been
applied. Something like 8801++.
Applying the next RSU would reset the flag until the next PTF
out
On 4/11/11 11:54 AM, "Schuh, Richard" wrote:
>That would be nice. It ought to also have a way to answer Marcy's
>question, "Has PTF xxx been applied to the system (or, perhaps, to a
>specified module)?" without having to wade through a list of the universe
>of PTFs.
PIPE COMMAND SERVICE LIST CP
Sunday, April 10, 2011 3:28 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Sevice level
>
> What I would like:
>
> 1) a flag for the output of Q CPLEVEL that indicates that
> additional service beyond the displayed level has been
> applied. Something like 8801++.
>
release level of the product and displays a list of parts and their latest
APAR levels.
Mike Donovan
From: Mark Wheeler
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: 04/11/2011 09:32 AM
Subject:Re: Sevice level
Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System
TCPSLVL let's you see se
TCPSLVL let's you see service level of TCPIP components on a module-by-module
basis.
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group
> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 20:31:37 -0500
> From: marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
> Subject: Re: Sevice level
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>
>
> TC
What I would like:
1) a flag for the output of Q CPLEVEL that indicates that additional service
beyond the displayed level has been applied. Something like 8801++.
Applying the next RSU would reset the flag until the next PTF outside the RSU
is applied.
2) a new option to SERVICE that does the
I don't see how any sort of meaningful number could be assigned to an
entity to reflect COR service. Everyone will have their own. An RSU
OTOH, "floats everybody's boat" to the same level, at least for a
while. About the only thing you (IBM) could do is to add a flag that
some service had be
.
Marcy
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Sevice level
Following up on Nick Harris' expectation to see a change to QUERY
I would like that associated with some definitive criteria of system
integration quality assurance; e.g., validated to some level of assurance
that the component plays nicely with other components at various
service levels of their own.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
> Follow
Following up on Nick Harris' expectation to see a change to QUERY CPLEVEL
after applying COR service to CP, I'd like to open a discussion on how
folks perceive service levels. That is, is there some way that you feel
IBM should express the concept of 'service level'?
For the sake of discussion
11 matches
Mail list logo
