I would like that associated with some definitive criteria of system integration quality assurance; e.g., validated to some level of assurance that the component plays nicely with other components at various service levels of their own.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Alan Altmark <alan_altm...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Following up on Nick Harris' expectation to see a change to QUERY CPLEVEL > after applying COR service to CP, I'd like to open a discussion on how > folks perceive service levels. That is, is there some way that you feel > IBM should express the concept of 'service level'? > > For the sake of discussion, let us assert that: > - We are talking about the running entity, not the copy of the entity on > the build disk. > - Unless there are specific pre-reqs or co-reqs, PTFs can be applied in > any order or combination. > - Each component (CP, CMS, DIRMAINT, RACF, SES, etc.) has its own service > stream > > Regards, > Alan > > z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant > IBM System Lab Services and Training > ibm.com/systems/services/labservices > office: 607.429.3323 > alan_altm...@us.ibm.com >
