Re: VM-VTAM/VSCS question

2007-05-06 Thread David Boyes
Or just buy PVM and leave the driving to us! :-) Well, if it didn't take a special bid on IFLs(hint, hint) On the other hand, the PVM line protocol isn't that complicated if you have tools to talk to a CTC. It wouldn't be that hard to use a Linux guest to implement most of what Tom wants.

Re: VM-VTAM/VSCS question

2007-05-05 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 05/04/2007 at 02:05 MST, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't YVETTE also supplied strictly OCO with the three obligatory sample exits? If source code were available some enhancements like SNA functions (whatever they were talking about), TCP connectivity to other YVETTE

Re: VM-VTAM/VSCS question

2007-05-05 Thread Dave Wade
--- Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday, 05/04/2007 at 02:05 MST, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't YVETTE also supplied strictly OCO with the three obligatory sample exits? If source code were available some enhancements like SNA functions (whatever they

Re: VM-VTAM/VSCS question

2007-05-05 Thread Dave Wade
--- Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday, 05/04/2007 at 02:05 MST, Thomas Kern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't YVETTE also supplied strictly OCO with the three obligatory sample exits? If source code were available some enhancements like SNA functions (whatever they

VM-VTAM/VSCS question

2007-05-04 Thread Colin Allinson
The background to this question is that we have 95% of our VM users accessing the system via TCPIP TELNET sessions. However we have a handful of remote users still accessing us via SNA and efforts to convert these to IP seem to continually meet roadblocks. For a number of reasons we want to

Re: VM-VTAM/VSCS question

2007-05-04 Thread David Boyes
functions, or you could probably easily add SNA function to YVETTE. -Original Message- From: Colin Allinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Sent: 5/4/07 10:21 AM Subject: VM-VTAM/VSCS question The background to this question is that we have 95% of our VM

Re: VM-VTAM/VSCS question

2007-05-04 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 05/04/2007 at 03:18 AST, David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PVM might be an answer. It had both SNA and scripting capabilities, and its a pretty decent session manager. PVM comes with an SNA session manager (PVMG). The LU name you have associated with VSCS could be moved to

Re: VM-VTAM/VSCS question

2007-05-04 Thread Paul Raulerson
. -Original Message- From: Colin Allinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Sent: 5/4/07 10:21 AM Subject: VM-VTAM/VSCS question The background to this question is that we have 95% of our VM users accessing the system via TCPIP TELNET sessions. However

Re: VM-VTAM/VSCS question

2007-05-04 Thread Thomas Kern
Isn't YVETTE also supplied strictly OCO with the three obligatory sample exits? If source code were available some enhancements like SNA functions (whatever they were talking about), TCP connectivity to other YVETTE servers, CTC connectivity to other systems (VTAM on z/OS?), or maybe inbound ssh