Yup, some companies -- some legal departments -- make the profiling process
weirdly adversarial, if they even allow it to begin. There's no reason for
that, though, since the goal is simply to let companies brag about their
technological brilliance. And to let IBM and other vendors involved
Regarding z/Journal and Mainframe Executive being separate from IBM,
absolutely. Regarding the IBM magazine, also somewhat right: it's
produced/distributed by an external company, though with much editorial input
from IBM. But being a captive publication, articles are too often more product
Gabe, you know how much I hate getting pulled into these discussions. :-)
First, I totally agree that both the zJournal and IBM's S.M. provide a lot
of information and support for the mainframe. I also appreciate how
difficult it is to get customers to discuss their efforts due to
Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Gabe Goldberg
Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 11:07 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: acm/vmware
But it's generally tough recruiting profile subjects, even
though the process isn't burdensome or threatening. Sites can
give
mainframes are
few and far between.
However, after MVMUG IBM presentations, some how it still
gives me hope that z/VM will survive well into the future in one form or
another.
--- On Mon, 4/5/10, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote:
From: Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
Subject: Re: acm/vmware
Right. Mainframe stories (profiles, business cases, success stories,
white papers, they have many names) appear in such places as z/Journal
(with a technical slant), Mainframe Executive (aimed at management),
IBM's Web site, IBM's Systems Magazine (Mainframe Edition), and other
industry
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
There has been one: Back in 2007-2008, there was The Grail from IBM's
Stop Talking, Start Doing campaign. (Not to be confused with a 2004 IBM
infrastructure ad of the same name.)
:-)
Subject: acm/vmware
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 2010, 11:07 AM
The listserv sent me a message my post didn't go out, so try again.
If you go to conferences such as CMG (Computer Management Group), that has been
a mainframe organization (meaning MVS or z/OS) since it started
Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 10:54 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: acm/vmware
Well the simple reason you see VMware all over the place is because there are
10-100 times or more PC type computers and IBM
z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: acm/vmware
Yep, and remember the commercials about how someone ?stole? the servers,
and it turned out they were all together on the IBM Blade servers. You do
not see any commercials for any IBM z
True.. and I've seen the original mainframe version many times. But,
what I find on YouTube right now
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kbn_MUfTG0E) is a version for the IBM
virtualization engine and blade center. To my eye, the whole
commercial is exactly the same as the original except for the
On Friday, 04/02/2010 at 11:04 EDT, Edward M Martin emar...@aultman.com
wrote:
Yep, and remember the commercials about how someone ?stole? the servers,
and it
turned out they were all together on the IBM Blade servers. You do not
see any
commercials for any IBM z boxes or z software.
The listserv sent me a message my post didn't go out, so try again.
If you go to conferences such as CMG (Computer Management Group), that
has been a mainframe organization (meaning MVS or z/OS) since it
started, our VM has never been represented, but VMWare now has many
sessions. It's
13 matches
Mail list logo
