to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM mode LPARs
Interesting; I did consider that...
Is this how IBM says you should do it?
(PS. Do you really run 5 virtual CPUs in all of your Linux guests?)
Marcy
This message may
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM mode LPARs
Interesting; I did consider that...
Is this how IBM says you should do it?
(PS. Do you really run 5 virtual CPUs in all of your Linux guests
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Michael Coffinmichaelcof...@mccci.com wrote:
PS: Yes, we've given each Linux server 5 virtual CPU's, which map to
two real IFLs. Our thinking on this is that the Linux guest should
dispatch more work simultaneously with 5 CPU's (and the two real IFLs
can
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM mode LPARs
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Michael Coffinmichaelcof...@mccci.com
wrote:
PS: Yes, we've given each Linux server 5 virtual CPU's, which map to
two real IFLs. Our thinking
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Michael Coffinmichaelcof...@mccci.com wrote:
Our environment meets all three of the items on your bulleted list.
If so, then you can give that single server two virtual CPUs, to match
the number of real IFLs defined.
PS Clearly this is not a common situation to
Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 8:32 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM mode LPARs
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Michael Coffinmichaelcof...@mccci.com
wrote:
Our
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Michael Coffin
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 7:43 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM mode LPARs
Hi Rob,
I'm inclined to agree with you re: virtual CPU count
On Thursday, 08/20/2009 at 07:28 EDT, Michael Coffin
michaelcof...@mccci.com wrote:
I actually scoured the z/VM 5.4 doc looking for a documented method of
doing this, but did not find anything specific. I had assumed it would
probably be the CPU directory record that we would use to do this,
Altmark
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 6:28 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM mode LPARs
On Thursday, 08/20/2009 at 07:28 EDT, Michael Coffin
michaelcof...@mccci.com wrote:
I actually scoured the z/VM 5.4 doc looking for a
documented method of
doing this, but did not find
On Thursday, 08/20/2009 at 07:28 EDT, Michael Coffin
michaelcof...@mccci.com wrote:
I actually scoured the z/VM 5.4 doc looking for a documented method of
doing this, but did not find anything specific. I had assumed it would
probably be the CPU directory record that we would use to do this,
On Thursday, 08/20/2009 at 02:08 EDT, Marcy Cortes
marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
And that's fine. Just need to know how to do it. Maybe the Planning
and
Admin manual could be updated under the CPU statement in the directory
saying
that if need to change the type of a CPU to use
ESA 5
Works like a charm. :)
-Mike
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 7:09 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: z/VM mode LPARs
In a z10 LPAR that is defined as the new
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Michael Coffin
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 4:19 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z/VM mode LPARs
I used the COMMAND records in the directory entry to set up my machines
to have 5 virtual CPUs all
13 matches
Mail list logo
