I don't see what is wrong. They have been running the root servers for too
long and they are now trying to make some money out of it.
And they only do it for invalid domains. It is much better than pop up ads
in flash that cover the screen.
I would think this is a legitimate way of making money.
I don't see any reason why you can't download and use
it for your testing and development purposes.
--- Arindam Dey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry people,
Forgot to put in the oracle site link. My apologies.
http://oss.oracle.com
--
Arindam Dey
The mind is not a vessel to be
On Friday, September 19, 2003 3:17 PM [GMT+0800=SGT],
Tarun Upadhyay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can somebody more knowledgeable enlighten me on what kind of
things I can expect to break because of this from a system
administration point of view and how can they be repaired.
(just the facts
On Friday, September 19, 2003 1:25 PM [GMT+0800=SGT],
Arindam Dey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to think that Oracle is licensed software.
It is.
According to the license and yes I did bother to read some part
of it. It says that I can use it for developing and
prototyping your
Yes,
I know lot of people do the same. This has been a convention in
Sendmail world for long.
However :
A) how does it help prevent spam (I can very well send you mail faking
[EMAIL PROTECTED])? In fact, most spammers not just uses a legitimate
domain name, they even exploit the open
On Thu, 2003-09-18 at 13:56, Tarun Upadhyay wrote:
I propose to hold the meeting at my office.
The address is:
Induslogic Inc.
4th Floor, Picadilly House
276, Capt Gaur Marg,
Srinivaspuri
Delhi 110065, India.
P: +91.11.5170.9070
F:
Tarun Upadhyay wrote:
I don't see what is wrong. They have been running the root servers for too
long and they are now trying to make some money out of it.
Huh? They have not been running the root name servers for free! AFAIK,
every registrar has to pay them for every domain registered under
--- Sanjeev \Ghane\ Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: On Friday, September 19, 2003 1:25 PM
[GMT+0800=SGT],
full oracle version is not free.
Arindam Dey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I used to think that Oracle is licensed software.
It is.
According to the license and yes I did bother
Dear Tarun,
The issue of technical problems cropping up due to this also looks
exaggerated to me. Clearly, any danger to SMTP servers can not be a concern
as they would probably add wildcards for A type record and not MX
records.
I can't understand the full impact of this problem because I'm
As such, I do not accept (spam?) from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With this change, nosuchdoamin.com will seem to exist.
The rest is left as an exercise to the reader ;-)
The rest is bigger than the bit you've chosen to highlight. :)
Shuvam
___
ilugd
Dear all,
I saw some very strange behaviour of device files on Linux recently,
thanks to a colleague. Can partly explain it, after all these years
working with Unix, but my explanation has holes.
I'll explain the phenomenon not as I experienced it, but in brief, so
that you don't have to
dear all,
after a user successfully logs in to a kde desktop, i want the system to
automatically run a script, launch some applications, etc.
for this, a few days ago i tried customising rc.local, until i realized
rc.local does its stuff *before* startx.
then, i google-searched, and discovered
Dear All,
India Linux Users Group - Delhi, is proud to announce the upcoming event - ILUG-Delhi
Monthly Meeting. Please visit the ILUG-D web site and RSVP online if you plan on
attending it.
Here are the complete details:
What: ILUG-Delhi Monthly Meeting
When: Sun Sep 21, 2003, 14:00
Where:
On Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:31 AM [GMT+0800],
John W. Krahn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: What Big Tobacco can learn from Microsoft
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ronald F. Guilmette)
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.email
Some fresh Windoze bugs were announced today:
http://lwn.net/Articles/49665/
The anticipated announcement by Red Hat, Inc. about the future direction of
the Red Hat Linux Project, originally scheduled for publishing early this
week, was rudely postponed by the imminent arrival of hurricane Isabel in
North Carolina. But even as preparations
dear bhaskar,
yes! the following techniques you suggest are working :
quoteif you are using KDE, use the ~/.kde/Autostart folder. Put the
script or a link to it and it should start after X loads.
In GNOME, use ~/.Xclients-default to load your programs.quote
however, the following
dear bhaskar,
you wrote:
Hi LL,
Have u chmodded the executable bit of .xinitrc file?
The /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession checks this before running
the user's xinitrc script.
Also, xdm uses the .xsession file instead. So try
symlinking the file:
ln -s .xinitrc .xsession
***
before i get into another
LL == linuxlingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LL [snip]
LL so if i have a user on my machine who decides to boot into any
LL random environment, the apps i want working on his/her logging
LL into runlevel 5, will disappear.
The app shouldn't be started by the user in that case.
Hello sir,
I will attend the meeting.
With Regards
Yogesh Anand
Dear All,
India Linux Users Group - Delhi, is proud to
announce the upcoming event - ILUG-Delhi Monthly
Meeting. Please visit the ILUG-D web site and RSVP
online if you plan on attending it.
Here are the complete details:
then, i google-searched, and discovered i need to have a hidden script
file, .xinitrc in the home directory, which would do the trick. the file
did not exist, so i created it. i tried this, and it did not work either.
finally, i re-googled and discovered a hidden .xsession file needs to be
before i get into another twisted spin of checking out various
permutations,
is the .xinitrc file supposed to be a shell script, with the
#!/usr/bin/bash line as the first line and the relevant commands following,
with the file chmodded to execute,
or
is it supposed to be a plain file
Raj Mathur [9/19/2003 6:55 PM] :
Anyone else experiencing STARTTLS weirdness after upgrading Sendmail?
I'm not able to have clients authenticate to the server anymore (even
when both the client and the server are the same machine) after
upgrading Sendmail after the latest advisory.
Certificates
Suresh == Suresh Ramasubramanian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Suresh Raj Mathur [9/19/2003 6:55 PM] :
Anyone else experiencing STARTTLS weirdness after upgrading
Sendmail? I'm not able to have clients authenticate to the
server anymore (even when both the client and the server
Raj Mathur [9/20/2003 9:12 AM] :
Where can I find this?
Threads on comp.mail.sendmail
Suresh What error are you getting in your logs? This is from
Suresh cf/README ...
verify=FAIL.
That is ok - as long as the mail gets through.
You'd normally have to present a client CERT signed using
Raj Mathur [9/20/2003 10:38 AM] :
The certificates are OK, they are read when Sendmail starts up, they
were working up to yesterday (before the upgrade).
BTW, the logs are from my local machine, but the remote server also
exhibits the same behaviour.
Did you by any chance upgrade openssl in the
25 matches
Mail list logo
