> A paid, non-free version can narrow down the
> location to the
> city. What costs money is the database, not the
> programme itself, if I
> understand the program correctly.
[SNIP]
for those who are looking for how to look for
location of ipaddress , here it is :
http://www.networld
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 19:17, vivek wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 23:49 -0700, Amit Sharma wrote:
> > they will be using openoffice and mozilla and few
> > other standard applications. they will conect to
> > oracle application server using browser to work on
> > oracle forms for data entry , repor
[Please upgrade cdrecord on all platforms -- Raju]
This is an RFC 1153 digest.
(1 message)
--
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Mandrake Linux Security Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Amit" == Amit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Amit> [snip]
Amit> please help me decide, should i go for Xandros?
No, You want your business to continue working even if Xandros dies
tomorrow. Go for a community-supported distribut
--- Amit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> so u think LTSP for 30 users are not a good choice,
> right? VK says its not a good idea, u think same.
Hey Amit! when did i said its not a good idea, i just
cautioned you. I know the kind of machuines you have
got in your office (if you haven't ch
Hi,
I have done a costing for 100 PCs
wired-lan + fiber backbone
wireless-lan(11g) with fiber backbone.
The wifi lan is actually cheaper by 2 lakhs and the
benefits outweigh the cons!!
=
catch ya later (Ive gotta UnWire Life!!!)
shiv
__
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 07:00 -0700, Amit Sharma wrote:
> > 30 clients. and running oracle on that as well as
> > using ltsp..uh think
> > about it.
> >
> oracle will be installed on seperate server, users
> will access oracle forms using the browsers.
>
> so u think LTSP for 30 users are not a goo
You rule. I am senile...
BR,
N
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 vivek wrote :
>On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 14:07 +, Nishant Kavi wrote:
> >
> >
> > >is it ok to go ahead. >> ASK SONU TIWARI (the esteemed h/w engg) as
> > well!
> > -
[snip]
> also,
> yu'll need a backup too
> in case of any hardware issues, the server should be
> robust in case of
> 30 clients. and running oracle on that as well as
> using ltsp..uh think
> about it.
>
oracle will be installed on seperate server, users
will access oracle forms using the browser
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 14:07 +, Nishant Kavi wrote:
>
>
> >is it ok to go ahead. >> ASK SONU TIWARI (the esteemed h/w engg) as
> well!
>
a little correction, abhilash tiw
Suggestion: Go for Oracle DB Release 9.2.x. The current DB 10g is still in 'early'
stages of its life.
But if you would really like to party w/ 10g then I have Qs for you -
a. Oracle 9iAS is running on which flavor (and version) of Linux?
b. Do you intend to run the DB on the same box (Applic
well,
RH Linux9.1 when expanded means...RedHat Linux9.1...
Just a small querry buddies...i got hold of August2003 Digit DVD
whic has RedHat Linux 9 installation...But is it advisable to install
linux from the DVD..
will i get all the features of Red Hat Linux...including the
Multimedia
[snip]
> also,
> yu'll need a backup too
> in case of any hardware issues, the server should be
> robust in case of
> 30 clients. and running oracle on that as well as
> using ltsp..uh think
> about it.
>
oracle will be installed on seperate server, users
will access oracle forms using the browser
hi,
any compatibility issues using 'Oracle Database 10g
with Oracle 9i AS on linux' or is it ok to go ahead.
amit
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo
___
On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 23:49 -0700, Amit Sharma wrote:
> hi,
>
> i am planning to install linux for 30 users in my
> office.
>
> they will be using openoffice and mozilla and few
> other standard applications. they will conect to
> oracle application server using browser to work on
> oracle forms f
--- Amit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> i am planning to install linux for 30 users in my
> office.
good!!!
>
> they will be using openoffice and mozilla and few
> other standard applications. they will conect to
> oracle application server using browser to work on
> oracle form
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What was that?? Why did it happen in the first
> place?? What are the basics about that "Character
> Device and Major and Minor numbers"??
Immediately check your filesystem by running
chkrootkit, you have probably picked up an infection.
I found this problem 3
Amit Sharma said on Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 09:48:32PM -0700,:
> mail header. does yahoo or anyother webmail have that
> much info in the header as to pinpoint the originating
> city of the sender?
Google for `geoiplookup'. It is there is debian main.
The free as in Freedom version narrows down
At 2004-09-08 16:00:59 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > System boots fine, but as soon as init scripts start, I start
> > getting lots of "FAIL" all indicating /dev/null : read only
> > filesystem.
Read that again. It says that the file system that /dev/null was on is
read-only, not that /dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 12:19, you wrote:
> hi,
>
> i am planning to install linux for 30 users in my
> office.
>
> they will be using openoffice and mozilla and few
> other standard applications. they will conect to
> oracle application server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 08 September 2004 13:15, you wrote:
> Yesterday I landed into this crisis, on my 64MB, P2-233MHz, FC1-GNOME,
> notebook:
>
> System boots fine, but as soon as init scripts start, I start getting lots
> of "FAIL" all indicating /dev/null :
Manoj Kr. Gupta wrote:
> They provide with ip address of the machine from where the message was
> transmitted to their server. Just do a whois on that ip and it will
> give u a fair idea of from where the mail originated.
Please don't bother the whois registry for every single mail you get.
Its a r
Yesterday I landed into this crisis, on my 64MB, P2-233MHz, FC1-GNOME, notebook:
System boots fine, but as soon as init scripts start, I start getting lots of "FAIL"
all indicating /dev/null : read only filesystem.
My god, I never faced this all my Linux experience. e2fsck's show clean filesyste
23 matches
Mail list logo
