On Monday 08 September 2008 12:21:18 narendra sisodiya wrote:
I have a question, Can I use Fedora 9 as a commercial use to develop
software. ?
has anybody studied its license policies ?
Actually generally compaies buy Redhat. Do we any exmple for Free of
cost or linux distro in companies ??
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Sandip Bhattacharya [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Monday 08 September 2008 12:21:18 narendra sisodiya wrote:
I have a question, Can I use Fedora 9 as a commercial use to develop
software. ?
has anybody studied its license policies ?
Actually generally
Thanks for this info, But, I was having impression that , you can not
attach a GPL packages with your peice of code for which will be shiped as
binary blobs, you have to open your source code also .. As per my
knowledge
, you can use LGPL in that case.
What I understand is that you can provide
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 20:22:18 Harish Pillay wrote:
Just so that the perception is not perpetuated, Fedora is not a poor
cousin of anything. It is the leading distribution that is
completely free (both in libre and beer) and open to anyone to add.
RHEL is downstream to Fedora. If
I have a question, Can I use Fedora 9 as a commercial use to develop
software. ?
Yes you can.
Actually generally compaies buy Redhat. Do we any exmple for Free of
cost or linux distro in companies ??
Yes we have. I work at a place which uses a mix of RHEL, CentOS and
Fedora as their servers
Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
1. Imagine how a SOHO business would react when a small time solution
provider pitches a solution based on Fedora and the client reads this:
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/migrate/whichlinux/
So how does CentOS Compare with facts on that page then ?
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Ref : At software list :- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
There are some packagse which are commercial restrictive.
Searching for the word restrictive only gave me this:
Note that any license change to a more
I am sorry, that time I have saw the pages clearly. there a words
Commercial use restrictions against the package openmotif -- I think
context is different.
Let us be specific.
Are those words still there? Do they contradict
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines or
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I am sorry, that time I have saw the pages clearly. there a words
Commercial use restrictions against the package openmotif -- I think
context is different.
Let us be specific.
Are those words still there? Do they
So lets suppose tomorrow they(fedora guys or in some other distro) pack
any package which has Commercial use restrictions -- Will I be able to
develop my application and sell it out.
No need to suppose such a thing. The packaging guidelines DO NOT ALLOW
such things to be a part of Fedora. Full
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Debarshi Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Do yourself a favour and learn to write some sane English.
Cheerio,
Debarshi
Ok Boss,
I trying to do this favour on me from last 3 years. I know i am not good
at my written English skills specially at spellings.
--
I have a question, Can I use Fedora 9 as a commercial use to develop
software. ?
has anybody studied its license policies ?
Actually generally compaies buy Redhat. Do we any exmple for Free of cost
or linux distro in companies ??
Ref : At software list :- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing
On Monday 08 Sep 2008, narendra sisodiya wrote:
I have a question, Can I use Fedora 9 as a commercial use to develop
software. ?
has anybody studied its license policies ?
Actually generally compaies buy Redhat. Do we any exmple for Free of
cost or linux distro in companies ??
Ref : At
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
narendra sisodiya writes:
I have a question, Can I use Fedora 9 as a commercial use to develop
software. ?
has anybody studied its license policies ?
Actually generally compaies buy Redhat. Do we any exmple for Free of cost
or linux distro in
14 matches
Mail list logo
