Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-23 Thread Sandip Bhattacharya
On Monday 22 September 2008 01:00:18 Gora Mohanty wrote: (b) Should Sarai, as an avowedly FOSS organisation, use proprietary software in a public demo? My opinion is no, but again I believe that this should be done through peer pressure, rather than outright banning. The person in

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-23 Thread Swapnil Bhartiya
Infiltrating the world of Windows and Mac with FOSS, getting them hooked on free software and eventually tempting them to try the OS itself, might just be a more effective way to get the masses in. (notice how the last line looks like something billg@ might have said about his OS several

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-23 Thread Sankarshan (সঙ্কর্ষণ)
Swapnil Bhartiya wrote: I admire that piece and completely agree with you. Instead of asking new users to relocate, lets put more and more FOSS things on windows. Once they are ok with Firefox, then OO.o...and much more, it won't be much of an issue pulling off Windows base and replace with

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-23 Thread shantanu goel
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Swapnil Bhartiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Infiltrating the world of Windows and Mac with FOSS, getting them hooked on free software and eventually tempting them to try the OS itself, might just be a more effective way to get the masses in. (notice how the

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-23 Thread Raj Mathur
On Tuesday 23 Sep 2008, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote: [snip] At the risk of a flame war debating between GPL and BSD licences, this is exactly the difference between the two licences, IMO of course. * GPL restricts complete freedom, by putting in conditions, for the higher goal of software

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-22 Thread gajendra khanna
Ravikant happened to be attending the event, and I believe it's his choice what OS he wants to use. It is his choice to use the OS he wants. Whats more important is that he was using Firefox on Winblows which is very much a FOSS product. (for running the launched site). Free software is

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-22 Thread Jeba Singh Emmanuel | जेबा सिंह ईम्म ेनुयेल
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:32 AM, gajendra khanna [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Ravikant happened to be attending the event, and I believe it's his choice what OS he wants to use. It is his choice to use the OS he wants. Whats more important is that he was using Firefox on Winblows which is very

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-22 Thread shantanu goel
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 22 Sep 2008, shantanu goel wrote: [snip] Now, instead of straightaway taking a call, my question is as to the why behind the particular pic in question. Is it because Linux was not able to fit the bill technically

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-22 Thread Gora Mohanty
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:42:19 +0530 Linux Lingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] though the software being shown may be gpl or equivalent, and sarai's contributions to the foss community commendable, i think we must take a call in principle, on the use of proprietary software at any foss event

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-22 Thread narendra sisodiya
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Gora Mohanty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:42:19 +0530 Linux Lingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] though the software being shown may be gpl or equivalent, and sarai's contributions to the foss community commendable, i think we must

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-22 Thread Gora Mohanty
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:37:47 +0530 narendra sisodiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Gora Mohanty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:42:19 +0530 Linux Lingam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] though the software being shown may be gpl or equivalent,

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-22 Thread narendra sisodiya
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Gora Mohanty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:37:47 +0530 narendra sisodiya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Gora Mohanty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:42:19 +0530 Linux Lingam [EMAIL

[ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-21 Thread Linux Lingam
dear all, heck! abhinavy2j rightly points out the irony and embarrassment of the use of microsoft windows, during the SFD. though the software being shown may be gpl or equivalent, and sarai's contributions to the foss community commendable, i think we must take a call in principle, on the use of

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-21 Thread Praveen A
2008/9/21 Linux Lingam [EMAIL PROTECTED]: heck! abhinavy2j rightly points out the irony and embarrassment of the use of microsoft windows, during the SFD. though the software being shown may be gpl or equivalent, We call it Freedom inside jail here. Cheers Praveen -- പ്രവീണ്‍

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-21 Thread Praveen A
2008/9/21 Jeba Singh Emmanuel | जेबा सिंह ईम्मेनुयेल [EMAIL PROTECTED]: setting a rule or policy to not use something, even in principle: is freedom? Shouldn't the users be deciding for themself? isn't that the whole idea? of whose? Can you give some references? Cheers Praveen -- പ്രവീണ്‍

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-21 Thread shantanu goel
Well, the questions are manifold here... Free Software or Software Freedom Day does not (and should not) restrict the propagation of the idea of freedom on any platform, be it windows or linux. Freedom inside jail is better than no freedom at all. I think the question put forth by Linux Lingam is

Re: [ilugd] Windblows on Software Freedom Day

2008-09-21 Thread Raj Mathur
On Monday 22 Sep 2008, shantanu goel wrote: [snip] Now, instead of straightaway taking a call, my question is as to the why behind the particular pic in question. Is it because Linux was not able to fit the bill technically for the activity involved? Or is it just because there wasn't any