-
From: Raj Mathur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 10/16/2003 5:38 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ilugd] Postgres vs oracle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ambar == Ambar Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Did some research over the weekend.
First of all some good news:
Heavy duty sites that run Postgres include;
A) RubyForge (rubyforge.org). They have 300K records. Not too many but
moderately high.
B) .org domain.
c) sourceforge used to run postgres. AFAIK, they moved out because IBM made
that a
The standard form of VACUUM is best used with the goal of maintaining a
fairly level steady-state usage of disk space. The standard form finds old
tuples and makes their space available for re-use within the table, but it
does not try very hard to shorten the table file and return disk space to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ambar == Ambar Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ambar [snip].
Ambar So does VACUUM require the database to be taken offline? Or
Ambar was this an issue with older versions of pgSQL? As I don't
Ambar see the Geocrawler under
Some more information, some numbers from mysql:
http://www.mysql.com/information/features.html
http://www.mysql.com/information/benchmarks-old.html
regards
shantanu
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 17:38:34 +0530, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ambar ==
Please check
http://formation.espacecourbe.com/choosing/dbc_crashMe20001011.html
and some comparision reports
http://formation.espacecourbe.com/choosing/
Regards
shantanu
On 16 Oct 2003 12:15:25 +0530, Tarun Dua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 11:35, Ambar Roy wrote:
Geocrawler
Mathur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 10/16/2003 5:38 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Cc:
Subject: Re: [ilugd] Postgres vs oracle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ambar == Ambar Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ambar == Ambar Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Surely NO...so we would certainly be interested to know some
of your
Ambar Biggest Internet Sites running on open source.
Geocrawler use Postgres.
Ambar Intresting thing about
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 19:58, Gurpreet Singh Sachdeva wrote:
Hi Tarun,
Let me make it very cleat that I don't have any hunch in open source
and thats why I am in the list but my dear, facts are facts.
(Is Amazon.com running on open source (database)? Is eBay.com running on open
I do'nt know for sure but as far as my memory goes.
sf.net started of with postgres and then moved on to use DB2 from IBM
because of scaling issues with postgres.
--
supreet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Tarun Dua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 10/14/2003 2:16 PM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Cc:
Subject: RE: [ilugd] Postgres vs oracle
On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 22:13, Gurpreet Singh Sachdeva wrote:
The strategy of employing
Gurpreet
SGkgVGFydW4sDQogICAgICAgICAgICAgICBMZXQgbWUgbWFrZSBpdCB2ZXJ5IGNsZWF0IHRoYXQg
Gurpreet
SSBkb24ndCBoYXZlIGFueSBodW5jaCBpbiBvcGVuIHNvdXJjZSBhbmQgdGhhdHMgd2h5IEkgYW0g
Gurpreet
aW4gdGhlIGxpc3QgYnV0IG15IGRlYXIsIGZhY3RzIGFyZSBmYWN0cy4NCihJcyBBbWF6b24uY29t
Gurpreet
Dear Tarun,
Comparison of PostgreSQL (open source) vis-a-vis Oracle (commercial) is UNFAIR! The
subject *should* be PostgeSQL vs Foxpro Ooops MySQL. PostgreSQL no doubt is a good
database BUT you can't match Oracle's superior technology. Its in the business for the
past 27 years (PostgreSQL
Hi Tarun,
I think you are trying to compare a Apple with a Water Melon. But any
case if you are really facing a real time scenario, please make it clear. what exactly
the application you are running and how many concurrent user you are expecting to be
there as concurrency is a
Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 2:32 AM
To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list; The Linux-Delhi mailing list
Subject: RE: [ilugd] Postgres vs oracle
Hi Tarun,
I think you are trying to compare a Apple with a Water Melon.
But any case if you are really facing a real time scenario, please make
15 matches
Mail list logo
