RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Scott Heath
DNSStuff.com has the look up tool that will redirect to the correct registrar. Thanks Scott for providing that for us. I have been using DNSStuff.com for a few years now, even before i knew it was tied to declude. The Other Scott -- Original Message -- Fro

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Mark
Wanna know who owns the IP go here http://www.arin.net/ for those that don't know about them. At 12:58 PM 4/13/2004, you wrote: I took it as a challenge too and checked my spambox. Took about 5 seconds to type "CTL-F" and search for .fr within just the spam folder. Out of currently 1313 pieces

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Chris Hunt
The basic AS stuff like SMTP Control access, Kill.lst and rules.ima takes care of this. Then can add V8 AS features and third party utilities like Declude/Phase/URLBL List manager to tighten the noose. Admining any email system takes some time which can be lessened by using 3rd utilities. It

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
http://www.spamlaws.com/docs/2002-58-ec.pdf > tons of IPs all over .it, .fr, .de, .uk, .pl, .be, .nl, .es Mostly > subscribers on cable/dsl/dialup netowks. As I said: zombies ...and the controllers of this zombies sits... who knows? I mean there are practically no more messages comming from t

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Markus Gufler
> My point isn't that I can prove that spam laws aren't > worthwhile. However, if you believe that once legislation is > passed all of the spammers will think to themselves, "The > party is over. Time to give up spamming and volunteer at an > Aids hospice.", you are incredibly naïve. Even if

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Bill Foresman
1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge > Please take 30 more seconds and find an email from a company, > and not a single person that is impossible to identify. I certainly understand your point. I would certainly support any legislation that would p

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Dave Riddle
I took it as a challenge too and checked my spambox. Took about 5 seconds to type "CTL-F" and search for .fr within just the spam folder. Out of currently 1313 pieces of email in there I found 40 that purport to be from a .fr address. Here are some from the first handful out of that list. Recei

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Markus Gufler
> tons of IPs all over .it, .fr, .de, .uk, .pl, .be, .nl, .es > Mostly subscribers on cable/dsl/dialup netowks. As I said: zombies ...and the controllers of this zombies sits... who knows? I mean there are practically no more messages comming from the own or neighbor countries sending marketin

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Paul Navarre
> Please take 30 more seconds and find an email from a company, > and not a single person that is impossible to identify. I certainly understand your point. I would certainly support any legislation that would provide penalties for spammers, the tougher the better. Clearly the laws in Europe hav

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Jason
riginal Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pierre Mengal Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge Please take 30 more seconds and find an email from a company, and not a single person that i

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Len Conrad
> Really? Funny... I still get plenty of spam in my spam > folder from EU addresses. Mailfrom or IP's? tons of IPs all over .it, .fr, .de, .uk, .pl, .be, .nl, .es Mostly subscribers on cable/dsl/dialup netowks. Len _ http://

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
avril 2004 19:22 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge > > For whatever it is worth, it took me less than 30 seconds to > find spam in my spambox from France. > > Actual message removed so it won't trip people's spam > filters. Na

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
Many thanks to Marius (private), Ed and Dave for answering my questions. Thanks to the others too for sharing with me their point of view. If you have those spam coming from companies based in EU, I'm really interested to see some of them. Forward them to me in private. Thanks ! Best regards,

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Paul Navarre
For whatever it is worth, it took me less than 30 seconds to find spam in my spambox from France. Actual message removed so it won't trip people's spam filters. Names changed to protect the innocent. Paul Navarre *** >From <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thu Apr 08 09:06:27 2004 Received:

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Markus Gufler
> Really? Funny... I still get plenty of spam in my spam > folder from EU addresses. Mailfrom or IP's? Markus To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitc

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Markus Gufler
> No it's real. Since that law, spam coming from EU countries > have almost completely stopped. > > Of course I'm in Belgium, I can't say it is the same in other > EU countries... But I think it is the same in most of them. Italy speaking here and I can confirm this. Spam comming from local or

Re: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Bruce Demske
> Almost all spam I get are coming from US. I'm sure it will help. I agree that it will help but only for a little while. My company aggressively pursues junk faxers and 99/100 these days are doing business in Canada (the vast majority) or the Caribbean. I can't imagine that it will be much dif

Re: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Len Conrad
We are really infested by spam, and this is becoming a serious problem. We can't spend so many time to sort real spam and and customer emails. So sometimes, a customer email is put into quarantine, which is a disaster. c/r breaks all kinds of mail, esp send-only servers like travel reservations

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
> >The only thing that will reduce spam is solid laws in US. > > How will a "Federal" law passed in Washington DC (let alone a > law passed by a State, City, etc...) affect how a spammer > operating in Costa Rica, China or Korea goes about his "business"? Almost all spam I get are coming from U

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Scott Heath
It won't even affect US spammers as they just move their operations off shore to Asia. -- Original Message -- From: Dave Riddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:57:10 -0700 > >> >>The only thing that will reduce s

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
Please post at least one them coming from a real company based in EU. I'm really interested. Very little spam comes from legitimate companies. Spam typically comes from shady people who operate without regard to the law. If the spam comes from a legitimate company, they almost certainly either

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Dave Riddle
The only thing that will reduce spam is solid laws in US. How will a "Federal" law passed in Washington DC (let alone a law passed by a State, City, etc...) affect how a spammer operating in Costa Rica, China or Korea goes about his "business"? To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Don Kiiskila
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pierre Mengal Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 10:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge > > I already replied to those arguments in my past emails. > > No you have not. &

AW: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Admin-ML
n of every mail, because often just browsing this column tells you if and where a valid mail can be. >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von >Pierre Mengal >Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2004 17:24 >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
Have you ever calculated the time you spend to check a spam quarantine ? It is the same time you have to select and delete email from your inbox folder. FWIW, we here must view every single E-mail that arrives. However, when there are 200 spams that come in overnight, it only takes me about 30

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
Send me one from France please (paste it here with the full header please) > Then France and Germany must not be in the EU has I get a > ton-o-crap from these countries. > > This tread is hopeless, plonk filter has been set ;) Chris > > > > >No it's real. Since that law, spam coming from EU

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
Please post at least one them coming from a real company based in EU. I'm really interested. > Really? Funny... I still get plenty of spam in my spam > folder from EU addresses. > > At 10:32 AM 4/13/2004, you wrote: > > > > I already replied to those arguments in my past emails. > > > > > > No

Re: AW: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Dave Riddle
sendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2004 16:57 >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge > >Pierre, > >I think our user base is about the same as yours. We too were >overrun with >spam until we implemented IMail's Antivirus settings. At the >beginning

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
Posting such mail do not make you a great guy. Do I need to forward you all messages I had from friendly users that replied to my questions ? Please be more professionnal in the future. Pierre > My Fellow IMail admins.. Pierre's mind is set. There is no hope... > > Just let him be and hopefu

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Chris Hunt
Then France and Germany must not be in the EU has I get a ton-o-crap from these countries. This tread is hopeless, plonk filter has been set ;) Chris No it's real. Since that law, spam coming from EU countries have almost completely stopped. Of course I'm in Belgium, I can't say it is the same

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Mark
Really? Funny... I still get plenty of spam in my spam folder from EU addresses. At 10:32 AM 4/13/2004, you wrote: > > I already replied to those arguments in my past emails. > > No you have not. > > > The only thing that will reduce spam is solid laws in US. > > And you are living in a fantasy

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Dave Riddle
I'm interested. Will you be ready to share with me your settings ? Here are our settings: DNS Black Lists Tab bl.spamcop.net list.dsbl.org dnsbl.ahbl.org dnsbl.njabl.org sbl-xbl-spamhaus.org opm.blitzed.org relays.ordb.org multihop.dsbl.org Verify MAIL FROM address Delete afte

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Chris Hunt
My Fellow IMail admins.. Pierre's mind is set. There is no hope... Just let him be and hopefully he will go away. Chris At 05:12 PM 04/13/2004 +0200, you wrote: I already replied to those arguments in my past emails. The only thing that will reduce spam is solid laws in US. Or another soluti

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
> > I already replied to those arguments in my past emails. > > No you have not. > > > The only thing that will reduce spam is solid laws in US. > > And you are living in a fantasy land. Depending on > politicians to solve a problem is seeking a disaster. No it's real. Since that law, spam com

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> I already replied to those arguments in my past emails. No you have not. > The only thing that will reduce spam is solid laws in US. And you are living in a fantasy land. Depending on politicians to solve a problem is seeking a disaster. > Sometimes I ask myself how those spammers know all my

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
> >Have you ever lost an important customer email in your spam > filter ? I > >did. > >And it's like all bad experience, you will never want that > experience > >again. > > You might want to set up an extra mailbox that contains all > spam. Check it daily for false positives. We are forwardin

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Mark
Like my daddy used to say... wish in one hand and dudu in the hand and see which one gets filled first. They're right, unfortunately, fighting spam is an ongoing job. I used to think like you but finally saw the light. I now spend much too much time keeping up with the spammers and their tri

AW: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Admin-ML
>Have you ever lost an important customer email in your spam >filter ? I did. >And it's like all bad experience, you will never want that >experience again. You might want to set up an extra mailbox that contains all spam. Check it daily for false positives. We are forwarding all spam messages t

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Dave Riddle
It sounds to me like you never set up your filters properly. There should be no reason that you "Lose" an e-mail due to filters. If you are deleting e-mail based on a single test(s), then no system in the world will protect you from yourself. I'm not being hard on you, it's true. Absolutely! I

AW: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Admin-ML
. >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- >Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Dave Riddle >Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. April 2004 16:57 >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Betreff: RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge > >Pierre, > >I think our user base is about the same as

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
I already replied to those arguments in my past emails. The only thing that will reduce spam is solid laws in US. Or another solution is to make everybody in the world have a big *censored* and with heavy *censored* performances... Sometimes I ask myself how those spammers know all my problems ;

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
> Pierre, > > I think our user base is about the same as yours. We too > were overrun with spam until we implemented IMail's Antivirus > settings. At the beginning we had them set to strict and go > to many false positives. If you saw my email the other day > you would see that we are VER

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> Have you ever lost an important customer email in your spam filter ? I did. > And it's like all bad experience, you will never want that experience again. > > The Imail built in spam filter is a nightmarre. Client-Side filter work, but > we can't impose all our customers. I do not use the Imail

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Dave Riddle
Pierre, I think our user base is about the same as yours. We too were overrun with spam until we implemented IMail's Antivirus settings. At the beginning we had them set to strict and go to many false positives. If you saw my email the other day you would see that we are VERY HAPPY with our

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
> >> > >>Have you ever lost an important customer email in your spam > filter ? I > did. And it's like all bad experience, you will never want > that experience again. > >> > >>The Imail built in spam filter is a nightmarre. Client-Side filter > work, but we can't impose all our customers. > >

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Scott Heath
Why not run ASSP (free) add an X Header to each peice of mail. then set a global rule that if the msg has Spam Yes as an X Header dump it into a spam folder, and set a max size on it. That way, if there is a false positive then the user can log into web mail/IMAP4 and retrieve the message.

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Jason
>> >>Have you ever lost an important customer email in your spam filter ? I did. And it's like all bad experience, you will never want that experience again. >> >>The Imail built in spam filter is a nightmarre. Client-Side filter work, but we can't impose all our customers. It sounds to me like y

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
> > I completely understand what you say. But please understand > I already > > considered those "issues" and that my decision to use a such system > > was thinked before. The antispam feature of Imail is > unsecure, and my > customers > > urge me to provide them a spam challenge system. I will

Re: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Len Conrad
We too offer a gateway service that has a slightly better accuracy rate than Brightmail, and, of course is a less expensive option. IMGate is an in-house gateway service that is the least expensive option Len _ http://MenAndMic

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> I completely understand what you say. But please understand I already > considered those "issues" and that my decision to use a such system was > thinked before. The antispam feature of Imail is unsecure, and my customers > urge me to provide them a spam challenge system. I will use myself that >

Re: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Doug White
http://www.clickdoug.com==     - Original Message - From: Michael E. Trendel To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 7:55 AM Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge We are using a product called Brightmail

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Markus Gufler
> The antispam feature of > Imail is unsecure, and my customers urge me to provide them a > spam challenge system. I don't know the Antispam features offered by Imail v8+ but maybe give a 30day free try to Declude available under www.declude.com It's like a swiss army knife. Markus To Uns

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Michael E. Trendel
t: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 6:26 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge Hello,   We are really infested by spam, and this is becoming a serious problem. We can't spend so many time to sort real spam and and customer emails. So sometimes, a customer em

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
> > We will probably move from Imail to Merak then. I don't > think IpSwitch > > will forget that market I'm a part of. > > Pierre, > > I have to strongly agree with Scott! > If you want to integrate a C/R system several people will > consider this as spam. (exactly the opposite you want in yo

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Markus Gufler
> We will probably move from Imail to Merak then. I don't think > IpSwitch will forget that market I'm a part of. Pierre, I have to strongly agree with Scott! If you want to integrate a C/R system several people will consider this as spam. (exactly the opposite you want in your inbox!) Some of

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Ed Butler \(49pence\)
> > > If not is it planned ? > > > > I highly doubt it. > > We will probably move from Imail to Merak then. I don't think > IpSwitch will forget that market I'm a part of. > Merak is a very comprehensive product - but beware of stabiity issues. We changed to Imail from Merak. I'm not complete

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
> OK, but *PLEASE* do not become a spammer. Of course no. > > If not is it planned ? > > I highly doubt it. We will probably move from Imail to Merak then. I don't think IpSwitch will forget that market I'm a part of. > > If no, what are the third party solutions ? > > I don't have a list

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
> [1] You end up being a spammer (the majority of spam sent to > you will result in confirmation requests being sent to > innocent victims) [2] Spammers now send pretend confirmation > requests, presumably to make people less likely to respond to > C/R requests [3] Many people respond to C/R reque

RE: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de R. > Scott Perry > Envoyé : mardi 13 avril 2004 13:05 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge > > > >We tested the challenge system of some customers, an

Re: [IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread R. Scott Perry
We tested the challenge system of some customers, and this is the solution we need. However, we don't know how to enable that in Imail 8.1. Is it possible ? If not is it planned ? If yes when ? If no, what are the third party solutions ? No, fortunately IMail v8's anti-spam does not include thi

[IMail Forum] Spam Challenge

2004-04-13 Thread Pierre Mengal
Hello,   We are really infested by spam, and this is becoming a serious problem. We can't spend so many time to sort real spam and and customer emails. So sometimes, a customer email is put into quarantine, which is a disaster.   We tested the challenge system of some customers, and this is