Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Dan Lukes wrote: On 17.7.2018 20:56, David B Funk wrote: Not to mention, for years Mark Crispin adamantly opposed anything greater than 32 bit code (for portability sake). So there may still be dark corners of the UW/Panda IMAP code that will break on a 64 bit system

Re: [Imap-uw] mbox file size limitations?

2018-07-17 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Dan Lukes wrote: GLEN HERRMANNSFELDT wrote on 17. 7. 2018 3:35: Many C implementations using 32 bit int have a 2G file size limit. This happens even if there are no fseek() calls. Moreover, even on those systems having larger int, there's an issue somewhere in the

Re: [Imap-uw] ftp

2018-04-08 Thread David B Funk
On Sat, 7 Apr 2018, GLEN HERRMANNSFELDT wrote: I did know about Mark, but that doesn't explain why ftp.cac.washington.edu is gone. I'd guess that's either an "oops" that nobody there has noticed yet or a conscious decision to shut down something that they've long deprecated. I did find

Re: [Imap-uw] SSL and systemd

2017-09-15 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Dan Lukes wrote: Andrew Daviel wrote: I have panda-imap running on CentOS 7 with xinetd. We wanted to implement it using a systemd service instead The server appears to work on port 143 with STARTTLS (or notls) But on port 993 it responds with plaintext. Well, I have

Re: [Imap-uw] SSL and systemd

2017-09-15 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Andrew Daviel wrote: I have panda-imap running on CentOS 7 with xinetd. We wanted to implement it using a systemd service instead, so I made files /usr/lib/systemd/system/imaps@.service imaps.socket imap.socket imap@.service The server appears to work on port 143 with

Re: [Imap-uw] Patch for TLS 1.2 DHE* cipher support in uwimap/panda?

2017-04-06 Thread David B Funk
I've actually got a working version of the DH Params code working (fought thru it last night). My current issue is how to excerpt it to make a patch that can be applied to the published code base. As I've been hacking at the UW/Panda imap code base for more than 15 years, I've got a lot of

Re: [Imap-uw] Patch for TLS 1.2 DHE* cipher support in uwimap/panda?

2017-04-06 Thread David B Funk
That's a nicely done patch, I wish I had seen it sooner. Only suggestion I have would be to make the default protocols & ciphers stronger given the current known SSL vulnerabilities. EG: sslProtocols = cpystr("ALL -SSLv2 -SSLv3"); /* default protocols */ sslCipherList =

Re: [Imap-uw] Patch for TLS 1.2 DHE* cipher support in uwimap/panda?

2017-04-05 Thread David B Funk
A couple of years ago I started working on exactly this feature (when the SSL v3 storm hit). I extended the env_unix.c module to add config file parsing options for a 'SSLCipherSuite' parameter that works the same as the Apache version and started work on a 'DHParameters' parameter that would

Re: [Imap-uw] inbox corruption by iphone

2015-08-01 Thread David B Funk
Have you tried the Panda IMAP distro? https://github.com/jonabbey/panda-imap The mailbox locking problem can be avoided by using an alternate form of mailbox (such as MIX) instead of the traditional mbox. Of course this won't work in an environment that requires local direct access to the

Re: [Imap-uw] Query for configuring NameSpace in UWIMAP server

2015-06-25 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Jamir Kadu wrote: Hello, I have installed UW IMAP server in our environment. Need some help on NameSpace on UWIMAP server. Below is my requirement. Could you guys help in the same. If possible can I get any documentation regarding the same as this is very urgent at our

Re: [Imap-uw] Panda and XLIST ... Anyone have a patch?

2014-05-07 Thread David B Funk
If the server supports RFC-6154 (IMAP LIST Extension for Special-Use Mailboxes http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6154) instead of the non-standard XLIST extension does that make Outlook 2013 happy? I'd far rather put effort into implementing something that is a publicly recognized standard which

Re: [Imap-uw] Impossible Empty Keyword

2014-01-27 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Mabry Tyson wrote: On Friday night, we upgraded our imapd server's hardware OS to Solaris 10 from Solaris 8. Both machines are running UW imap 2007f. We recompiled it on the new machine. As our users come back, we're seeing some log messages Jan 27 10:38:40 H

Re: [Imap-uw] Intermediate SSL certificates in UW-imapd

2013-09-26 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Andrew Daviel wrote: We have had UW imapd-2007e running fine for some time. Recently our SSL certificate provider announced that we had to upgrade our 1024-bit certificate to 2048 before it was revoked. The replacement they provided is not signed by a CA in the Mozilla

Re: [Imap-uw] Re: panda-imap VS uw-imap

2013-06-11 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, David B Funk wrote: Deniss, As far as I know, Jon's copy is a full version of Mark's panda-imap. I've never actually seen Mark's final work, but it looks like his style ;) and seems mostly complete, baring one specific omission. As far as its being a functional replacement

[Imap-uw] Re: panda-imap VS uw-imap

2013-06-10 Thread David B Funk
..] Today's Topics: 1. Re: [Imap-protocol] Re: UW-IMAPD and its interpretation of ESEARCH (David B Funk) [snip..] Deniss, As far as I know, Jon's copy is a full version of Mark's panda-imap. I've never actually seen Mark's final work, but it looks like his style ;) and seems mostly complete

[Imap-uw] Re: [Imap-protocol] Re: UW-IMAPD and its interpretation of ESEARCH

2013-06-09 Thread David B Funk
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Jan Kundrát wrote: On Saturday, 8 June 2013 08:10:48 CEST, Jonathan Abbey wrote: http://github.com/jonabey/panda-imap Assuming your github username is with double Bs, the offending code is likely found at

Re: [Imap-uw] imapd automove from spool to inbox

2010-12-03 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Andrew Daviel wrote: Pardon the weird title, but I have a weird situation. We use procmail for mail delivery via dmail, but historically did not trust users not to mangle procmailrc and lose their mail. So we have some templates, like all mail in INBOX, and file spam in

Re: [Imap-uw] Can mix format mailboxes be accessed as a local folder?

2010-10-14 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Tanya Brio wrote: Greetings, We have some mix format mailboxes that need to be available for reference purposes. They will no longer be used as mailboxes - they just have to be available as a local folder store. Is it possible to access mix mailboxes this way or can

Re: [Imap-uw] File system of choice?

2010-06-10 Thread David B Funk
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Andrew Daviel wrote: On Thu, 13 May 2010, Yiorgos Adamopoulos wrote: We manage ~100K mailboxes which will be migrated on new servers. The mailbox format is mbx (expetced to change to mix after the migration) and the Operating System will be Linux amd64. So, on what

Re: [Imap-uw] File system of choice?

2010-05-13 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 13 May 2010, Yiorgos Adamopoulos wrote: We manage ~100K mailboxes which will be migrated on new servers. The mailbox format is mbx (expetced to change to mix after the migration) and the Operating System will be Linux amd64. So, on what filesystem would one place them? Currently we

Re: [Imap-uw] Implementing mix on FreeBSD

2010-05-02 Thread David B Funk
On Sun, 2 May 2010, Mark Crispin wrote: The old UW IMAP FAQ hasn't been taken down yet. Read this topic: http://www.washington.edu/imap/IMAP-FAQs/index.html#4.5 Substitute mix for mbx and it's mostly still accurate. The step for sendmail is the very last step, and the answer is

Re: [Imap-uw] slow IMAP connection

2010-03-16 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Bob Atkins wrote: Yes, that is correct. The mix format consists of many files in a [snip..] status info which makes access /_very_/ fast. FYI, we implemented our mix solution using 10MB files rather than the default 1MB size because we felt that would be a more efficient

Re: [Imap-uw] expunge previously deleted email?

2009-02-18 Thread David B Funk
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Mark Crispin wrote: Basically, I did what you do by port redirection via code in imapd itself. Any client coming from a *.blackberry.com source gets a blackberry flag switched on internally in imapd which then activates the hack. I'm not sure if trying to enumerate all

[Imap-uw] Re: sporadic long delays accessing UW imap account via comcast

2009-01-08 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: Joel Reicher writes: My computer is connected, via a NAT address Is it possible your NAT box is losing state information for the IMAP connection? I have no idea why this would be happening, ... FWIW, one I occasionally use forgets about

RE: [Imap-uw] mix format doesn't check sysinbox for status

2008-09-19 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Mark Crispin wrote: Are you aware that sendmail also does case-independent matching of user ids? It is silly to assume that you want to have joey, Joey, JOEY, etc. as separate user ids. It's unfortunate that FTP makes that mistake. Actually sendmail does configurable

Re: [Imap-uw] so long, and thanks for all the fish!

2008-05-20 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 20 May 2008, Mark Crispin wrote: I was laid off today. Unfortunately, I didn't get a change to push imap-2007b out the door in release status, but the development tarball there is pretty close to my final bits. If you have support requests for UW imapd, please send them to the

[Imap-uw] Re: [Alpine-alpha] Feature request - HTML tables

2007-12-06 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Andrew Daviel wrote: I'd like to see better support for HTML tables. I have one correspondant who regularly sends event information (where/when/what) like this, and it's really hard to understand without saving and viewing in a browser (perhaps involving a file transfer

[Imap-uw] Re: [Alpine-alpha] Return-path of outbound mail from Web Alpine

2007-11-26 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Matthew Ford wrote: I installed Web Alpine on my Apache server, and everything seemed to be working fine... until I noticed something about the outbound mail it was sending. Since Web Alpine is a process running under the user-id of the webserver (daemon, www or

[Imap-uw] Re: [Alpine-alpha] Re: mix and alpine

2007-11-14 Thread David B Funk
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Eduardo Chappa wrote: On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Jussi Heino wrote: :) On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote: :) On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Damion Yates wrote: :) So, feature request: Could the auto-completion on Tab, when :) matching one of these new directories or

Re: [Imap-uw] Site about email servers

2007-11-07 Thread David B Funk
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: -- Mário Gamito [EMAIL PROTECTED] is rumored to have mumbled on 7. 2. Your info regarding IMAP is wrong. You write: The IMAP software we are going to install is Courier-imap from Washigton University. Courier is *not* from Washington

[Imap-uw] Re: [Imap-protocol] re: GMail

2007-10-29 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Mark Crispin wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Timo Sirainen wrote: I think quota is already pretty widely supported by clients, although in very limited form. If people have quota, they really want to know how much they have left (when they've reached the limit once..).

Re: [Imap-uw] Mix filesize

2007-09-14 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, nlin wrote: Hmm...I guess it depends on how you think of it. If I had 1GB inbox with 10MB dataroll, that's 100 files that get touched every day, with a 20MB data roll, that's 50 files. If I'm going to be making backups anyway on all these files, then I would rather

Re: [Imap-uw] NFSv4, anyone?

2006-11-06 Thread David B Funk
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, David Severance wrote: The NFS solution Centralized storage (a NetApp in our case) which is shared via NFS to a pool of IMAP servers behind a Foundry ServerIron doing a nice job of load balancing users. Clients connect and are sent to whichever IMAP server is least busy

Re: [Imap-uw] Converting a folder to a set of .eml files

2006-05-18 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 18 May 2006, Erik Kangas wrote: Hello, Goal: take an mbx folder and convert it to a set of files, one per message, in eml format (i.e. unix format with 1 message per file). I know this could be done several ways ... running IMAP and pulling down the messages and saving the source,

Re: [Imap-uw] imap and NFS

2005-11-29 Thread David B Funk
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Mark Crispin wrote: I doubt very much that NFS 4 fixes the problems, which are far deeper than locking issues. You also have to have synchronization of inode and data state across all clients, which requires a token-passing network filesystem. To my knowledge, TOPS-20

Re: POPBEFORESMTP question

2003-09-08 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Jennifer wrote: Dear IMAP people I have a POPBEFORESMTP question here, and wish to get your precious help and advice. We have a PC mail server, FreeBSD4.3, with IMAP200C installed as mail demaeon. Recently we are trying to put POPBEFORESMTP features on our little mail

Re: STORE atomicity

2003-07-16 Thread David B Funk
On 16 Jul 2003, Timo Sirainen wrote: On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 22:53, Mark Crispin wrote: It is a reason to say I don't want to have garbage-collection depend upon exclusive access. If so, then you need a more complex mechanism than is used in UW imapd's mbx driver. rename(). You rewrite

Re: imap tricks

2002-11-01 Thread David B Funk
On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Aaron Levitt wrote: Greets everyone- I am having some issues trying to apply the patches for imapd available from http://www.carumba.com/imap/. Most importantly, we need the ability change the definition of home directories and hide dot files. The site says it will

Re: Kerberos, safe solution?

2002-08-19 Thread David B Funk
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Andreas Aardal Hanssen wrote: On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Murat Bicer wrote: Passwords are not stored plaintext. The authentication is plaintext. Using Kerberos? You certainly need to store passwords in plaintext (or be able to retreive them in plaintext) to implement

re: IESG review of draft-crispin-imapv-16.txt

2002-05-29 Thread David B Funk
On Wed, 29 May 2002, Mark Crispin wrote: OK, this is helpful and may be the breakthrough that was needed. How about the following: [big snip...] This matches current reality. I don't see SRP discussed anywhere. I feel more comfortable with it than CRAM-MD5 because of the issue of storage