[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Brian Nitz wrote:
>> I think there are already better options than that.
>>- For example, you could try the CIFS (aka SMB) Client beta's
>> here: http://opensolaris.org/os/project/smbfs/
>
> Don't use the Beta - this is already in Nevada, build 84, now.
> The Beta w
t; "kinda there" means I can see it with nautilus, but not from the
>>>>> command line.
>>>>> It would be nice to be able to create say, a softlink to it (can
>>>>> I?), after the space has been mounted.
>>>>> That way I c
Brian Nitz wrote:
> I think there are already better options than that.
>
>- For example, you could try the CIFS (aka SMB) Client beta's here:
> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/smbfs/
Don't use the Beta - this is already in Nevada, build 84, now.
The Beta won't run on Solaris 10, so it's
;> "kinda there" means I can see it with nautilus, but not from the
>>>>> command line.
>>>>> It would be nice to be able to create say, a softlink to it (can
>>>>> I?), after the space has been mounted.
>>>>> That wa
oreing filesystems and use them as my own.
>>>> -Bryan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Robert Thurlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:49 PM
>>>> To: Bryan Boone
>>>
create say, a softlink to it (can
>>> I?), after the space has been mounted.
>>> That way I can mount foreing filesystems and use them as my own.
>>> -Bryan
>>>
>>> ____
>>> From: Robert Thurlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Sent: T
Nitz; indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] How good willIndiana be for
> desktop computing?
>
> Bryan Boone wrote:
>
>> My desktop computing requirements are a little more modest.
>> I develop Java apps for my company.
>>
wn.
-Bryan
From: Robert Thurlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 3:49 PM
To: Bryan Boone
Cc: Giacomo Tufano; Brian Nitz; indiana-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [indiana-discuss] How good will Indiana be for desktop
computing?
Bryan Boone wrote:
> My desk
Bryan Boone wrote:
> My desktop computing requirements are a little more modest.
> I develop Java apps for my company.
> So I need Java, nfs, and smb (cifs).
>
> Java, I think is there.
> NFS is there.
> SMB is kinda there, but I'd like to mount it via fstab (or the Solaris
> equivalent)
By "kin
My desktop computing requirements are a little more modest.
I develop Java apps for my company.
So I need Java, nfs, and smb (cifs).
Java, I think is there.
NFS is there.
SMB is kinda there, but I'd like to mount it via fstab (or the Solaris
equivalent)
The thing I love most about developing in
Youri Podchosov wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 20:29 -0500, Youri Podchosov wrote:
>>> Mark Phalan wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 07:24 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
>>> How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv
>> etc) going to be in project >Indiana? I ask this
>> because it suc
Brett wrote:
> -bash-3.2# pkg info -s | grep -i glib
> SUNWGlibGLIB - Library of useful routines for C programming
> -bash-3.2# pkg info SUNWGlib
> Name: SUNWGlib
> FMRI: pkg://opensolaris.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T151838Z
> Version: 1.2.10
That
> If anyone is compiling/has compiled these components
> for indiana preview2 could you please post detailed
> steps/prereq's. I attempted it but only got as far as
Hi!
I have compiled the ffmpeg plugin for gstreamer in Solaris Express Developer
1/08 which have all dependency libraries and gcc /
Thanks for that Alan I had already tried SUNWxorg-headers (should have
mentioned that in the last post), but it did no good. installing
FSWxorg-headers did the trick. Now I have mpeg2dec-0.4.1 installed clean.
Unfortunately the other components seem to need a newer version of Glib and
Gstr
Bart Smaalders wrote:
> Brett wrote:
>> Are the xorg header packages available elsewhere? Or is this going to result
>> with me back in compile hell again?
>>
>
> > pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T171913Z
>
> looks like an xorg header pkg to me
That's only part of the headers - m
Brett wrote:
> looks like those dont exist just yet on pkg.opensolaris.org. the only
> SUNWxorg packages i can see are :-
>
> pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T171744Z
> pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T171754Z
> pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T171806Z
> pkg:/[EMAIL PRO
looks like those dont exist just yet on pkg.opensolaris.org. the only SUNWxorg
packages i can see are :-
pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T171744Z
pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T171754Z
pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T171806Z
pkg:/[EMAIL PROTECTED],5.11-0.79:20080205T
Il Friday 22 February 2008 00:39:31 Brett ha scritto:
> if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -I../include
> -Wall -g -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-common -mcpu=i386 -I/usr/X11/include
> -I/usr/include/SDL -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 -D_REENTRANT -MT video_out_x11.o -MD -MP
> -MF ".d
If anyone is compiling/has compiled these components for indiana preview2 could
you please post detailed steps/prereq's. I attempted it but only got as far as
:-
-bash-3.2# cd $home
-bash-3.2# cd gst-ffmpeg-0.10.3
-bash-3.2# ./configure
...
...
checking for valgrind... no
configure: Looking f
Il giorno 21/feb/08, alle ore 18:35, Brian Nitz ha scritto:
> Giacomo Tufano wrote:
>> Il giorno 21/feb/08, alle ore 17:22, Brian Nitz ha scritto:
>>> Rather than focusing on how difficult it is to run dodgey,
>>> unlicensed
>>> video codecs out of the box as compared to Ubuntu, I'd like to make
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Giacomo Tufano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Il giorno 21/feb/08, alle ore 17:22, Brian Nitz ha scritto:
>
>
> > Rather than focusing on how difficult it is to run dodgey, unlicensed
> > video codecs out of the box as compared to Ubuntu, I'd like to make
> > sure
Giacomo Tufano wrote:
> Il giorno 21/feb/08, alle ore 17:22, Brian Nitz ha scritto:
>
>
>> Rather than focusing on how difficult it is to run dodgey, unlicensed
>> video codecs out of the box as compared to Ubuntu, I'd like to make
>> sure
>> that our licensed Fluendo g-streamer plugins, LinDV
Il giorno 21/feb/08, alle ore 17:22, Brian Nitz ha scritto:
> Rather than focusing on how difficult it is to run dodgey, unlicensed
> video codecs out of the box as compared to Ubuntu, I'd like to make
> sure
> that our licensed Fluendo g-streamer plugins, LinDVD legal DVD playing
> and free mul
I understand there are some real differences in the "out of the box"
experience between Ubuntu and Indiana Preview 2, but can we level the
playing field a tiny bit by discussing multimedia support that is legal
enough to be widely deployed even in countries with strict IP laws?
AFAIK even on U
>
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 20:29 -0500, Youri Podchosov wrote:
>> Mark Phalan wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 07:24 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
>> How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv
>> >>> etc) going to be in project >Indiana? I ask this
>> >>> because it sucks in Solaris 10 and e
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 15:24 +0100, Nico Sabbi wrote:
> On Thursday 21 February 2008 15:05:57 Mark Phalan wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 20:29 -0500, Youri Podchosov wrote:
>
> > >
> > > "The playback of this movie requires a MPEG-1/2 System Stream
> > > demuxer plugin which is not installed."
>
On Thursday 21 February 2008 15:24:56 Nico Sabbi wrote:
> do you mean that gstreamer can use libavcodec (encoders and
> decoders) but not libavformat (muxers and demuxers) ? It looks
> strange to me ___
gstreamer can definitely use libavformat, as this f
On Thursday 21 February 2008 15:05:57 Mark Phalan wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 20:29 -0500, Youri Podchosov wrote:
> >
> > "The playback of this movie requires a MPEG-1/2 System Stream
> > demuxer plugin which is not installed."
> >
> > What's the catch? What does totem want?
>
> Hmm.. well it
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 20:29 -0500, Youri Podchosov wrote:
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 07:24 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
> How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv
> >>> etc) going to be in project >Indiana? I ask this
> >>> because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevad
Mark Phalan wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 07:24 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv
>>> etc) going to be in project >Indiana? I ask this
>>> because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada /
OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
>>> Euan,
>
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:17 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:25 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >> > Mark Phalan wrote:
> >> >> If you're still looking for a good solution for multi-media on
> >> >> OpenSolaris I've found that the the easiest path is to simply compile
> >
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:25 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> > Mark Phalan wrote:
>> >> If you're still looking for a good solution for multi-media on
>> >> OpenSolaris I've found that the the easiest path is to simply compile
>> >> the ffmpeg plugin for gstreamer:
>> >>
>> >> Get it here:
>> >>
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 11:25 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > Mark Phalan wrote:
> >> If you're still looking for a good solution for multi-media on
> >> OpenSolaris I've found that the the easiest path is to simply compile
> >> the ffmpeg plugin for gstreamer:
> >>
> >> Get it here:
> >> http://gst
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 16:18 +, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
> Mark Phalan wrote:
> > If you're still looking for a good solution for multi-media on
> > OpenSolaris I've found that the the easiest path is to simply compile
> > the ffmpeg plugin for gstreamer:
> >
> > Get it here:
> > http://gstreamer
> Mark Phalan wrote:
>> If you're still looking for a good solution for multi-media on
>> OpenSolaris I've found that the the easiest path is to simply compile
>> the ffmpeg plugin for gstreamer:
>>
>> Get it here:
>> http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/src/gst-ffmpeg/gst-ffmpeg-0.10.3.tar.bz2
>>
>>
Mark Phalan wrote:
> If you're still looking for a good solution for multi-media on
> OpenSolaris I've found that the the easiest path is to simply compile
> the ffmpeg plugin for gstreamer:
>
> Get it here:
> http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/src/gst-ffmpeg/gst-ffmpeg-0.10.3.tar.bz2
>
> It compile
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 07:24 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
> > >How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv
> > etc) going to be in project >Indiana? I ask this
> > because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada /
> > >OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
> >
> > Euan,
> > Multimedia o
> >How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv
> etc) going to be in project >Indiana? I ask this
> because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada /
> >OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
>
> Euan,
> Multimedia on Solaris is well supported as it was
> about 3-4 years ago. Not as
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 15:06:42 Ken Mays wrote:
> >How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv etc) going to be
> > in project >Indiana? I ask this because it sucks in Solaris 10
> > and even Nevada / >OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to
> > date.
>
> Euan,
> Multimedia on Solaris
>How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv etc) going to be in project
>>Indiana? I ask this because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada /
>>OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
Euan,
Multimedia on Solaris is well supported as it was about 3-4 years ago. Not as
up-to-date
Hi Euan,
You can get a DRI driver for ATI here
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri/files/
Cheers,
Peter
On Feb 19, 2008, at 3:38, Euan Thoms wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback. Somebody else mentioned gluten-print but I
> think it's inbuilt into Nevada? I tried Nevada build 78 and had no
Euan Thoms wrote:
> Thanks for your feedback. Somebody else mentioned gluten-print but I think
> it's inbuilt into Nevada? I tried Nevada build 78 and had no luck with my
> PIXMA iP2200, canon seems to have low support in solaris and linux. I will
> give this gimp print a go but I am skeptical.
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 12:38 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
> I will give this gimp print a go but I am skeptical.
Unfortunately we've come to the same conclusion - Canon support for open
systems is somewhat lacking. Epson and HP are much better supported.
> Apologies for accusing solaris of not supp
Thanks for your feedback. Somebody else mentioned gluten-print but I think it's
inbuilt into Nevada? I tried Nevada build 78 and had no luck with my PIXMA
iP2200, canon seems to have low support in solaris and linux. I will give this
gimp print a go but I am skeptical.
Apologies for accusing so
On Feb 18, 2008 11:38 AM, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Bob Netherton wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 08:32 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
> >> I ask this because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada /
> >> OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
>
Euan Thoms wrote:
> How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv etc) going to be in
> project Indiana? I ask this because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even
> Nevada / OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
>
Its going to suck for awhile as adoption is still low and Solaris 10 is
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 09:38 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
> Have you used a recent Ubuntu?
Yes I have. And to make my point I use the Ubuntu GNOME
themes on my Indiana and Nevada desktop - and when someone
asks, a uname -a shows that Solaris can look the same.
> A lot of this stuff Just Works out of
> How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv etc)
> going to be in project Indiana? I ask this because it
> sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada / OpenSolaris
> builds that i have trialled to date.
Since Indiana is freely redistributable, there won't be AFAIK
any support for those formats yo
On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:51 AM, Bob Netherton wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 08:32 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
>> I ask this because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada /
>> OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
>
> This is simply not true. OK, perhaps if you are looking for
> ever
Euan Thoms wrote:
> Last but not least, will 3D graphics support be available for Solaris in the
> future, is it on the agenda or will it remain to be deamed unnecessary?
Solaris has had 3D graphics support for about 15 years now, and
doesn't plan to drop it. It was unfortunately SPARC-only for
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 08:32 -0800, Euan Thoms wrote:
> I ask this because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada / OpenSolaris
> builds that i have trialled to date.
This is simply not true. OK, perhaps if you are looking for everything
to be nicely integrated at install time and supported by t
Euan Thoms wrote:
> How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv etc) going to be in project
> Indiana? I ask this because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada /
> OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
>
> I am a big fan of Sun products and for the last 6 months I've been doing m
How well supported is multimedia (mpeg, avi, wmv etc) going to be in project
Indiana? I ask this because it sucks in Solaris 10 and even Nevada /
OpenSolaris builds that i have trialled to date.
I am a big fan of Sun products and for the last 6 months I've been doing my
best to move away from W
53 matches
Mail list logo
