Restoring backup

2001-11-19 Thread Francesc Guasch Ortiz
I have a solaris 2.6 box with cyrus-imapd 1.5.19. Someone removed all the files of an imap folder. The folder has subfolders that are still there and available. I restored the backup but now the messages can't be retrieved. Netscape communicator tells me there are some messages there but when I

RE: Restoring backup

2001-11-19 Thread Gareth Blades
Have you checked to make sure the file permissions were restored correctly? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Francesc Guasch Ortiz Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 08:39 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Restoring backup I have a solaris 2.6

Re: Restoring backup

2001-11-19 Thread Francesc Guasch Ortiz
Gareth Blades escribió: Thank you very much for answering Gareht. Have you checked to make sure the file permissions were restored correctly? Yes, that was the very first I did after restoring. It was okay. I tested delivering to the mailbox and it worked. But I can't read any message. Even

Re: Restoring backup

2001-11-19 Thread Emiliano
Francesc Guasch Ortiz wrote: Have you checked to make sure the file permissions were restored correctly? Yes, that was the very first I did after restoring. It was okay. I tested delivering to the mailbox and it worked. But I can't read any message. Even the ones delivered after the

Re: Restoring backup

2001-11-19 Thread John Wade
If it is an ACL problem, ACL's are stored in the mailboxes file.Take a look at the lines for the user's mailboxes, they should look somehing like this: user.jdoe 1 jdoe lrswipcda user.jdoe.Trash 1 jdoelrswipcda The first entry is the mailbox name, the second

Re: Which Berkeley DB Product does cyrus use?

2001-11-19 Thread Birger Toedtmann
Esh, Thomas D (Tom) schrieb am Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 10:26:22AM -0500: * * We are evaluating the possibility of using cyrus for a * commercial product. * * Therefore, I'm looking licensing issues with Cyrus and the Berkeley DB * product must be licensed if the source code of the product * using

[POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Cyrus users, We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it dependent on SASL v2. We would like to do this for a number of reasons: 1. Take advantage of the benefits of SASL v2 (improvements in memory

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Simon Josefsson
Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The biggest (only?) downside for existing installations is that any secrets stored in sasldb would have to migrated to the new format. This will require resetting all of the users passwords because they can not be extracted from the old sasldb (unless

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:54:11 -0500 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ken We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said ken this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it ken dependent on SASL v2. We would like to do this for a number of

graphing snmp information

2001-11-19 Thread Darin Perusich
i'm looking to gather more information about implementing the cyrus-graphtools for my site, management likes to see pretty graphs. i'm running ucd-snmp-4.2 which i compiled from source distributed with redhat 7.1, i configued with the --with-mib-modules=agentx after reading a post to the list.

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Emiliano
Ken Murchison wrote: The biggest (only?) downside for existing installations is that any secrets stored in sasldb would have to migrated to the new format. This will require resetting all of the users passwords because they can not be extracted from the old sasldb (unless you have been

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Emiliano
Ken Murchison wrote: The biggest (only?) downside for existing installations is that any secrets stored in sasldb would have to migrated to the new format. This will require resetting all of the users passwords because they can not be extracted from the old sasldb (unless you have been

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, On Mon, 19 Nov 2001 13:54:11 -0500 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ken We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said ken this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it ken dependent on SASL v2. We would

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Simon Loader
Ken Murchison wrote: Cyrus users, We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it dependent on SASL v2. We would like to do this for a number of reasons: 1. Take advantage of the benefits of SASL

RE: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread OCNS Consulting
Ken, I have no problem resetting SASL Admin passwords however, does this change to SASL V2 effect PAM authentication (kerberos, LDAP, etc.)? Regards, Robert Beazley OCNS, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Ken Murchison
OCNS Consulting wrote: Ken, I have no problem resetting SASL Admin passwords however, does this change to SASL V2 effect PAM authentication (kerberos, LDAP, etc.)? All of the plaintext verification mechanisms (PAM, password, shadow, krb, sasldb, etc) have been moved out of the library

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Pat Lashley
--On Monday, November 19, 2001 01:54:11 PM -0500 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cyrus users, We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it dependent on SASL v2. We would like to do this for

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Christopher Wong
On Monday 19 November 2001 01:54 pm, Ken Murchison wrote: Cyrus users, We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it dependent on SASL v2. We would like to do this for a number of reasons: 1. Take

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Pat Lashley wrote: --On Monday, November 19, 2001 01:54:11 PM -0500 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cyrus users, We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it dependent on SASL v2.

Re: imapmigrate and wrong 'received' dates in outlook

2001-11-19 Thread Jules Agee
Sorry I was out of the loop for this thread, I'm a little behind on my mail. I'm currently testing a new version of imapmigrate -- I'll add this patch and it will be included in the next release. Thanks, Scot! Scot W. Hetzel wrote: From: Darrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] We're testing the

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Christopher Wong wrote: On Monday 19 November 2001 01:54 pm, Ken Murchison wrote: Cyrus users, We are getting close to releasing Cyrus v2.1 (yeah, I know I've said this a bunch of times already) and we are leaning towards making it dependent on SASL v2. We would like to do this

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Ken Murchison wrote: The biggest (only?) downside for existing installations is that any secrets stored in sasldb would have to migrated to the new format. This will require resetting all of the users passwords because they can not be extracted from the old sasldb

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Christopher Wong wrote: 1. Take advantage of the benefits of SASL v2 (improvements in memory management, support for additional plugin types, simplified database support, and improved error reporting). [snip] You have sketched out benefits largely from a developer's

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Pat Lashley
--On Monday, November 19, 2001 03:49:59 PM -0500 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The biggest (only?) downside for existing installations is that any secrets stored in sasldb would have to migrated to the new format. This will require resetting all of the users passwords because

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Jev
I would be all for making cyrus-imapd SASLv2 dependant. Best Regards, -Jev On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 01:54:11PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: Cyrus users,

Re: graphing snmp information

2001-11-19 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Can you use snmpwalk to see your statistics? Something like snmpwalk mail3.andrew.cmu.edu public cmu you should see a large number of entries under enterprises.cmuMIB. If you can't see that, step #1 is to understand what's happening. You might want to crack up the logging on snmpd and see

Re: Which Berkeley DB Product does cyrus use?

2001-11-19 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
From: Esh, Thomas D (Tom) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 10:26:22 -0500 We are evaluating the possibility of using cyrus for a commercial product. Therefore, I'm looking licensing issues with Cyrus and the Berkeley DB product must be licensed if the source code of

Re: graphing snmp information

2001-11-19 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: snmpwalk mail3.andrew.cmu.edu public cmu you should see a large number of entries under enterprises.cmuMIB. Where can one get the CMU and cmuCyrus MIB files? I had to nuke away the cmuMIB and cmuCyrus mib symbols, converting them to their OIDs to

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Pat Lashley wrote: --On Monday, November 19, 2001 03:49:59 PM -0500 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The biggest (only?) downside for existing installations is that any secrets stored in sasldb would have to migrated to the new format. This will require resetting all of the

Re: graphing snmp information

2001-11-19 Thread Lawrence Greenfield
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 22:20:49 -0200 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Lawrence Greenfield wrote: snmpwalk mail3.andrew.cmu.edu public cmu you should see a large number of entries under enterprises.cmuMIB. Where can one get the CMU and

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Pat Lashley
--On Monday, November 19, 2001 07:40:16 PM -0500 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right. Which means that they will be duplicated and must be kept in sync for as long as you have apps using both versions. Changing your password in either database won't automatically change it in the

SASL Authentication Problems with sendmail

2001-11-19 Thread Brett Lomas
Hi, I am having a couple of problems with SASL authentication. First of all, the authentication mechanisms CRAM-MD5 DIGECT-MD5 done't appear as being supported, even though I have used the the sample programs that come with SASL those appear to work. Also, I have set the pwcheck_method to

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Ken Murchison wrote: The v1 sasl library supported an auto-transition for plaintext logins where the login was authenticated against some external mechanism (e.g., /etc/passwd) and then used to create the entries in the sasldb. A similar auto-transition, even

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Ken Murchison
Rob Siemborski wrote: As far as setpass() specifically, each plugin is still allowed to maintain its own database of secrets if necessary. There is no requirement that any mechanism plugin use sasldb for authentication (e.g. KERBEROS_V4). For the record, saslpasswd makes all appropriate

Second vacation patch for cyrus-imapd-2.0.16

2001-11-19 Thread Gary Mills
The previous patch that I submitted made sure that the envelope recipient address of the message that triggers a vacation response had the same domain name as the one used by the MTA. Today's patch ensures that this same address will be used as the originator of the response message. Taking it

Serious problems - Please help

2001-11-19 Thread Eranga Udesh
Hi All, I have a mail server setup with Cyrus Imap 2.0.16 and Postfix snapshot-20010808 with LDAP and I use a php based webmail system. Everything works fine, but occasionally I experience 2 serious problem. 1: Webmail login for certain accounts get blocked. Once this happened I can use

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Todd Nemanich
Hello all, All the talk about the sasldb migration reminds me of Nalin Dahyabhai's pam sasldb patch (http://people.redhat.com/nalin/test/pam_sasldb-20011022.tgz). Has anyone tried that yet? My thought is this. Perhaps people who need to migrate could use that (probably with a little

Re: [POLL] Cyrus v2.1 and SASL v2

2001-11-19 Thread Jeremy Howard
Additionally, how hard is it to write a pwcheck method in SASL 2? I had a couple I did in SASL 1.5, but they required patches to the source. Can you just drop in a plugin, do you have to write a pwcheck/saslauthd daemon, or is there a simpler method I'm just overlooking? You can plug in a