Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-30 Thread Joe Rhett
> There might be a little bit of pain involved for large sites to migrate > to IMAP 2.1/SASL 2.x, but there aren't any showstoppers that I'm aware > of. > > If CMU can do it (and yes, they are using Sendmail 8.12.x with SMTP > AUTH), then any site should be able to do it. I have asked several t

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-30 Thread Joe Rhett
> I'll take a shot at it (it being an interim tool). Is this basically > what people are looking for? > > a saslpasswd that does it's operations on both /etc/sasldb (old sasl) > and /etc/sasldb2 (new sasl) Yeppers. > a sasldblistusers that will list from either Not so important for us, an

RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Enric Ramos
enero de 2002 21:45 > Para: Joe Rhett > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Murchison > Asunto: Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 > > > Joe Rhett wrote: > > Maybe, but in forcing the new SASL you've raised the entry > bar too high > for > > any production configuratio

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Ken Murchison
Jeremy Howard wrote: > > Ken Murchison wrote: > > There might be a little bit of pain involved for large sites to migrate > > to IMAP 2.1/SASL 2.x, but there aren't any showstoppers that I'm aware > > of. > > > > If CMU can do it (and yes, they are using Sendmail 8.12.x with SMTP > > AUTH), the

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Rob Siemborski
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Eric Estabrooks wrote: > a saslconv to convert from one to the other <- this would be a no go if > the data encryption changed (not just stored different) This exists.. it's the dbconverter-2 utility that is included in the SASLv2 distribution. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Eric Estabrooks
I'll take a shot at it (it being an interim tool). Is this basically what people are looking for? a saslpasswd that does it's operations on both /etc/sasldb (old sasl) and /etc/sasldb2 (new sasl) a sasldblistusers that will list from either a saslconv to convert from one to the other <- this

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Jeremy Howard
Ken Murchison wrote: > There might be a little bit of pain involved for large sites to migrate > to IMAP 2.1/SASL 2.x, but there aren't any showstoppers that I'm aware > of. > > If CMU can do it (and yes, they are using Sendmail 8.12.x with SMTP > AUTH), then any site should be able to do it. > Co

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Jeremy Howard
Joe Rhett wrote: > Maybe, but in forcing the new SASL you've raised the entry bar too high for > any production configuration to join. Your baby might be born, but she's > on the moon and we have no spaceships to get there yet. > Ken's scratched his itch. He wanted hier-sep so he wrote it, and he

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Ken Murchison
Jeremy Howard wrote: > > Joe Rhett wrote: > > Maybe, but in forcing the new SASL you've raised the entry bar too high > for > > any production configuration to join. Your baby might be born, but she's > > on the moon and we have no spaceships to get there yet. > > > Ken's scratched his itch. H

RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread simon
On Tue, 2002-01-29 at 15:08, Ramiro Morales wrote: > Enric, > > Are you sure? > > I see the imap/namespace.h file at line 10858 in Simon's patch I screwed up he was right , I just put a new vversion up I didnt realised he had my patch to start iwth. but ive fixed it all now (should have C

RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Ramiro Morales
9:28, Enric Ramos wrote about "RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16": Subject: RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 Date sent: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 09:28:45 +0100 From: "Enric Ramos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "simon&quo

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Joe Rhett
> There is no further development on any branches other than HEAD at this > time (um, well, Rob is working on some sieve byte-code stuff but this is > limited to a small set of files, even though he's working on a branch). > > Unfortunately, I don't have the time, inclination or desire to port th

RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-29 Thread Enric Ramos
- Enric Ramos Network & System Specialyst Atlas Internet Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Mensaje original- > De: simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: lunes, 28 de enero de 2002 23:28 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: d

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-28 Thread simon
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 21:38, Ken Murchison wrote: > > > Joe Rhett wrote: > > > > Any chance one of you could do this so that the branch is validated and up > > to date, please? Briref note I have a patch for this (taken from the cvs ) at:- http://www.surf.org.uk/downloads/HIERSEP-r2.patch

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-28 Thread Ken Murchison
oesn't exists... > > > > > > Thsnks ! > > > > > > Enric > > > > > > > -Mensaje original- > > > > De: Jeremy Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Enviado el: sábado, 26 de enero de 2002 8:22 > >

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-28 Thread Joe Rhett
re could I find this file (namespace.h) ?? > > > > I have search in 2.0.16,2.1.1,2.0.15... but this file doesn't exists... > > > > Thsnks ! > > > > Enric > > > > > -Mensaje original----- > > > De: Jeremy Howard [mailto:[E

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-28 Thread Ken Murchison
el: sábado, 26 de enero de 2002 8:22 > > Para: Joe Rhett > > CC: Enric Ramos; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Asunto: Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 > > > > > > > > > We are locking for "dothack" patch in order to be able to create > > logins > >

RE: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-28 Thread Enric Ramos
nero de 2002 8:22 > Para: Joe Rhett > CC: Enric Ramos; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16 > > > > > > We are locking for "dothack" patch in order to be able to create > logins > > > > with dots... > > > > >

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-25 Thread Joe Rhett
> > We are locking for "dothack" patch in order to be able to create logins > > with dots... > > > The alternate separator patch is incorporated into 2.1, which provides the > same functionality. Yes, yes, but 2.1 requires the new SASL and all those problems. Since the 'final answer' is "stick w

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-25 Thread Jeremy Howard
> > > We are locking for "dothack" patch in order to be able to create logins > > > with dots... > > > > > The alternate separator patch is incorporated into 2.1, which provides the > > same functionality. > > Yes, yes, but 2.1 requires the new SASL and all those problems. Since the > 'final answ

Re: dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-25 Thread Jeremy Howard
> We are locking for "dothack" patch in order to be able to create logins > with dots... > The alternate separator patch is incorporated into 2.1, which provides the same functionality.

dothack and cyrus 2.0.16

2002-01-24 Thread Enric Ramos
Hi: We are locking for "dothack" patch in order to be able to create logins with dots... i.e. enric.ramos.atlassolutions.net so in cyradm ... we should do "cm user_enric.ramos.atlassolutions.net" or something like this... I know that in cyrus-imapd-2.0.12 this patch exists... I have applied th