On 14 April 2023 05:35:39 BST, "Michał Marcin Brzuchalski"
wrote:
>Have you thought about not populating property by default but instead:
>* adding "use" language construct as default to all methods?
>* adding ability to assign variable values from "use" to property if needed?
>
>Like desugar to
Em qui., 13 de abr. de 2023 às 09:40, Nicolas Grekas <
nicolas.grekas+...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
> I created this draft RFC to help move things forward:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/syntax-to-capture-variables-when-declaring-anonymous-classes
>
> Please let me know your early thoughts and I'd be h
Hi Nicolas,
czw., 13 kwi 2023 o 14:40 Nicolas Grekas
napisał(a):
> Hi Rowan, hi all!
>
> Le ven. 17 mars 2023 à 15:51, Larry Garfield a
> écrit :
>
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, at 6:05 PM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> > > On 16/03/2023 22:14, Larry Garfield wrote:
> > >> Wouldn't the functionality descr
The PHP development team announces the immediate availability of PHP
8.1.18. This is a bugfix release.
All PHP 8.1 users are encouraged to upgrade to this version.
For source downloads of PHP 8.1.18 please visit our downloads page.
Windows binaries can be found on the PHP for Windows site.
The l
With regards to user interfaces for email itself, I'd like to mention that
there are many hybrids out there that work for many communities. I'm not
proposing this in any way. I'm quite happy for PHP to use mailing lists, and
personally would recommend improving the existing web interface, and to
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023, at 3:04 PM, Zoltán Fekete wrote:
> Hey guys!
>
>> On 13. Apr 2023, at 16:28, Robert Landers wrote:
>>
>> I'd be down for implementing this in a heartbeat if we
>>
>> $a = Closure::fromCallable(static fn () => $this->getId());
>> $b = Closure::bindMany($items); // executes `
The PHP development team announces the immediate availability of PHP
8.2.5. This is a bugfix release.
All PHP 8.2 users are encouraged to upgrade to this version.
For source downloads of PHP 8.2.5 please visit our downloads page.
Windows binaries can be found on the PHP for Windows site.
The list
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 13:40, Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
>
> I created this draft RFC to help move things forward:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/syntax-to-capture-variables-when-declaring-anonymous-classes
>
> Please let me know your early thoughts and I'd be happy to move it to
> "under discussion".
>
> I cannot really assess how big of a hassle it would be, but what I personally
> think that it look nice is something like this:
>
> ```
> class Verification
> {
> public function __construct(private string $id) {}
>
> public function getId(): string
> {
> return $this->id;
> }
>
Hey guys!
> On 13. Apr 2023, at 16:28, Robert Landers wrote:
>
> I'd be down for implementing this in a heartbeat if we
>
> $a = Closure::fromCallable(static fn () => $this->getId());
> $b = Closure::bindMany($items); // executes `bind` on each item in the
> array, returning an array of closure
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 3:47 PM Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> I can't see a technical reason not to do it like this, but some people
> seem to be having negative gut reactions to it, and it's hard to
> persuade someone about aesthetics.
>
> Notes here: https://phpopendocs.com/rfc_codex/class_method_callabl
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 at 07:30, Robert Landers wrote:
>
> This has been brought up a couple of times, but I can't seem to find
> it.
https://externals.io/message/119392
https://externals.io/message/120011
> I don't think something like this is possible with the current
> implementation of first-cl
Hi Rowan, hi all!
Le ven. 17 mars 2023 à 15:51, Larry Garfield a
écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023, at 6:05 PM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
> > On 16/03/2023 22:14, Larry Garfield wrote:
> >> Wouldn't the functionality described boil down to essentially just
> materializing into a few extra lines in the c
On 2023-04-12 22:26, Rowan Tommins wrote:
I could just about live with that example changing so that the
fallback was cached, but I definitely don't think an explicit call
like \foo\strlen('x') should become an implicit alias for
\strlen('x'), which is apparently the current proposal.
I reall
On 13.04.23 10:50, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:46, Andreas Heigl wrote:
DMARC is less of a concern, because the list apparently already performs
DMARC mangling for a policy that is not 'none'
Apart from (possibly) modifying the body and the subject line which then
breaks the DKIM
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:46, Andreas Heigl wrote:
DMARC is less of a concern, because the list apparently already performs
DMARC mangling for a policy that is not 'none'
Apart from (possibly) modifying the body and the subject line which then
breaks the DKIM signature which then breaks DMARC ;-)
I
Hey
On 13.04.23 10:38, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:29, Andreas Heigl wrote:
1. Remove modification of the emails on the lists server so that DKIM
and DMARC will finally work
Yes, please, but for different reasons:
Filtering is much more reliably performed using the 'list-id' heade
> On 13 Apr 2023, at 09:29, Andreas Heigl wrote:
>
> Hey all
>
> On 12.04.23 22:44, Larry Garfield wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 6:42 PM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
>>> Which brings me back to my earlier point: I wonder how much of the
>>> reaction is really about e-mail itself, and how much i
Hello good people,
Looks like another hot discussion on the list, isn't it?
Just wanted to share my notice about the initial idea.
7 years ago there were people considering NNTP as an option. Nowadays,
it's pretty clear that it isn't the way to go. It doesn't mean that
technology is bad (althoug
Hi
On 4/13/23 10:29, Andreas Heigl wrote:
1. Remove modification of the emails on the lists server so that DKIM
and DMARC will finally work
Yes, please, but for different reasons:
Filtering is much more reliably performed using the 'list-id' header
compared to a Subject prefix and not having
Hey all
On 12.04.23 22:44, Larry Garfield wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 6:42 PM, Rowan Tommins wrote:
Which brings me back to my earlier point: I wonder how much of the
reaction is really about e-mail itself, and how much is just the
documentation and sign-up forms you encounter *before* yo
On 12 April 2023 23:50:25 BST, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 17:32, Claude Pache wrote:
>>
>> The proposed modification of `function_exists()` will break existing code:
>
>Please can you submit a failing test to
>https://github.com/Girgias/php-src/tree/zend_autoloader that shows a
>B
On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 8:53 AM Herbert Groot Jebbink
wrote:
>
> Op wo 12 apr. 2023 16:04 schreef Rowan Tommins :
>
> > On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 13:25, Herbert Groot Jebbink <
> > herb...@groot.jebbink.nl> wrote:
> >
> >> fallback for REQUEST_TIME and REQUEST_TIME_FLOAT to hrtime seems not
> >> poss
On 12 April 2023 23:50:25 BST, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 at 17:32, Claude Pache wrote:
>>
>> The proposed modification of `function_exists()` will break existing code:
>
>Please can you submit a failing test to
>https://github.com/Girgias/php-src/tree/zend_autoloader that shows a
>B
24 matches
Mail list logo
