I'd like to thank everyone for voting on the topic and making their
opinions known. The conclusion is that:
E_STRICT will not be a part of E_ALL, however E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR
will be, this means no new errors will appear for current user, as
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is similar to what E_ERROR
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So the only affect is that value numeric value of E_ALL is greater then
it was before. Marcus has already applied patch to this affect a few
days ago (Thanks!).
This needs to be made obvious in the release notes or something. Users
that set their error level in
I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So the only affect is that value numeric value of E_ALL is greater
then it was before. Marcus has already applied patch to this
affect a few days ago (Thanks!).
This
Back to my original (off-list) question - what happens if people don't have
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR level error reporting switched on? Does it fall back to
E_ERROR or does the code fail silently?
I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
When E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is triggers and not handled, it gets
translated to an E_ERROR Catchable fatal error
On 19-May-06, at 12:10 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Back to my original (off-list) question - what happens if people
don't have E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR level error reporting switched on?
Cool. I just had a horrible vision of hundreds of reports of 'strange
crashes' :)
When E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR is triggers and not handled, it gets translated
to an E_ERROR Catchable fatal error
On 19-May-06, at 12:10 PM, Steph Fox wrote:
Back to my original (off-list) question - what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there an UPGRADING 5.1 to 5.2? I think there it would make sense, too.
- - Markus
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
I'll add a note about it to the 5.2 README file.
On 19-May-06, at 11:00 AM, Brian Moon wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So the only
Hello Markus,
the question alone makes me question if it was worth the effort starting
it :-)
best regards
marcus
Friday, May 19, 2006, 11:23:32 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there an UPGRADING 5.1 to 5.2? I think there it would make sense, too.
- -
On Tue, May 16, 2006 6:26 pm, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-0.5
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar =
1;
+1
--
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Tue, May 16, 2006 6:26 pm, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I'd say E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR has to go into E_ALL as it was effectively
there previously, as part of E_ERROR. So +1 there.
As far as
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {}
foo::$bar = 1;
On Wed, May 17, 2006 2:03 pm, Marcus Boerger wrote:
there is a technical issue besides slowdown. We have to work around
the
fact that suddenly a function might get $this as a normal variable
Hello Richard,
well my mail was a bit out of context or at the wrong reply to Sebastian.
He was talking about issues with callin static functions with bypassing
$this as a parameter
best regards
marcus
Friday, May 19, 2006, 12:22:36 AM, you wrote:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Addition of
At 12:23 17/05/2006, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 02:26 17/05/2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I don't like E_ALL ~E_NOTICE suddenly starting to
On 17.05.2006 03:26, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
E_RECOVERABLE should stay.
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+0
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 02:26, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
Addition of
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
Apparently I had the wrong context when I read a posting by Marcus on
technical issues (slowdown).
If there are no technical issues with implementing this, then I am -0
on this.
--
Am Mi, den 17.05.2006 schrieb Ilia Alshanetsky um 1:26:
-1 for E_STRICT in 5.x
/Georg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 02:26 17/05/2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Changing the behavior of error reporting can have some implications on
servers where it is intended to not show errors at least with E_STRICT
errors.
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {}
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
--
Etienne Kneuss
http://www.colder.ch/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe,
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I am not glad with E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR at all, but if it went into 5.2 it
should be included into E_ALL, becouse in most cases it substitute E_ERROR
messages.
E_STRICT +0
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR +1
Addition of support for dynamic statics
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR's apparently going in anyway.
E_STRICT, I'd be all for including into E_ALL now if it weren't for the
'semi-statics' issue (complex) and the
On 17-May-06, at 2:10 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
I
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and
forth flaming going around and we need to finally come to a
decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {}
foo::$bar
At 04:26 PM 5/16/2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
Addition of support for dynamic
Hello Sebastian,
there is a technical issue besides slowdown. We have to work around the
fact that suddenly a function might get $this as a normal variable (remember
the examples give on this list included that). Right now $this is handled by
a special zval not stored in the local or global
On 5/17/06, Ilia Alshanetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1 for
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
So
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
+1
Edin
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
So, would that make it - non cents?
...sorry, couldn't resist
-D
On May 16, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
So please throw in your +1/-1
Darrell Brogdon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://darrell.brogdon.net
http://phpflashcards.com
Hello Ilia,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
I gave my best on this. But be sure. I'll just ignore any whining on
any change that has a E_STRICT in older versions when doing changes
in any version after 5.2.
Also
Hello Ilia,
second try of second part this time using static. I guess i need sleep.
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
If we go that road i suggest we simply drop support for STATIC. Fixing
the issues
On 16-May-06, at 7:50 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Ilia,
Wednesday, May 17, 2006, 1:26:37 AM, you wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
While doing all the stuff we wanted for 5.2 we also added
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR. This includes stuff that was E_ERROR before
-1 on both here, E_STRICT can wait and dynamic static variables are
pretty pointless, the workaround is clearer than the kludge..
StaticClass::$options['somekey'] = 'value';
Regards
Alan
Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going
On 5/16/06, Ilia Alshanetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1.
--Wez.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth flaming
going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR should
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
+1
Addition of support for dynamic statics ala: class foo {} foo::$bar = 1;
-1
--
Brian Moon
-
http://dealnews.com/
Its good to be cheap =)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit:
On 17.5.2006 1:26 Uhr, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
There are 2 PHP 5.2 changes there has been a lot of back and forth
flaming going around and we need to finally come to a decision about.
The two topics are:
Inclusion of E_STRICT and E_RECOVERABLE_ERROR into E_ALL
-1, especially for
40 matches
Mail list logo
