On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Alex Conta wrote:
> There is no doubt that setting ICMP rate limiting per node in a router
> with both slow and fast interfaces to accomodate one interface may be
> very detrimental to the other: imagine T1 and 1Gbit Ethernet interfaces;
> 1% of a T1s 1.5Mbit/sec is 15kbit/se
G'day Jinmei, it was nice to meet you in San Diego!
> My meta-level concern is that if we explicitly mentioned the
> unsolicited NA the intent of the NA would be rather unclear. In fact,
> even rev01 of the optimistic-dad draft doesn't talk about the real
> intent (i.e., a signal for mobility-sup
On 2004-08-05, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
> I've read this since I left the microphone. I stick to my guns -
> the statement "Requests for type value assignments from outside of the
> IETF should be sent to the IETF for review." is too vague and needs to
> be more specific, as in
>
> "should be ad
Brian, Peka,
There is no doubt that setting ICMP rate limiting per node in a router
with both slow and fast interfaces to accomodate one interface may be
very detrimental to the other: imagine T1 and 1Gbit Ethernet interfaces;
1% of a T1s 1.5Mbit/sec is 15kbit/sec, which is 0.0015% of a
1Gb
Brian,
Since I had promised some work on this, I have collected the following information. It
would be great to get your views on the same, before putting further efforts.
>I think we will have to leave existing IANA assignments in place,
>but I will think a bit more about that.
Addressing this
Alex Conta wrote:
Are there any implementations were ICMP rate limiting is implemented
separately from other protocol packets traffic management (traffic
shaping)?
HP has at least one UNIX that does ICMPv6 and Mobility Header in common
code, Linux does ICMPv4/v6 together on a per-route basis.
I
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 18:38 -0700, Takeo Shibata wrote:
> Hi Christina
>
> Thank you for your great advise.
> It works!
>
> BTW, I just configured the IPv6 on my Linux PC.
> It shows fe80::x/64
> So it says that scope is /64 instead of
> %1, or %2 ...
>
> And from Linux, I successfullty ping
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Alex Conta wrote:
> Are there any implementations were ICMP rate limiting is implemented
> separately from other protocol packets traffic management (traffic
> shaping)?
Certainly. For example Linux and BSD only rate-limit ICMP. Many OSes
in fact don't have any limiting for
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Thomas Narten wrote:
> > I am not clear about how this review will work in practical. So let
> > say I am an outsider and I wanted some ICMP types, should I send a
> > mail to IANA copying [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and secretriate) or I send a mail
> > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (copying
Mukesh,
It makes more sense to have ICMP rate limiting implemented through
general traffic management mechanisms, rather than completely
separately. Packet schedulers have an association with the egress
(outgoing) interfaces.
About a year or more ago, when I last checked with a couple of popula
Are there any implementations were ICMP rate limiting is implemented
separately from other protocol packets traffic management (traffic
shaping)?
If an IP implementation has support for traffic management, the packet
schedulers (traffic shaping) associated with interfaces, handle ICMP
rate lim
> I am not clear about how this review will work in practical. So let
> say I am an outsider and I wanted some ICMP types, should I send a
> mail to IANA copying [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and secretriate) or I send a mail
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (copying secretriate).
IMO, what you should do is write a
>From another thread:
From: Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 12:42:22 -0400
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Early IANA Allocation of Standards Track Codepoints' to BCP
FWIW,
Hi,
A could of quick comments on draft-daniel-ipv6-ra-mo-flags-00.txt.
Editorial suggestion: please switch to use XML2RFC. Pretty please!
Two bigger issues:
1) This document doesn't seem to take a stance what happens when/if the host
has multiple routers (whether on the same or different inter
14 matches
Mail list logo
