Re: Issue 20: Node Requirements - DHC vs. RA text

a feature that is considered experimental rather than standards track. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-06.txt

not define internal storage formats within an application or database./ Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https

Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-6man-text-addr-representation-06.txt

, then I think it's out of scope. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

Re: Are IPv6 auto-configured addresses transient?

to another network and it's ethernet port swapped out with another. Addresses for anonymity might be considered transient since they seem to change upon reboot. Antonio Querubin 808-545-5282 x3003 e-mail/xmpp: t...@lava.net IETF IPv6

Re: Review requested: draft-kawamura-ipv6-text-representation-02

. Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

Re: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?

. -- Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

RE: what problem is solved by proscribing non-64 bit prefixes?

than $150? How about less than $250? $500? :( Sorry for the digression. -- Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6

Re: Checksum in IPv6 header

this is assuming that layer 2 CRC has been circumvented. Router CPU is also a network resource and would be consumed if checksum was required - adding to overall latency, possibly additional hardware costs... Antonio Querubin whois: AQ7-ARIN

Re: Proposed IPv4-compatible IPv6 Deprecation text

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Bob Hinden wrote: Here is what I hope is the final text that specifies the deprecation of the IPv4-compatible IPv6 address. Included below are the revised sections IPv6 Addresses with Embedded IPv4 Addresses and IANA Consideration. Please review. I hope to submit an

Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that at least all the BSD's and most Linuxes are using this. They allow binding on :: (IPv6 any) and also accept IPv4 connections on the same socket, OpenBSD doesn't allow this. FreeBSD and

Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question

than complete removal. Ie. add a statement to the effect of 'Embedded addresses are intended for internal representation only'. Antonio Querubin Pacific LightNet Communications / Hawaii OnLine System Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] (808) 791-2898