John Spence wrote:
Hi Bob - thanks for the quick reply. Three things:
1) If I have autoconfiguration enabled, and I autoconfigure a
global-scope address from an RA where the valid lifetime is greater than
zero (the usual case certainly), I would normally respond to connections
from other nodes
> On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 12:50:51 -0400,
> "John Spence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I would like the capability to have an interface construct a link-local
> address via some mechanism (EUI-64 from MAC, as an example) as normal,
> then configure a privacy address, all without autoconfigurin
Hinden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 1:27 PM
To: John Spence
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Is there any provision in privacy addressing,
autoconfiguration, or ND specifications to have privacy address and *not
have* autoconfigured addresses?
John,
> I would like the
John,
I would like the capability to have an interface construct a link-
local
address via some mechanism (EUI-64 from MAC, as an example) as normal,
then configure a privacy address, all without autoconfiguring a
global-scope address from the RA being sent on the subnet (there would
be no vali
John Spence
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Is there any provision in privacy addressing,
autoconfiguration, or ND specifications to have privacy address and *not
have* autoconfigured addresses?
Hi John,
Please find comments inline
Cheers
Suresh
John Spence wrote:
> My reading of the cu
Hi John,
Please find comments inline
Cheers
Suresh
John Spence wrote:
My reading of the current and proposed specs are that privacy addresses
may be generated in addition to autoconfigured addresses (of scope
greater than link-local). Is there any provision for having **only**
privacy addr
My reading of the current and proposed specs are that
privacy addresses may be generated in addition to autoconfigured addresses (of
scope greater than link-local). Is there any provision for having *only* privacy addresses, and no
autoconfigured addresses? This would make it more difficu
