> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 2:49 PM
> To: Gupta Mukesh.K (Nokia-NET/MtView); [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Security considerations of the ICMPv6 draft
>
>
> At 13:41 20/04/2005 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > * I have not read t
At 13:41 20/04/2005 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * I have not read the latsts update of the IPsec specs. Do
> they know state
> it clearly that if you're using IPsec, you should drop those
> ICMP messages
> that arrive without IPsec authentication? (If not, IPsec won't help).
The new IPsec Sec
Fernando,
> A few comments on this text:
>
> * I have not read the latsts update of the IPsec specs. Do
> they know state
> it clearly that if you're using IPsec, you should drop those
> ICMP messages
> that arrive without IPsec authentication? (If not, IPsec won't help).
The new IPsec Secur
At 14:35 13/04/2005 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
===
6. As the ICMP messages are passed to the upper-layer
processes, it is possible to perform attacks on the
upper layer protocols (e.g., TCP) with ICMP [TCP-attack].
Protecting the upper layer with IPsec mitigates this
f.org
> Subject: RE: Security considerations of the ICMPv6 draft
>
>
> At 13:57 11/04/2005 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >I agree that we should add some words to raise awareness
> >about the ICMP-based attacks. We could add the text that
> >Pekka sug
At 13:57 11/04/2005 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that we should add some words to raise awareness
about the ICMP-based attacks. We could add the text that
Pekka suggested in the security consideration section and
provide an informative reference to your draft.
That'd be a good thing.
I
Hi Mukesh,
On Apr 11, 2005, at 14:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando,
I agree that we should add some words to raise awareness
about the ICMP-based attacks. We could add the text that
Pekka suggested in the security consideration section and
provide an informative reference to your draft.
Sound
-
> From: ext Fernando Gont [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 9:35 PM
> To: Pekka Savola
> Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; Gupta Mukesh.K (Nokia-NET/MtView)
> Subject: Re: Security considerations of the ICMPv6 draft
>
>
> At 02:24 09/04/2005 +0300, Pekka Savola
At 02:24 09/04/2005 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
I think the ICMPv6 draft should add some words to raise awareness about
ICMP-based attacks that can be performed against transport protocols.
Any text suggestions -- just to have an idea how verbose and explicit
you're looking at; did you refer to th
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Fernando Gont wrote:
I think the ICMPv6 draft should add some words to raise awareness about
ICMP-based attacks that can be performed against transport protocols.
Any text suggestions -- just to have an idea how verbose and explicit
you're looking at; did you refer to the prop
o: ipv6@ietf.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Security considerations of the ICMPv6 draft
>
> Folks,
>
> I sent some comments off-list to Mukesh, and he suggested to raise them on
> the list.
>
> I think the ICMPv6 draft should add some words to raise awareness about
> I
Folks,
I sent some comments off-list to Mukesh, and he suggested to raise them on
the list.
I think the ICMPv6 draft should add some words to raise awareness about
ICMP-based attacks that can be performed against transport protocols.
For example, the current draft suggest IPsec, or no checks at
12 matches
Mail list logo
