On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 09:16 -0400, Brian Haberman wrote:
Hi Pars,
One issue I see with this is string internationalization.
Defining the format of a name is not trivial given the current work to
internationalize names, strings, etc. to support languages that do not
use a
Hi Pars,
One issue I see with this is string internationalization.
Defining the format of a name is not trivial given the current work to
internationalize names, strings, etc. to support languages that do not
use a Latin-based alphabet. For example, how would one format a name
in a
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 17:04 -0700, Peter Sherbin wrote:
Pars,
Why would you need IETF to tell you which human name format to use.
Technically any
and all bits to the right of the network boundary are yours and you can do
with them
whatever you want.
Hi,
That's right, we can do
Pars,
Why would you need IETF to tell you which human name format to use. Technically
any
and all bits to the right of the network boundary are yours and you can do with
them
whatever you want.
Thanks,
Peter
--- Pars MUTAF [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
For example, we are in the
Hello,
For example, we are in the same campus. The campus is covered
by a single subnet with several wireless access points. I need
to call you. But there is a problem and I can't get the IPv6 address
of your cellular phone (DNS, or MIPv6 home agent failure).
But, I suspect
that you are
Pars,
Ignoring for now if this is good or bad idea, but you might look at
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-
lookups-15.txt
It looks like ICMP name lookups can also be used to do the same thing.
However, I couldn't understand why I would use a side protocol
Hi,
On Jun 8, 2006, at 4:35 AM, ext Pars Mutaf wrote:
Hello,
Is there a standard way of constructing
an interface ID from human name?
Ignoring for now if this is good or bad idea, but you might look at
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-
lookups-15.txt
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 23:35 +0900, Ruri Hiromi wrote:
Thanks Pars,
now it goes more clear to me. But I still wonder that this must be
solved/proposed in ecrit-wg. Anyway, I will read it through.
Ok thanks.
But my earthquake example was an example.
I think this is a networking topic,
Thanks Pars,
now it goes more clear to me. But I still wonder that this must be
solved/proposed in ecrit-wg. Anyway, I will read it through.
On 2006/06/12, at 17:35, Pars Mutaf wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 17:18 +0900, Ruri Hiromi wrote:
Hi Pars,
I got it, I can imagine what you
Hi Pars,
I got it, I can imagine what you want to do.
SIP has similar mechanism that you want, I suppose, so that what is
the merit on this?
Sorry for my primitive question.
Regards,
On 2006/06/12, at 17:00, Pars Mutaf wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-12 at 15:35 +0900, Ruri Hiromi wrote:
I am
Hello,
Please find the following Internet Draft
on generating an IPv6 interface id from a human name.
The main idea is that human name is easy to remember,
and consequently I can construct your IPv6 address
if I know you, and I can reach you (in some cases).
Hello,
Is there a standard way of constructing
an interface ID from human name?
I would like to configure an interface ID
hash(ParsMutaf| 1) and if it collides
hash(ParsMutaf| 2) etc..
You can try reach or locate me
by sending a packet to (please do not
hesitate):
subnetprefix |
12 matches
Mail list logo
