[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1492:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1492.patch
Attached patch. I plan to commit soon.
Allow
Allow readOnly OpenReader task
--
Key: LUCENE-1492
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1492
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib/*
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657013#action_12657013
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. I too created the fallback version (just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657019#action_12657019
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. This is very interesting and odd - I can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657024#action_12657024
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
I guess I can't get away with my new index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657024#action_12657024
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/16/08 7:47 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657019#action_12657019
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/16/08 7:47 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657019#action_12657019
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/16/08 7:47 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1410:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1410e.patch
The 1410e patch splits off a FrameOfRef class as the superclass
Yes, typo.. long day yesterday
Uwe Schindler wrote:
I've only read through the jdoc of tier so far, but I'm guessing it's
doing a dictionary search and splitting the the index readers position
based on the result being less than or greater than upper / lower values.
Which may be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1493.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 727063.
Enable setting hits queue size in
Jason,
Is your need for IndexReader.clone entirely driven by needing a fast
way to swap in your own deleted docs?
Meaning, if you could plug in your own deleted docs to a reader
(somehow), would you not use clone anymore?
Mike
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Hello,
In trying to figure out
Enable setting hits queue size in Search*Task in contrib/benchmark
--
Key: LUCENE-1493
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1493
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656928#action_12656928
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1484:
{quote}
Found it ant test-core.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1492.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.4.1)
Committed revision
LUCENE-1483, LUCENE-831, LUCENE-1314
Helps for realtime.
5. Is there anything we would need to deprecate now if we were to take
advantage of 1.5 concurrent packages?
The contrib ParallelMultiSearcher
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:54 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656988#action_12656988
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410:
--
I'd like to split off the performance test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657000#action_12657000
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
I tested the query 1, which gets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657007#action_12657007
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1487:
{quote}
Perhaps it's enough that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656997#action_12656997
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
When I run MatchAllDocsQuery (2M
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656964#action_12656964
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
Can you post your inefficient
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1493:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1493.patch
Attached patch. It adds a search.num.hits config
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1483:
Attachment: LUCENE-1483.patch
Okay, here is the super inefficient ords version.
Mike,
needing a fast way to swap in your own deleted docs?
Yes, however it is necessary to have a new IndexReader as well from a
reopened reader. So clone seems the best approach (unless there's a way
I'm not seeing). The clone
code is coming along, the norms test seems to pass. As long as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12656944#action_12656944
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1316:
Yonik is your patch here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657135#action_12657135
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Or can it? Over int.max/2 unique ids and then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657135#action_12657135
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/16/08 11:59 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657143#action_12657143
]
Greg Shackles commented on LUCENE-1438:
---
I ran into this same problem. Some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657135#action_12657135
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/16/08 12:17 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657147#action_12657147
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
{quote}
I was testing with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657151#action_12657151
]
Robert Newson commented on LUCENE-831:
--
I was wondering if the next version of the
: 1) Use a modified SpanNearQuery. If we assume that country + phone will always
: be one token, we can rely on the fact that the positions of 'au' and '5678' in
: Fred's document will be different.
:
:SpanQuery q1 = new SpanTermQuery(new Term(addresscountry, au));
:SpanQuery q2 = new
So it seems like a cloned reader would share everything with the
previous reader, but these rules would be enforced:
* If the old reader had pending changes (held the write lock) when
it was cloned, it 1) transfers the write lock to the clone, 2)
refuses any further changes to itself
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1438?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657161#action_12657161
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1438:
These two are not so simple to tackle. They are
ie snapshot the previous reader without going through disk as
intermediary, right?
Yes.
refuses any further changes to itself (freezes itself)
Should I create a new variable for refuse updates/freeze or use readonly?
If the variable is true then inside of doClose throw an exception? If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1314:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.9
IndexReader.clone
-
Key:
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
ie snapshot the previous reader without going through disk as
intermediary, right?
Yes.
refuses any further changes to itself (freezes itself)
Should I create a new variable for refuse updates/freeze or use
readonly? If the variable is true then inside of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657205#action_12657205
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
{quote}
I guess I can't get
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:00 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Is your need for IndexReader.clone entirely driven by needing a fast way to
swap in your own deleted docs?
Could this be done with a FilteredIndexReader subclass that keeps
track of additional deletions?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657227#action_12657227
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. I think you can use an int for the ords?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657237#action_12657237
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. Admittedly, this is a very small (tiny)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657227#action_12657227
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/16/08 4:30 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657243#action_12657243
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
But, with this new approach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657244#action_12657244
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
{quote}
Prob is 1 one then, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657245#action_12657245
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Okay, I guess thats fair enough. I was going to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657247#action_12657247
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. I think the perf gains are very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657245#action_12657245
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/16/08 5:29 PM:
I posted this same question for the same reasons a while back...
http://markmail.org/message/mji7jnpa5xjfflmw
I'm looking at local lucene and trying to figure out how it could go
into lucene. As is, locallucene depends on solr since it needs
NumberUtils.
Any change of heart for moving it
My thoughts... bring over any simple functions like these are that are
generally useful.At a quick glance, the functions in Solr's
NumberUtils are generally useful and fit well in Lucene's
NumberTools. What's the harm?
Erik
On Dec 16, 2008, at 9:14 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Additional features for searching for value across multiple fields (many-to-one
style)
--
Key: LUCENE-1494
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1494
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Cowan updated LUCENE-1494:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1494-multifield.patch
Patch for part 1. Introduces a new sublcass of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Cowan updated LUCENE-1494:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1494-positionincrement.patch
Patch for part 2). This follows the my original
Hi Hoss,
Thanks for the reply. I've created a JIRA issue to track this --
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1494
the initial thought was that just removing the
term1.field=term2.field assertion would allow something liek this to work,
but i don't think anyone every tried creating
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657281#action_12657281
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. and then seg 2 has just apple orange, then
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12657295#action_12657295
]
Paul Cowan commented on LUCENE-1494:
2 things about those patches:
1) I did them
55 matches
Mail list logo
