On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> lucene wrote:
>> Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the
>> /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing).
>>
>>
> I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I
> give the exact link f
> > lucene wrote:
> > > Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the
> > > /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing).
> > >
> > >
> > I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I
> > give the exact link for the users announcement. I figure
> lucene wrote:
> > Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the
> > /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing).
> >
> >
> I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I
> give the exact link for the users announcement. I figured the PMC coul
lucene wrote:
> Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the
> /Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing).
>
>
I did that on purpose, since we have the contrib changes as well - I
give the exact link for the users announcement. I figured the PMC could
find thei
Chris Hostetter wrote:
> : http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/lucene2.9/
>
> +1
>
>
>
> -Hoss
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...
Andi Vajda wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
>>
>> : - db/bdb fails to compile with 1.4 because of a ClassFormatError in
>> one of
>> : the bundled libs, so this contrib is in reality 1.5 only.
>>
>> there's not much we can do about that, no one can blame us if the
>> depende
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: - db/bdb fails to compile with 1.4 because of a ClassFormatError in one of
: the bundled libs, so this contrib is in reality 1.5 only.
there's not much we can do about that, no one can blame us if the
dependency requires 1.5
I don't think it req
: http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/lucene2.9/
+1
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
: - db/bdb fails to compile with 1.4 because of a ClassFormatError in one of
: the bundled libs, so this contrib is in reality 1.5 only.
there's not much we can do about that, no one can blame us if the
dependency requires 1.5
: - Tests of contrib/misc use String.contains(), which is 1.5 only.
+1
ship it!
Erik
On Sep 21, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Okay, lets give this a shot:
The (proposed) release artifacts have been built and are up at:
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/lucene2.9/
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Okay, lets give this a shot:
>
> The (proposed) release artifacts have been built and are up at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/lucene2.9/
>
> The changes are here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/
+1 to release!
Mark, make sure when you include the changes link that it has the
/Changes.html part (your link gives you the dir listing).
> BTW, going forward, I think we should be consistent w/ other ASF
> projects and call our artifacts apache-lucene-X.zip, etc. and the
> artifacts should unpa
> Two minor nits: The date in CHANGES.txt is wrong and I'm not crazy
> about the 1.5 stuff that Uwe mentioned, but agreed we can live with
> it. I so can't wait to flip that switch to 1.5 and be done with it
> for a little while (until we start debating 1.5/1.6).
I do not think a switch to 1.6 i
We went over the date in a previous thread on java-dev - since its just
an estimate anyway, we decided to leave it.
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> +1,
>
> Two minor nits: The date in CHANGES.txt is wrong and I'm not crazy
> about the 1.5 stuff that Uwe mentioned, but agreed we can live with
> it. I so
+1,
Two minor nits: The date in CHANGES.txt is wrong and I'm not crazy
about the 1.5 stuff that Uwe mentioned, but agreed we can live with
it. I so can't wait to flip that switch to 1.5 and be done with it
for a little while (until we start debating 1.5/1.6).
BTW, going forward, I think
I just checked - its there - added 9/17/2009 - the 4096-bit key.
Along with 2 early, low bit keys I had tried early on.
Mark Miller wrote:
> I had - to MIT - not finding it? I can try again.
>
> - Mark
>
> http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
>
> On Sep 24, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll
I had - to MIT - not finding it? I can try again.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Sep 24, 2009, at 6:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
Mark,
Please add your key to a public server. See
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#public-key-not-found
-Grant
On Sep 21
Mark,
Please add your key to a public server. See
http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing.html#public-key-not-found
-Grant
On Sep 21, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Okay, lets give this a shot:
The (proposed) release artifacts have been built and are up at:
http://people.apache.or
-Original Message-
> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 7:07 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; gene...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.9.0
>
> Okay, lets give this a shot:
>
> The (proposed) relea
+1
Good job everyone!
On Win XP, Sun JVM 1.6.0_16 I ran the following tests:
lucene-2.9.0.zip:
- ant compile-demo
- ant demo-index-html
- ant demo-search-html
- ant demo-index-text
- ant demo-search-text
- ant jar-demo
- ant war-demo
- ant clean
Everything works fine. The only thing I'm wonder
I'll get to an official vote tonight or tomorrow AM, but thanks in
advance for all the hard work.
On Sep 21, 2009, at 1:06 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
Okay, lets give this a shot:
The (proposed) release artifacts have been built and are up at:
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/l
Okay, lets give this a shot:
The (proposed) release artifacts have been built and are up at:
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/lucene2.9/
The changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/staging-area/lucene2.9changes/
Please vote to officially release these artifac
22 matches
Mail list logo
