Hi.
Just add a Sort object to the search.
Sort sort = new Sort(sortField, !ascending);
Hits[] hits = searcher.search(query, sort);
Kindly
//Marcus
On 11/5/07, jackxin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does someone know how to sort the hits list by a specified document field?
Even if the field is
Solr has an issue outstanding right now that implements something that
may be close to what you want. They are calling it Field Collapsing.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
-Grant
On Nov 5, 2007, at 12:57 AM, Marcus Herou wrote:
Hi.
I have a situation where I'm
Hello,
I have the following problem with my lucene index.
When indexing fields containing special characters (like ), a blank space
is inserted before the special character. For example: the content
L'article is indexed as L apos; (with a blank space between 'L' and
'amp;').
Is there
Can you explain more of what you are trying to do? Lucene just works
with text, it is up to you to extract the text from whatever format it
is in. That being said, you can try searching the archives of this
list as a starting point. You might also check out Aperture
Sorry, I did a mistake in my previous email.
The field L'article is indexed as L apos;article. The blank space is
inserted between 'L' and 'apos;article'.
Thanks,
Leire
-Message d'origine-
De : Leire Urcelay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : lundi, 5. novembre 2007 13:02
À :
You could search this list about distributing your indexes, etc.
RemoteSearchable may be handy, but you will probably have to build
some infrastructure around it for handling failover, etc. (would make
for a nice contribution)
How often do you think archived data will need to be accessed?
As you suggest you could either roll the index on the local machine or
remote and gzip the content fileds on the archive index and provide a
GzipReader when you need to search old results.
If money is of the essence then the best solution probably is to have 1 good
box with fast SCSI disks which
Can TermDocs be reused i.e. can you do.
TermDocs docs = reader.termDocs();
docs.seek(term1);
int i = 0;
while (docs.next()) {
i++;
}
docs.seek(term2);
int j = 0;
while (docs.next()) {
j++;
}
Reuse does seem to work but I get ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions from
BitVector it I
Thanks. They seem to have got real far in the dev cycle on this. Seems like
it will hit the road in Solr 1.3.
However I would really like this feature to be developed for Core Lucene,
how do I start that process?
Develop it yourself you would say :) I'm serious isn't it a really cool and
useful
Hi!
Imagine an index holding documents in different languages and country.
Language+country is what I call a context and I build and hold a QueryFilter
for each context.
When performing a fuzzy search, FilteredTermEnum doesn't care about any
contexts at all (well, how should it :). It builds
Unfortunately, no. Once open, the IndexReader/IndexSearcher searches
a frozen point in time snapshot of the index as it existed when it
was first opened.
You'll have to open a new searcher in order to see the changes.
However, there is work underway now to add a reopen method to
IndexReader
On 11/5/07, Mike Streeton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can TermDocs be reused i.e. can you do.
TermDocs docs = reader.termDocs();
docs.seek(term1);
int i = 0;
while (docs.next()) {
i++;
}
docs.seek(term2);
int j = 0;
while (docs.next()) {
j++;
}
Reuse does seem to work
There are several issues here
1 How are you getting the entity reference? You must be encoding
the stream (or getting it encoded for you). So the first thing I'd do
is un-encode it.
2 After that, it's a question of what Filters/Analyzers you're using.
Take a look at ISOLatin1AccentFilter. I'm
Hello Group,
I have a requirement in my project where I need to display
related items for any select item in the group. I am not sure whether this can
be possible. Let me tell you that all our documents are indexed and for any
document selected by user, we need to display
On Nov 5, 2007, at 7:49 AM, Marcus Herou wrote:
Thanks. They seem to have got real far in the dev cycle on this.
Seems like
it will hit the road in Solr 1.3.
However I would really like this feature to be developed for Core
Lucene,
how do I start that process?
Develop it yourself you
Hi Marcus,
Thanks for providing these suggestions. I will work on these directions
with my team.
Regards,
Sandeep.
On 11/5/07, Marcus Herou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you suggest you could either roll the index on the local machine or
remote and gzip the content fileds on the archive
Hi Grant,
Thanks for providing these suggestions. I will work on these directions
with my team.
Regards,
Sandeep.
On 11/5/07, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You could search this list about distributing your indexes, etc.
RemoteSearchable may be handy, but you will probably have
We have an e-mail server / Calendar Server / Address book etc. And we are
planning on to use Lucene for searching through the respective stores. I am
aware that I have convert every thing in to a format acceptable to Lucene.
But I would like to see if any one out there, has done this previously
Hi All,
We are trying to fetch the TermFreq from the lucene index, using
IndexReader.getTermFreqVectors().
But the problem here is, if none of the fields in the index is Vectorized,
then the above function call returns null. In my index, none of the fields
are vectorized. Without re-creating the
Hi All,
I have an index without does not have the termFreqVector stored in it. I do
not want to recreate the index as it is a big index and took a lot of time
while creation. Is their a other way for generating the termFreqVector with
the available info for all the documents.
Any help will be
20 matches
Mail list logo
