[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/security/test EJBAccessUnitTestCase.java ProjRepositoryUnitTestCase.java SecurityProxyUnitTestCase.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 23:55:41 Removed: src/main/org/jboss/test/security/test EJBAccessUnitTestCase.java ProjRepositoryUnitTestCase.java SecurityProxyUnitTestCase.java Log: Remove the non-standard securi

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/developers/guide buildsystem-faq.jsp

2001-11-20 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/11/20 23:16:57 Modified:src/docs/developers/guide buildsystem-faq.jsp Log: o Added a section to the faq on module hooks. Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +71 -1 newsite/src/docs/developers/guide/buildsystem-faq.jsp Index: buildsystem-faq.j

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-11-20 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 188 Successful tests: 152 Errors:24 Failures: 12 [time of test: 21 November 2001 6:28 GMT] [java.version:

Re: [JBoss-dev] Marshalling exceptions on optimized calls

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
Because if its local call that can't be optimized and there is an application exception that is returned without marshalling the exception handler code can see a ClassCastException due to different class loaders. Even without a potential class loader issue, all values including exceptions need t

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-11-20 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 173 Successful tests: 139 Errors:22 Failures: 12 [time of test: 21 November 2001 5:31 GMT] [java.version:

[JBoss-dev] JSR-77 Update

2001-11-20 Thread Andreas Schaefer
Hi Geeks Today I added a new update to the JSR-77 update which should give you an idea how JSR-77 will work. It contains: - type=J2EEManagement (management domain) - type=J2EEServer (JBoss server instance meaning the logical server) - type=Node (computer box meaning the physical server) J2EEMana

[JBoss-dev] Marshalling exceptions on optimized calls

2001-11-20 Thread marc fleury
GenericProxy.invokeContainer(O,M,O) we have if (optimize && isLocal) and then else if local marshaling of exception (ca line 369) I remember there was a reason why we do this but I can't remember it and can't rebuild it as I rewrite these classes. Does anyone remember? marcf

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/management/j2ee NodeMBean.java IpAddress.java J2EEManagedObject.java J2EEServer.java Node.java SingleJBossServerManagement.java

2001-11-20 Thread Andreas Schaefer
User: schaefera Date: 01/11/20 20:50:53 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/management/j2ee IpAddress.java J2EEManagedObject.java J2EEServer.java Node.java SingleJBossServerManagement.java Added: src/main/org/jboss/management/j2ee NodeMBea

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/etc/conf/default jboss-service.xml

2001-11-20 Thread Andreas Schaefer
User: schaefera Date: 01/11/20 20:50:53 Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss-service.xml Log: Added a Node to JSR-77 implementation and added the mbean example to jboss-service.xml to test it. Revision ChangesPath 1.15 +9 -1 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/jboss-se

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: thirdparty/sun/jsr77/lib jsr77.jar

2001-11-20 Thread Andreas Schaefer
User: schaefera Date: 01/11/20 20:50:54 Modified:sun/jsr77/lib jsr77.jar Log: Added a Node to JSR-77 implementation and added the mbean example to jboss-service.xml to test it. Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +8 -7 thirdparty/sun/jsr77/lib/jsr77.jar <>

[JBoss-dev] Deployment question (classpath)

2001-11-20 Thread David Maplesden
Hi All, well Hi David Jencks mostly I guess ;-), With the new deployment system I have started deploying my application by simply deploying the *service.xml file and including all the jars it uses in a element. This works very well, I can easily keep all my jars together in a lib directory and

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: Is there a dtd for jbosscmp-jdbc.xml files?

2001-11-20 Thread Dain Sundstrom
> Here is a dtd that may work for jbosscmp-jdbc, based on a > large example > Dain sent me. > > Except for a couple of "description" typos, the psgml parser > apparently > not liking empty elements and one question, I think it agrees > with the doc > Dain sent. 2 things: > > - There is one

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-11-20 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 188 Successful tests: 152 Errors:24 Failures: 12 [time of test: 21 November 2001 3:59 GMT] [java.version:

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs printable.css

2001-11-20 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/11/20 19:42:08 Modified:src/docs printable.css Log: o forgot to save file before commit =( Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +5 -0 newsite/src/docs/printable.css Index: printable.css ==

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs printable.css head.jsp index.jsp main.css navigation.jsp slogan.jsp

2001-11-20 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/11/20 19:21:09 Modified:src/docs head.jsp index.jsp main.css navigation.jsp slogan.jsp Added: src/docs printable.css Log: o consolidated common styles from /developers into /main.css only specifying those colors that chan

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/developers webstyle.jsp cvs.jsp head.jsp index.jsp main.css navigation.jsp slogan.jsp

2001-11-20 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/11/20 19:21:09 Modified:src/docs/developers cvs.jsp head.jsp index.jsp main.css navigation.jsp slogan.jsp Added: src/docs/developers webstyle.jsp Log: o consolidated common styles from /developers into /main.css only spec

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results

2001-11-20 Thread chris
JBoss daily test results SUMMARY Number of tests run: 188 Successful tests: 150 Errors:25 Failures: 13 [time of test: 21 November 2001 3:12 GMT] [java.version:

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/common picateam.jsp

2001-11-20 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/11/20 18:42:55 Modified:src/docs/common picateam.jsp Log: o randomly setting the image alignment to "left" or "right" to spice up things a little bit more =) Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +6 -5 newsite/src/docs/common/picateam.jsp

[JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-docs] Is the build system too complicated?

2001-11-20 Thread Jason Dillon
I have not found an easy way to provide this common setup/initialization stuff as a resource. Perhaps if I could tell the JAXP parser to read a resource file when parsing this could be done, but that would require the Ant entity hooks to be installed to handle that. Perhaps they have done tha

[JBoss-dev] Re: Is there a dtd for jbosscmp-jdbc.xml files?

2001-11-20 Thread David Jencks
Here is a dtd that may work for jbosscmp-jdbc, based on a large example Dain sent me. Except for a couple of "description" typos, the psgml parser apparently not liking empty elements and one question, I think it agrees with the doc Dain sent. 2 things: - There is one

[JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-docs] Is the build system too complicated?

2001-11-20 Thread David Jencks
It has often seemed to me that there is substantial duplication between the setup parts of the module level build.xml files. I sure haven't figured out a clue of a way to reduce this, but if it could be done, it might make the files a little less intimidating. In light of the vast improvement ov

Re: [JBoss-dev] redesigning J2EE packaging

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
I agree that we need to much better notion of what constitutes an application deployment, and I would generalize this into the concept of application domains. Not that your necessarily implying this, but focusing on a single XML file as the centerpiece is not a fundamental design criterion. I'm al

RE: [JBoss-dev] Re: Is there a dtd for jbosscmp-jdbc.xml files?

2001-11-20 Thread Ignacio Coloma
Send it to the list for the records, please. If you find problems generating the DTD say so. Ignacio. > I think XML spy can do this. Send me the XML and I'll try tonight. > > Regards, > Hiram ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jbosspool/src/main/org/jboss/pool/connector ManagedConnectionPoolFactory.java

2001-11-20 Thread Doug Ferguson
User: thedug Date: 01/11/20 15:48:44 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/pool/connector Tag: Branch_2_4 ManagedConnectionPoolFactory.java Log: factory.destroy is now implemented to destroy the managed connection. Revision ChangesPath No

RE: [JBoss-dev] Current CVS build.

2001-11-20 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I updated about 20 minutes ago and it works fine for me. -dain > -Original Message- > From: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [JBoss-dev] Current CVS build. > > > When running a JBOSS build from CVS Nov 2

[JBoss-dev] Current CVS build.

2001-11-20 Thread Dave Smith
When running a JBOSS build from CVS Nov 20, 17:00 EST it now does not start. Here is the starting sequence. (It shuts down by itself). The config files did work with the build from 2 days ago. ./run.sh JBoss Boot

Re: [JBoss-dev] ObjectPool - Invalidate On Error

2001-11-20 Thread David Jencks
On 2001.11.20 16:37:28 -0500 "Ferguson, Doug" wrote: > So it appears that the ConnectionInPool is getting removed from the pool > but is inner connection is never getting closed. > > I am thinking that the best approach is to obtain the JDBC connection > by calling getUnderlyingConnection. then

[JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-docs] Is the build system too complicated?

2001-11-20 Thread Jason Dillon
I think I am going to split off the running (jboss, testsuite, whatever) bits into scripts (probably generated by the build system), which developers could then use to run things. This will allow for greater flexiblity (such as redirecting or not) and will simplify the build.xml files. Thanks

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Okay. Your file works and gives me an error that it can't find 'MyDS'. I'll have to go back through and see where I screwed up. Thanks everyone for their input and that bug report can be closed as it does not apply. Hunter > From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:

RE: [JBoss-dev] ObjectPool - Invalidate On Error

2001-11-20 Thread Ignacio Coloma
I'm having a (related?) issue. When I hot-redeploy several times I end up with no available connections on mysql and the ear cannot deploy. My app only uses CMP, and even if I call no bean and only redeploy three or four times I get the same error. I have to bounce the server back. No problem sinc

RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Dain Sundstrom
With this exact jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file java:/MyDS true true true true false 300 false true foreign-key I get the following log messages: [2001-11-20 16:17:22,229,CMP,DEBUG] Loading standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml : file:/ho me/d

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/etc/conf/default hsqldb-default-service.xml

2001-11-20 Thread David Jencks
User: d_jencks Date: 01/11/20 14:15:23 Modified:src/etc/conf/default hsqldb-default-service.xml Log: Added some warning comments about the anonymous mbean-ref to hsqldb Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +5 -1 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/hsqldb-default-service.xml I

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-478090 ] EJBLocalHome interface NOT passivateable

2001-11-20 Thread noreply
Bugs item #478090, was opened at 2001-11-04 13:20 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=478090&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Peter Levart (plevart)

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Sorta... I can see that the datasource now starts properly. Still, my jar is trying to use DefaultDS instead of the 'Groundswell' ds I defined... > From: Torsten Schlumm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 21:49:31 + (GMT) > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: R

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Torsten Schlumm
David, updating wasn't the problem but the ..-service.xml I simply didn't see one line JBOSS-SYSTEM:service=Hypersonic which I forgot to delete (I used thehsqldb-default-service.xml as a template). Sorry, it was completely my fault. Thanks anyway. Cheers Torsten PS: does that help you, Hunt

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-456467 ] Add in URLWizzard fails for top files

2001-11-20 Thread noreply
Bugs item #456467, was opened at 2001-08-29 03:26 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=456467&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 3 Submitted By: Peter Antman (pra) Assigned to: Andreas Sc

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/deployment URLWizzard.java

2001-11-20 Thread Andreas Schaefer
User: schaefera Date: 01/11/20 13:43:53 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment URLWizzard.java Log: Took the fix for bug #456467 in current CVS. Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +8 -2 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/deployment/URLWizzard.java Index: URLWizzard.java ==

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread David Jencks
I think you need to remove the anonymous mbean-ref unless you actually have a mbean named JBOSS-SYSTEM:service=PostgreSQL. If you do, what does it do? If not, your ConnectionFactoryLoader will never get started since it is waiting for an mbean you have no plans to create, ever. The original ano

RE: [JBoss-dev] ObjectPool - Invalidate On Error

2001-11-20 Thread Ferguson, Doug
So it appears that the ConnectionInPool is getting removed from the pool but is inner connection is never getting closed. I am thinking that the best approach is to obtain the JDBC connection by calling getUnderlyingConnection. then call close() on that connection If I get the ok. I will do th

[JBoss-dev] Is the build system too complicated?

2001-11-20 Thread Jason Dillon
Please let me know if you think that the build system is too complicated, or if there is some part of the system which is too complicated. --jason ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss

RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Torsten Schlumm
Hunter, try to remove the line JBOSS-SYSTEM:service=PostgreSQL from your postgres-service.xml (or however it's called). I think that should solve the problem. If I understand the whole process right then this means the datasource thingy depends on a service 'PostgreSQL' and therefore doesn't st

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Okay, maybe I made a mistake. Still, I'm not sure exactly where. I don't get that message in my log file... Still, I have a file called 'jbosscmp-jdbc.xml' in my META-INF directory of my jar file, along with a jboss.xml file and a ejb-jar.xml file... Hunter > From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTE

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: newsite/src/docs/developers cvs.jsp

2001-11-20 Thread Jason Dillon
User: user57 Date: 01/11/20 13:34:48 Modified:src/docs/developers cvs.jsp Log: o removed jboss-website (and website alias) from the public module list o changed [zip] & [tgz] button style back to previous form, since they were easier on the eye. Revision Changes

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Hunter Hillegas
At this point I have no idea what to do next... > From: Dave Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:12:56 -0500 > To: Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Jencks > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Torsten Schlumm > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JBoss Dev >

RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Dain Sundstrom
This section of code is called three times. 1) defaults section of standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml 2) defaults section of jbosscmp-jdbc.xml 3) entity section for each entity specified in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml The first time it will be null. Are you getting a message like in your DEBUG log like this: [200

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Dave Smith
Weird. So this has to point to either the standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml or jbosscmp-jdbc.xml. What's really strange is the default is null. This should come from standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml. What else is strange is that it thinks in jboss-cmp-jdbc.xml for each entity you have a datasource element. M

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Hunter Hillegas
I'm not so sure. Despite having my jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file included, I get this on the console as it deploys my beans after I made Dave's change: [13:02:37,433,Default] Entity = ProductAttribute java:/DefaultDS null [13:02:37,437,Default] Entity = Product java:/DefaultDS null [13:02:37,439,Default

RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS? (Postgres and CMP 2)

2001-11-20 Thread marc fleury
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS? (Postgres and CMP 2) that is not true   marcf -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bunker, DanSent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 9:59 AMTo: JBoss DevSubject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 2

RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Funny. I just did that but in org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStoreManager line 110 where the datasource is looked up. And it successfully looks up my new datasource. I think you have a different problem. I changed the name of the hypersonic data source. May be the problem is your postgresql d

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/deployment URLWizzard.java

2001-11-20 Thread Andreas Schaefer
User: schaefera Date: 01/11/20 12:46:15 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/deployment Tag: Branch_2_4 URLWizzard.java Log: Fixed bug #456467 by not adding a '/' when file in the root directory to go along with JAR tool. Revision ChangesPath No

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-456467 ] Add in URLWizzard fails for top files

2001-11-20 Thread noreply
Bugs item #456467, was opened at 2001-08-29 03:26 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=456467&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 3 Submitted By: Peter Antman (pra) Assigned to: Andreas

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Dave Smith
Well if you want to get down and dirty in jboss/server/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/metadata/JDBCEntityMetaData.java line 336 is where it sets the datasouce for each entity. On line 343 you could add System.out.println("Enity = "+entityName+" "+dataSourceNameString+" "+defaultValues.g

[JBoss-dev] ObjectPool - Invalidate On Error

2001-11-20 Thread Ferguson, Doug
We have just noticed that whenever our code throws a SQLException, the connection pool continues to grow. Apparently the connections that get "invalidated" aren't ever cleaned up. These grow until Oracle bails. I am looking at ObjectPool right now to see if I can figure it out. If anybody alre

[JBoss-dev] redesigning J2EE packaging

2001-11-20 Thread Anatoly Akkerman
Hi, I've been observing some of the recent threads on the list and reflected on my current project. Mark has mentioned something of the sort that j2ee packaging sucks. I certainly agree. Here is what seems to be a better design that is consistent with JBoss philosophy. Please, don't flame, thes

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-456467 ] Add in URLWizzard fails for top files

2001-11-20 Thread noreply
Bugs item #456467, was opened at 2001-08-29 03:26 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=456467&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Peter Antman (pra) >Assigned to: Andreas Scha

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-435463 ] Distributed transactions

2001-11-20 Thread noreply
Bugs item #435463, was opened at 2001-06-22 07:10 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=435463&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v2.2.2 (stable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) >Assigned to

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Are we sure that the datasource name in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml is even being checked properly? I gave my config another look and it seems correct. Here are is the console log output: [11:43:51,571,AutoDeployer] Auto deploy of file:/Users/hunter/Desktop/jboss-3.0.0alpha/deploy/postgresqldb-default-ser

Re: [JBoss-dev] Application/Deployment Units

2001-11-20 Thread VASQUEZ_JASON
thx -- i'll keep an eye out for it... -jason Andreas Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/20/2001 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: [JBoss-dev] Application/Deployment Units Hi Right now there is no more management informa

RE: [JBoss-dev] 1 to Many Relations

2001-11-20 Thread Dain Sundstrom
> Uncle. It seems that JBOSS is designed assuming that it has > full control of creating tables. This isn't really true. JBossCMP makes the assumption that if the table structure is not specified the Application Deployer does not care what the structure is, as long as it runs. I strongly reco

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: manual/src/xdocs jbossdocs.xml resource.xml jdbc-database.xml

2001-11-20 Thread David Jencks
User: d_jencks Date: 01/11/20 10:35:30 Modified:src/xdocs jbossdocs.xml resource.xml Removed: src/xdocs jdbc-database.xml Log: Added Sybase ConnectionFactoryLoader example and removed 2.4-specific db documentation. Revision ChangesPath 3.1 +2 -26 manual/

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread David Jencks
Have you guys included the latest updates to the ConnectionFactoryLoader configuration format? The hsqldb example has been updated, the manual likewise for mysql and postgres. If updating is not the problem, could you post your cfl config? does DefaultDS get started properly on your system? Than

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: manual/src/xdocs/howto howtojetty.xml howtopetstore.xml howtojca.xml howtomssql.xml

2001-11-20 Thread David Jencks
User: d_jencks Date: 01/11/20 10:35:31 Modified:src/xdocs/howto howtojetty.xml howtopetstore.xml Removed: src/xdocs/howto howtojca.xml howtomssql.xml Log: Added Sybase ConnectionFactoryLoader example and removed 2.4-specific db documentation. Revision ChangesPath

Re: [JBoss-dev] IBM AS/400 (tm), it seems to be running right. kick webshmere ass

2001-11-20 Thread Andrew Scherpbier
Ernst, Before you attempt to do what you suggest, I would suggest you first do some analysis of your environment. There are some things that you need to be aware of. The first thing you need to do is determine if there is a performance problem. What are your performance goals? What makes you

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Torsten Schlumm
Hunter, I've seen the same thing with mySQL today (it did work with the CVS sources from about 3 weeks ago). After having a closer look at the list of registered MBeans (localhost:8082) I found it (at least something :) My mysqlDS was perfectly registered but not started. After starting it by ha

Re: [JBoss-dev] Bug #482875: Out of Memory

2001-11-20 Thread David Budworth
Yep, you fixed it. Thank you. -David On Sunday 18 November 2001 11:14pm, David Jencks wrote: > OK, I think I fixed the "can't undeploy broken mbean" problem, with a > testcase too. (in jmx/test/DeployServiceUnitTestCase). > > Could you check and make sure I fixed the problem you were seeing? >

Re: [JBoss-dev] Application/Deployment Units

2001-11-20 Thread Andreas Schaefer
Hi Right now there is no more management information available. But soon the implementation of JSR-77 should provide you with the necessary informations. Have fun - Andy - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 8:10 AM Subje

Re: [JBoss-dev] IBM AS/400 (tm), it seems to be running right. kick webshmereass

2001-11-20 Thread Adrian Brock
Ernst, I'm not sure what your asking here. You should be able to run the distribution from QSH. DISCLAIMER: I haven't done this myself! I don't own a AS/400. I think you've done some of this, but I'll list it for completeness. 1) Build the distribution on your PC or Un*x machine ant probably

RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Test cases

2001-11-20 Thread Dain Sundstrom
This jar (junitejb.jar) is an ejb-jar file. JUnitEJB uses a session bean to run the test cases on the serverside. There are about a billion ways to package this. The three styles I have used follow: * An ejb-jar with a class-path ref to junit.jar in the MANIFEST-MF. * An ejb-jar with junit.jar

Re: [JBoss-dev] 1 to Many Relations

2001-11-20 Thread Dave Smith
Uncle. It seems that JBOSS is designed assuming that it has full control of creating tables. Well in my case I already have a database allready set up so my view of things is how do I stuff this database into JBOSS. I don't think it is worth the discussion which approach is right or wrong but,

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-483847 ] Change to Datasource Not Picked Up

2001-11-20 Thread noreply
Bugs item #483847, was opened at 2001-11-20 08:42 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=483847&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v2.5 Rabbit Hole (unstable) Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Hunter Hillegas (hunterhi

Re: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS?

2001-11-20 Thread Hunter Hillegas
Good idea, but my DOCTYPE is correct, exactly as is below... I assume it is using 2.0 persistence since it doesn't choke on the relationships or the new entity bean structures... > From: Peter Levart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:28:54 +0100 > To: Hunter Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECT

[JBoss-dev] Application/Deployment Units

2001-11-20 Thread VASQUEZ_JASON
Hi all -- Sorry for such a newbie question, but Is there any place with jboss (working with rh) which stores data about *all* pieces of an application deployment at runtime? For instance, I can get the "DeployedApplications" attribute from the ContainerFactory MBean, which gives me an I

[JBoss-dev] IBM AS/400 (tm), it seems to be running right. kick webshmere ass

2001-11-20 Thread Ernst Bekker
I unzipped 2.4.1 on our as400 v5r1 at work. The server runs without any complaints. Unfortunately I am a java newby. (don't stop reading now). The as400 can compile java classes into native as400 byte code that runs like lightning. What I would like to contribute is as/400 CL and RPG code to make

Re: [JBoss-dev] Ignorance

2001-11-20 Thread Rickard Öberg
Sacha Labourey wrote: > In RMI's Bible, hum, I mean Rickard's book, Hehe, I was just reading the bible, I mean.. uhm, anyway.. to be sure. It's always a good idea to do this, especially in such a controlled environment as we have, with little need for allowing upgrades in the system over ti

Re: [JBoss-dev] Ignorance

2001-11-20 Thread Rickard Öberg
marc fleury wrote: > |The automatic serversion generation of RMI uses heavy reflection > |also on the > |method signatures > |and leads to CNFE´s in these cases. > > So it is faster to include the serversion or not? I am thinking a lot about > ways to make these fast. It is most definitely fas

RE: [JBoss-dev] Ignorance

2001-11-20 Thread Sacha Labourey
Hello, In RMI's Bible, hum, I mean Rickard's book, if I well remember, it is written that if the serialversion is not explicitely set in the class, it must be dynamically computed when loading the class => takes much more time when loading the class if this is not explicitely set.

AW: [JBoss-dev] Ignorance

2001-11-20 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
I guess, serversion is only computed once per VM & class (ObjectStreamClass is cached) ... CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. November 2001 16:24 An: Jung , Dr. Christoph; Jboss-Development (E-Mail) Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev]

RE: [JBoss-dev] Ignorance

2001-11-20 Thread marc fleury
|The automatic serversion generation of RMI uses heavy reflection |also on the |method signatures |and leads to CNFE´s in these cases. So it is faster to include the serversion or not? I am thinking a lot about ways to make these fast. marcf | |CGJ | | | |__

RE: [JBoss-dev] CVS update: contrib/catalina/src/main/org/jboss/web/catalina EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX.java EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSXMBean.java Log4jLogger.java

2001-11-20 Thread marc fleury
dude, I went to bed at 2 am with invoker madness in my head, but you are even worse :) marcf |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott |M Stark |Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 4:54 AM |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS upd

RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS? (Postgres and CMP 2)

2001-11-20 Thread Bunker, Dan
Title: RE: [JBoss-dev] 2.0 jar Really Likes DefaultDS? (Postgres and CMP 2) I have been developing with CMP 2 and postgresql for the last 2 weeks.  Things seem to be going OK for what I'm using it for.  I have seen some interesting things with the transaction types.  It appears that rabit hol

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/logging TracePriority.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 02:52:18 Added: src/main/org/jboss/logging Tag: Branch_2_4 TracePriority.java Log: Move the TracePriority to the logging package Revision ChangesPath No revision No revisi

Re: [jetty-discuss] Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss3/Jetty Security...

2001-11-20 Thread Julian Gosnell
Thanks, Scott, I'll do the necessary. Jules --- Scott M Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JBoss security managers are not scoped. Every > application referring to > the java:/jaas/domainX security manager is using the > same instance and > executing the same JAAS login configuration. For the

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/logging LoggerMBean.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 02:41:18 Removed: src/main/org/jboss/logging Tag: Branch_2_4 LoggerMBean.java Log: The Logger is not an MBean anymore ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/l

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/util CounterInterceptor.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 02:40:54 Removed: src/main/org/jboss/util Tag: Branch_2_4 CounterInterceptor.java Log: Move to the ejb/plugins package to limit cross package imports ___ Jboss-development mailing list

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss3/Jetty Security...

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
JBoss security managers are not scoped. Every application referring to the java:/jaas/domainX security manager is using the same instance and executing the same JAAS login configuration. For the particular case of two webapps referring to the same security domain via the jboss-web.xml security-dom

[JBoss-dev] JBoss3/Jetty Security...

2001-11-20 Thread Julian Gosnell
Another small question for Scott... Are JBoss Realms scoped within a Server namespace, or an Application ? i.e. If 2 webapps see a Realm with the same name - is it the same Realm instance ? Currently I am working under the assumption that the answer is "no" - but I'm open to suggestion. Thank

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: contrib/tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/tomcat EmbeddedTomcatService.java EmbeddedTomcatServiceMBean.java EmbeddedTomcatServiceSX.java EmbeddedTomcatServiceSXMBean.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:49:01 Modified:tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/tomcat Tag: Branch_2_4 EmbeddedTomcatService.java EmbeddedTomcatServiceMBean.java EmbeddedTomcatServiceSX.java Embedd

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: contrib/catalina/src/main/org/jboss/web/catalina EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX.java EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSXMBean.java Log4jLogger.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:54:19 Modified:catalina/src/main/org/jboss/web/catalina Tag: Branch_2_4 EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX.java EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSXMBean.java Log4jLogger.java Log: Change to the uni

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: contrib/tomcat/src/build build.xml

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:49:00 Modified:tomcat/src/build Tag: Branch_2_4 build.xml Log: Change to the unified log4j based org.jboss.logging.Logger class. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.15.2.8 +4

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/metadata BeanMetaData.java MetaData.java XmlFileLoader.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:55 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/metadata Tag: Branch_2_4 BeanMetaData.java MetaData.java XmlFileLoader.java Log: Change to the unified log4j based org.jboss.logging.Logger class. Revision ChangesPath No

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/proxy Proxies.java ProxyProxy.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:56 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/proxy Tag: Branch_2_4 Proxies.java ProxyProxy.java Log: Change to the unified log4j based org.jboss.logging.Logger class. Revision ChangesPath No revision

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/naming ExternalContext.java JNDIView.java NamingService.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:55 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/naming Tag: Branch_2_4 ExternalContext.java JNDIView.java NamingService.java Log: Change to the unified log4j based org.jboss.logging.Logger class. Revision Chang

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/logging/log4j CategoryWriter.java TracePriority.java JBossCategory.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:54 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging/log4j Tag: Branch_2_4 CategoryWriter.java TracePriority.java Removed: src/main/org/jboss/logging/log4j Tag: Branch_2_4 JBossCategory.java Log: Change to t

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/metadata CMPFieldMetaData.java JawsApplicationMetaData.java JawsXmlFileLoader.java MappingMetaData.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:51 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/metadata Tag: Branch_2_4 CMPFieldMetaData.java JawsApplicationMetaData.java JawsXmlFileLoader.java MappingMetaData.java Log: Change to the unified log4

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: contrib/tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/tomcat/security JBossSecurityMgrRealm.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:49:01 Modified:tomcat/src/main/org/jboss/tomcat/security Tag: Branch_2_4 JBossSecurityMgrRealm.java Log: Change to the unified log4j based org.jboss.logging.Logger class. Revision ChangesPath No r

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/mail MailService.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:54 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mail Tag: Branch_2_4 MailService.java Log: Change to the unified log4j based org.jboss.logging.Logger class. Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/tm TransactionManagerService.java TxCapsule.java TxManager.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:56 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/tm Tag: Branch_2_4 TransactionManagerService.java TxCapsule.java TxManager.java Log: Change to the unified log4j based org.jboss.logging.Logger class. Revision Ch

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/tm/usertx/server ClientUserTransactionService.java UserTransactionSessionImpl.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:56 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/tm/usertx/server Tag: Branch_2_4 ClientUserTransactionService.java UserTransactionSessionImpl.java Log: Change to the unified log4j based org.jboss.logging.Logger class

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/logging Log4jService.java Logger.java ConsoleLogging.java ConsoleLoggingMBean.java DefaultLog.java FileLogging.java FileLoggingMBean.java Log.java LogStream.java LogToCategory.java LogWriter.java ViewerLogging.java ViewerLoggingMBean.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:54 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/logging Tag: Branch_2_4 Log4jService.java Logger.java Removed: src/main/org/jboss/logging Tag: Branch_2_4 ConsoleLogging.java ConsoleLoggingMBean.java

[JBoss-dev] CVS update: jboss/src/main/org/jboss/management ContainerManagement.java ServerDataCollector.java

2001-11-20 Thread Scott M Stark
User: starksm Date: 01/11/20 01:42:54 Modified:src/main/org/jboss/management Tag: Branch_2_4 ContainerManagement.java ServerDataCollector.java Log: Change to the unified log4j based org.jboss.logging.Logger class. Revision ChangesPath No

  1   2   >