[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBPM-82) InvocationLogImpl maps it's internal java.util.Date field to a timestamp

2005-03-17 Thread Armin Haaf (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-82?page=comments#action_12316245 ] Armin Haaf commented on JBPM-82: It should be easy to solve, use java.util.Date as type in the mapping instead of timestamp. But the better solution might be to use java.sql.Tim

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: TimeoutExceptions from TreeCache.callRemoteMethods()

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The package is org.jboss.test.cache.test.local;. Do a find on jboss-head/testsuite/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870712#3870712 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870712

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: portlet-instance

2005-03-17 Thread yxyang
>From http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossPortalArchitecturePortalContainer Is the following the reason? Instance : a instance of a component. Its configuration is copied from the component configuration and may be customized. Thus is to possible to have several component running wit

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - portlet-instance

2005-03-17 Thread yxyang
hi Is portlet-instances.xml is jboss portal specific thing? I cannot find this in the JSR168. >From the user reference, it is known that preference is defined in this >descriptor file. But JSR168 already include portlet-preference. Why does jboss >portal handle preference like this? thanks

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: M4 planning

2005-03-17 Thread djmalan
I have not had much time to work on this project lately, as I'm sure you've noticed (yes, I did pick up the subtle hints from Andy ;)). However, summer is getting to an end here, and so is the fishing season :(. I will be able to spend more time on the project from the end of next week. As far

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.892 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050318003949Lbuild.892 BUILD COMPLETE - build.892Date of build: 03/18/2005 00:39:49Time to build: 21 minutes 40 secondsLast changed: 03/17/2005 23:09:56Last log entry: Initial checking for m

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Testcase :failure

2005-03-17 Thread rajdeep_dua
This is the simple test case i was talking about in the previous topic,connection.getClientID fails, Is it a bug or a functionality to be implemented? public void testClientID() { | //log.info("inside testQueueConection"); | try { | connection = c

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite Build Failed

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20050317225350 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:66: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbos

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Can we start writing jms test clients to check complianc

2005-03-17 Thread rajdeep_dua
For check on compliance i am following the specification itself. each api call has various senarios where things can bomb or atleast there is a risk! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870702#3870702 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/inde

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Can we start writing jms test clients to check complianc

2005-03-17 Thread rajdeep_dua
Adrian objectwebs test cases you are talking about - are they same as the joram test suite. i had intergrated it with pramat's jms server 3 years back. i think they have upgraded the test suite for 1.1 version also. we can integrated those test cases. My first test client failed yesterday con

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-86) finish RMIJRMPServerImpl implementation

2005-03-17 Thread Tom Elrod (JIRA)
finish RMIJRMPServerImpl implementation --- Key: JBREM-86 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-86 Project: JBoss Remoting Type: Task Components: jmx remoting Versions: JMX Remoting 1.0.1 Reporter: Tom Elrod

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-85) implement RMI IIOP

2005-03-17 Thread Tom Elrod (JIRA)
implement RMI IIOP -- Key: JBREM-85 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBREM-85 Project: JBoss Remoting Type: Task Components: jmx remoting Versions: JMX Remoting 1.0.1 Reporter: Tom Elrod Assigned to: Tom Elrod Fix For: J

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.891 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050317214440Lbuild.891 BUILD COMPLETE - build.891Date of build: 03/17/2005 21:44:40Time to build: 27 minutes 6 secondsLast changed: 03/17/2005 17:36:32Last log entry: XSD for Simple Types

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBAS-1508) JBoss AS needs JSF

2005-03-17 Thread Stan Silvert (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1508?page=history ] Stan Silvert closed JBAS-1508: -- Resolution: Done > JBoss AS needs JSF > -- > > Key: JBAS-1508 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1508 > Proje

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBAS-1508) JBoss AS needs JSF

2005-03-17 Thread Stan Silvert (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1508?page=history ] Stan Silvert updated JBAS-1508: --- Version: (was: JBossAS-4.0.2 Final) (was: JBossPOJOServer-1.0 Alpha) (was: JBossAS-5.0 Alpha)

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1508) JBoss AS needs JSF

2005-03-17 Thread Stan Silvert (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1508?page=comments#action_12316244 ] Stan Silvert commented on JBAS-1508: Done. See http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossFaces > JBoss AS needs JSF > -- > > Key: JBAS-1508 >

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix build.79 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20050317203802Lbuild.79 BUILD COMPLETE - build.79Date of build: 03/17/2005 20:38:02Time to build: 45 minutes 4 secondsLast changed: 03/17/2005 12:27:06Last log entry: introduced Dyna

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - jboss portal start up problem

2005-03-17 Thread yxyang
Hi I check out jboss portal from cvs head. And jboss-4.0.1sp1 is running. After deploying jboss-portal core and try to start the jboss application server, One error msg is displayed although i still can access http://127.0.0.1:8080/ which was customized to the jboss portal entry URL. The whole

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix build.110 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050317191638Lbuild.110 BUILD COMPLETE - build.110Date of build: 03/17/2005 19:16:38Time to build: 52 minutes 19 secondsLast changed: 03/17/2005 13:18:03Last log entry: removing cas

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBAS-1595) Integrate EJB3 stable into JBoss 4.x

2005-03-17 Thread Ivelin Ivanov (JIRA)
Integrate EJB3 stable into JBoss 4.x Key: JBAS-1595 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1595 Project: JBoss Application Server Type: Feature Request Reporter: Ivelin Ivanov Assigned to: Bill Burke Priority: Criti

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBAS-1595) Integrate EJB3 stable into JBoss 4.x

2005-03-17 Thread Ivelin Ivanov (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1595?page=history ] Ivelin Ivanov updated JBAS-1595: Component: EJBs > Integrate EJB3 stable into JBoss 4.x > > > Key: JBAS-1595 > URL: http://jira.jboss.com/

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1378) Need tcp configuration variation of the cluster unit tests

2005-03-17 Thread Ovidiu Feodorov (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1378?page=comments#action_12316240 ] Ovidiu Feodorov commented on JBAS-1378: --- The current clustering target ("tests-clustering" of testsuite/build.xml) works by creating two server configuration node0 and

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1378) Need tcp configuration variation of the cluster unit tests

2005-03-17 Thread Scott M Stark (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1378?page=comments#action_12316241 ] Scott M Stark commented on JBAS-1378: - Yes, that is what I was looking for. > Need tcp configuration variation of the cluster unit tests > ---

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 build.442 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050317175601Lbuild.442 BUILD COMPLETE - build.442Date of build: 03/17/2005 17:56:01Time to build: 39 minutes 22 secondsLast changed: 03/17/2005 13:18:03Last log entry: removing castor depende

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Assigned: (JBAS-1378) Need tcp configuration variation of the cluster unit tests

2005-03-17 Thread Ovidiu Feodorov (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1378?page=history ] Ovidiu Feodorov reassigned JBAS-1378: - Assign To: Ovidiu Feodorov (was: Bela Ban) > Need tcp configuration variation of the cluster unit tests > ---

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Thoughts on James Mailet API?

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't read everything, and it's been a long while since I looked at the mail stuff, so I don't know if this is practical. But how about a JBoss Mail mail listener that acts as a "container" for maillets written to the James API? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Some JBOSSCache questions...

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. Yes, using cacheloader implies every put is persisted so it has performance implication. 2. If the node is evicted and not persisted, it will return null. So it is application responsibility to check this. 3. We have overflowing persistence (or passivation) feature in our roadmap. -Ben Vie

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: TimeoutExceptions from TreeCache.callRemoteMethods()

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you are under the right module except the directory is lock instead of aop. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870683#3870683 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870683 ---

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Fetch state on startup in TreeCacheAOP

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is what I tried and it works for me. Since the deault is true on FetchStateOnStartuo, I ran the tutorial example from bsh and then I ran "build.sh run.aop.demo" to open up an aop demo gui. From the gui, I can see the data. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?mod

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Eclipse IDE (dev)] - Re: Run XDoclet does nothing

2005-03-17 Thread timryoungblood
I'm in the same boat. The Tutorial mentions an XDoclet Configuration within the project properties, but it is not there. I believe the AOP plug-ins are needed for this, correct? I added them after the initial plugin so maybe I'll reinstall. Tim View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/in

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tend to agree, but don't expect such a feature before our Final release in June. After that, I can probably work on it and Julien can decide where it fits in the roadmap. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870680#3870680 Reply to the post : ht

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott and I had a conversation. We are going to look at generating the ObjectModel from a schema using JBossXB. This will need some feedback from Alex. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870676#3870676 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/inde

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread arosen
I take it it's not production worthy. I'm working on a commercial site that's gotta have stability. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870675#3870675 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870675

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
actually I did it once for nukes and it worked. thomas is supposed to do it for jbpm soon, so it is not impossible to have it back. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870671#3870671 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&o

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it has been removed from the codebase but is still in the CVS View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870673#3870673 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870673 ---

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread arosen
Is it standard with nukes or was it just a hack? I looked at Nukes but didn't find such functionality. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870672#3870672 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870672

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in that case, it needs serious hacking View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870669#3870669 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870669 --- SF em

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2 build.313 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20050317145048Lbuild.313 BUILD COMPLETE - build.313Date of build: 03/17/2005 14:50:48Time to build: 48 minutes 38 secondsLast changed: 03/17/2005 12:27:06Last log entry: introduced DynamicSubsc

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the thing is that jsp must be located in the war file and cms file are located in a database. jsp are not designed to be stored in the db, for that you should consider another scripting language. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870667#3870667

[JBoss-dev] [TODO -- DEVELOPMENT] - j2se module

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to create a j2se module in jboss head This would be similar to the j2ee module to provide a repository for all the java and javax classes that we maintain for backwards compatibility with older jvms, e.g. javax.management for jmx (not required with j2se5) javax.xml.namespace (not required w

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread arosen
Maybe so, but I'm sure such a feature would be popular. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870670#3870670 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870670 -

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread arosen
JSP is the language I need to go with. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870668#3870668 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870668 --- SF ema

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread arosen
Have you found any that manage JSP files? Any recommendations? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870665#3870665 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870665 --

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread cuoz
This would be a great feature, and is the main reason why I have been considering portals other than JBoss Portal. It is seems pretty limiting to have the CMS only be able to manage static files. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870663#3870663

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: TimeoutExceptions from TreeCache.callRemoteMethods()

2005-03-17 Thread monocongo
Thanks Bela. What would be the exact path in the CVS repository for this test class? Starting from here http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss the closest thing I can find is jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/aop/test/TxLockUnitTestCase.java, but I don't think that this is what you're re

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBPM-82) InvocationLogImpl maps it's internal java.util.Date field to a timestamp

2005-03-17 Thread Grïgory Joseph (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-82?page=comments#action_12316234 ] Grïgory Joseph commented on JBPM-82: Tom, This is basically due to a jdk1.5 change in the java.sql.Timestamp class: * @since 1.5 */ // This forwarding metho

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Thoughts on James Mailet API?

2005-03-17 Thread jfrosch
Andy, Thank you for your reply. Jack View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870659#3870659 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870659 --- SF ema

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: TimeoutExceptions from TreeCache.callRemoteMethods()

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It depends on how you access the cache. Take a look at TxDeadlockUnitTestCase and method testPutDeadlock(). With pessimistic locking, this deadlock is *unavoidable*, and you will get a deadlock every single time. If you have a little test case that would help View the original post : http://ww

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: JBossCache 1.2.1 released

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't run it on JDK 1.5, but I see no reason why it shouldn't run there. Can you try and report your experience here ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870654#3870654 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Currently this is not possible. Even if we allowed the cms to serve jsp (currently), they would not be compiled and you would probably only see the raw jsp page as html. In the future, perhaps. It would be a nice feature, but then we'd have to deal with the editor handling them and not messing

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.890 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050317130828Lbuild.890 BUILD COMPLETE - build.890Date of build: 03/17/2005 13:08:28Time to build: 50 minutes 56 secondsLast changed: 03/17/2005 12:25:46Last log entry: introduced DynamicSubs

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBCACHE-113) ConcurrentModificationException in TransactionTable

2005-03-17 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
ConcurrentModificationException in TransactionTable --- Key: JBCACHE-113 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-113 Project: JBoss Cache Type: Bug Versions: 1.2.1 Reporter: Bela Ban Assigned to: Bel

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Resolved: (JBCACHE-113) ConcurrentModificationException in TransactionTable

2005-03-17 Thread Bela Ban (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-113?page=history ] Bela Ban resolved JBCACHE-113: -- Resolution: Done Fixed by switching HashMap to ConcurrentReaderHashMap > ConcurrentModificationException in TransactionTable > -

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread arosen
I apologize if this question is simple, but I'm unclear on a few concepts. I was wondering how the Portal CMS serves the files. Would it allow jsp code to be interpreted by the server? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870647#3870647 Reply to the

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Closed: (JBAS-1359) Remove the castor dependency for the snmp adapter, use jbossxb

2005-03-17 Thread Dimitris Andreadis (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1359?page=history ] Dimitris Andreadis closed JBAS-1359: Resolution: Done snmp-adaptor now uses JBossXB (MappingObjectModelFactory & GenericObjectModelFactory). There are slight differences between the 4

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - M4 planning

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I have some things that are in M3 that may get pushed to M4 (namely the JCA stuff). I also have the IMAP initiative starting off during M4 (though what I mean by that is limited). Additionally, I've been entering follow up stuff and things that were in the Wiki into JIRA. We should still

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't believe our editor supports JSP tags or anything that isnt text/html or text/plain. I can look thru their forums once their site is up again and find out for sure. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870639#3870639 Reply to the post : htt

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: Thoughts on James Mailet API?

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What I'd really like it if you got involved in current initiatives before starting your own so that you first actually become familar with what is here and get used to working with the people HERE now. Otherwise you just become kind of a growth and don't get incorporated into the people side of

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: network registry hold local servers?

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NetworkRegistry will only contain servers from remote JVMs. I think I may have documentation that suggests otherwise (and if so and you know where that is, can you point it out for me?). It will only be populated if you have a detector running locally as well. If want just local servers, ca

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Fetch state on startup in TreeCacheAOP

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you create a JIRA bug report for this (http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE) ? This would be a pretty serious bug, and creating a JIRA report makes sure I don't forget about it ! If you can assign it to version 1.2.2, otherwise I'll do it View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/i

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Can we start writing jms test clients to check complianc

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd recommend reworking what is already in the testsuite to work over both JBossMQ and JBoss Messaging: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jbosstest/src/main/org/objectweb/jtests/ However, that is only jms1.0.2b level tests. Some of the JBossMQ tests are also pretty generic where they don

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anonymous wrote : | This change does have ramifications on the behavior of the jbossxb object factories because the latter form is throwing away object relationships. I don't understand what you are getting at? The only reason to name a bean is if you want it in the registry such that it can

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anonymous wrote : | You are asking for | property/ANY -> AbstractValueMetaData | and delegates the element parsing to this schema -> jbossxb/jaxb notion | Another issue that jumps out is how to reverse the process. e.g. Given an MC metadata config how do we identify the marshalling of th

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In case you were in any doubt, I HATE xml parsing :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870629#3870629 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870629 ---

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More on the ValueMetaData, I assume your wanting instead of: anonymous wrote : | | | ... | | | ... | | | somthing like this: anonymous wrote : | | | | | | | | ...

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: What I am (not) Looking For In A Java-Based Enterprise E

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you impelement a mailet api adapter which is non-invasive to the rest of the server (suggest a maillistener), I'll commit it provided it has good unit tests and you make it optional and maintain the build targets associated with it. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?mo

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : | Ok, so assign the associated task to me so I know its supported and I won't have a reason to ask again. | I'll need to look at Alex's new Sunday implementation to complete this work, since I need to have property/CDATA -> StringValueMetaData property/dependency

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: ConcurrentModificationException in TransactionTable

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, I have switched txs and tx_map from HashMap to ConcurrentReaderHashMap. This way, I don't need to synchronize at all. This will be in 1.2.2. Can you try this on your system and see whether you're still getting concurrent mod exceptions ? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anonymous wrote : | I answered this question before didn't I? In my critique of this approach. | | I am constructing the metadata that will construct the bean when dependencies | are satisfied. | | If the javabean has no dependencies (e.g. simple config object) | the object could

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - TimeoutExceptions from TreeCache.callRemoteMethods()

2005-03-17 Thread monocongo
I am getting TimeoutExceptions from the TreeCache when I run my application which is uses the TreeCacheAop MBean for synchronous replication. I have tried doubling the original value for the LockAcquisitionTimeout attribute but this appears to have no effect on the situation, and I can't see an

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread arosen
I tried wrting jsp in Nukes and although the source was saved properly, it wouldn't display the page. Do the developers of the CMS have in mind to be able to(maybe in the near future) manage and serve jsp files as well? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=view

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBMAIL-24) Mail that gets rejected with 5xx should be given back to user

2005-03-17 Thread Andrew Oliver (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-24?page=history ] Andrew Oliver updated JBMAIL-24: Version: 1.0-M3 > Mail that gets rejected with 5xx should be given back to user > - > > Key

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: ConcurrentModificationException in TransactionTable

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, your observation is correct. I have changed this in 1.2.2. In the meantime, please patch your local code. Thanks for this report ! View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870641#3870641 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=b

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Portal] - Re: manage jsp files

2005-03-17 Thread arosen
Fixed it myself by adding to jboss-portal-2.0-beta1-bin/portal-core.sar/portal-cms.war/WEB-INF/web.xml anonymous wrote : | | jsp | text/plain | | However, the editor still parses out the tags. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&o

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Some JBOSSCache questions...

2005-03-17 Thread abitha
Thank you for the quick response Ben. That helps. My main concerns are in the area of performance. >From what I read, if I use the cache loader, then every single node is >persisted on a backend store. Correct? Will that not be a big dent on >performance? What if I dont have/want a cache load

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
anonymous wrote : | You are asking for | property/ANY -> AbstractValueMetaData | and delegates the element parsing to this schema -> jbossxb/jaxb notion | This should NOT just be at the property level. Since to support the "use case" deployments we would need something like: deploymen

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 build.441 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050317122041Lbuild.441 BUILD COMPLETE - build.441Date of build: 03/17/2005 12:20:41Time to build: 23 minutes 32 secondsLast changed: 03/17/2005 11:26:24Last log entry: close connection left o

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - network registry hold local servers?

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a JBoss/Remoting server running - everthing is good. I then have an object that makes a JMX call to the Network Registry - calling getServers. I'm getting back an empty array. Does the registry only contain servers that are running on remote machines or remote JVMs? Or is it supposed t

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Thoughts on James Mailet API?

2005-03-17 Thread jfrosch
I'm curious about people's thoughts about the James Mailet API as a design for e-mail processing after it's been accepted by the SMTP server. (The api is described at http://james.apache.org/mailet_api_2_1.html) Since I've already received Andy's views on this, I'd like to hear from others abo

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Also, Adrian whats metadata for invoking on a constructor. See the examples I posted from the tests. There are four mechanisms: 1) Straight constructor invocation 2) Static factory 3) A factory instance constructed through IOC/Dependency injection 4) GenericBeanFactory

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: JBossCache 1.2.1 released

2005-03-17 Thread anu_atre
Bela, Can we use it on JDK 1.5? If it does't support 1.5, then when are planning to support it? Thanks Anu View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870619#3870619 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=

[JBoss-dev] [Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOPC question on the inner tag

2005-03-17 Thread kaarthik
final update...I copied | | | | | under and it WORKED. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870606#3870606 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870606

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Also, why not just borrow from the spring property model: | I essentially have the same thing? Certainly the underlying metadata model looks the same. The differencies I see are: 1) I have not description 2) I have no special element for java.util.Properties 3) I

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Messaging on JBoss (Messaging/JBoss)] - Re: Can we start writing jms test clients to check complianc

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your involvement. Yes, we are at the development stage when a JMS API client can be written, or at least, we're very close to that. Please look at the JMS Facade thread http://jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=61556, you'll see where we are. However, that client wou

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1391) Add support for datasource failover

2005-03-17 Thread Adrian Brock (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1391?page=comments#action_12316230 ] Adrian Brock commented on JBAS-1391: There is an even more important problem with the DataSource of DataSources approach. Any failover will bypass the transaction stickne

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The complexity possible in the nesting of bean properties is not evident from the current testcases, and it did not jump out at me that the java configuration of the jbossxb factory supports this. We should define a schema for the xml deployer's supported document syntax. The question to Alexey

[JBoss-dev] [Design of Mail Services] - Re: What I am (not) Looking For In A Java-Based E-mail Serve

2005-03-17 Thread jfrosch
>> Look, it sounds like you really like JAMES and want to use JAMES, so go use >> JAMES << Tsk Tsk Andy. Just because someone says he likes some design features of a competing piece of software is no reason to be so dismissive. There are things I think I would like about using James, like its

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head-jdk-matrix build.93 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20050317114737Lbuild.93 BUILD COMPLETE - build.93Date of build: 03/17/2005 11:47:37Time to build: 33 minutes 1 second  Unit Tests: (0)  Tota

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Not strictly a DTD issue but would be nice to able to "import" classes rather than be forced to use FQN all over the place... that would help a ton. | I'll have to think about that one. It requires interaction with the classloader which I definitly don't want to do

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBossXB] - Re: Reusing xml element definitions/bindings

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moved last API testcases to thier own unit testcase | package org.jboss.test.xml; | public class SundayUnitTestCase | Also added first runtime binding testcase (testRtBook) with selective binding customizations. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewt

[JBoss-dev] [Design the new POJO MicroContainer] - Re: Kernel XML format

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Does this support nested java beans, or is that the Beans as values item? Also, what about custom object factories based on namespaces? This is an example from head I'm working on for the legacy service descritpor: | I answered this question before didn't I? In my

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2 build.312 Build Successful

2005-03-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log2005031734Lbuild.312 BUILD COMPLETE - build.312Date of build: 03/17/2005 11:11:34Time to build: 26 minutes 53 secondsLast changed: 03/17/2005 09:36:31Last log entry: reduce debug->trace for

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBMAIL-51) Add support to Mozilla's thunderbird for POP over HTTPS

2005-03-17 Thread Andrew Oliver (JIRA)
Add support to Mozilla's thunderbird for POP over HTTPS --- Key: JBMAIL-51 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-51 Project: JBoss Mail Type: Sub-task Reporter: Andrew Oliver Assigned to: Andrew Oliver

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1391) Add support for datasource failover

2005-03-17 Thread Alexey Loubyansky (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1391?page=comments#action_12316228 ] Alexey Loubyansky commented on JBAS-1391: - You are right, Adrian. I'll look at your first suggestion. Thanks. > Add support for datasource failover >

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1551) Classloader bug (version > 3.2.3)

2005-03-17 Thread Bruno Melloni (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1551?page=comments#action_12316227 ] Bruno Melloni commented on JBAS-1551: - It might be relevant to the troubleshooting to mention that the JARs included in the WAR are log4j, hibernate and supporting JARs,

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBMAIL-47) SMTP Client Proxy

2005-03-17 Thread Andrew Oliver (JIRA)
SMTP Client Proxy - Key: JBMAIL-47 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-47 Project: JBoss Mail Type: Sub-task Reporter: Andrew Oliver Assigned to: Andrew Oliver The SMTP client proxy mimic's a real SMTP Server however it translates th

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBMAIL-46) POP Client Proxy

2005-03-17 Thread Andrew Oliver (JIRA)
POP Client Proxy Key: JBMAIL-46 URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMAIL-46 Project: JBoss Mail Type: Sub-task Reporter: Andrew Oliver Assigned to: Andrew Oliver The POP client proxy mimic's a real POP Server however it translates the r

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1551) Classloader bug (version > 3.2.3)

2005-03-17 Thread Bruno Melloni (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1551?page=comments#action_12316226 ] Bruno Melloni commented on JBAS-1551: - Note: If you see 2 versions of files, the smaller one corresponds to the minimal version of coA.ear (only log4j.jar, but no use of

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Profiler] - Re: JBossProfiler version 1.0 RC

2005-03-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You are hitting the wrong MBean. You were looking at the MBean for the J2EE application. Try this one: http://localhost:8080/jmx-console/HtmlAdaptor?action=inspectMBean&name=jboss.profiler%3Ambean%3DNative-profiler In the JMX-console list you will see a different one: jboss.profiler mbean=Nat

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss JIRA] Commented: (JBAS-1391) Add support for datasource failover

2005-03-17 Thread Adrian Brock (JIRA)
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1391?page=comments#action_12316225 ] Adrian Brock commented on JBAS-1391: Sean's comment is entirely unrelated to the problem. He is talking about *restarting* JBossMQ with a new DataSource/ConnectionURL ma

  1   2   >