On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 07:13, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hiram, I think you missed the point. Of course we could do this with
out requiring JMX; anything is possible. The point is if we agree that
JMX is always on the client side then entire system is simplified.
I guess
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 07:43, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Sounds good. What I want to configure is the aspects, not the
interceptors. The interceptors have to arrange themselves, travel to the
client, reside on the server, complement one another, ..
However, I don't really know, what the xml should
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] http transport
|Seems like I don't need an
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
Holger, your ideas are very interesting and thought provoking. Although I
disagree with a lot of them (read further), I believe that this is a good
conversion and something very cool will come out of it.
Actually I've already learned from this
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Sacha Labourey wrote:
Yes. But if we need to bootsrap the jndi communication, we can skip this
jndi lookup and just send the create invocation to the invoker. How the
invokers can be accessed must either be wellknown or somehow configured
on the client.
yes, the
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Holger Engels wrote:
That is local jndi. I am looking up the coded name in my local
jndi-namespace. The coded name is defined as an ejb-ref in my
application-client.xml. what I get is something, that feels like a proxy
to the ejb's home. the ejb-ref must be configured
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
ProxyFactory is not an MBean. Just an object right now. Config code,
creates and attaches ProxyFactorys to each EJB. (Each EJB is an mbean
though).
Still trying to understand ..
Seems like I don't need an HTTPInvoker. Only an HTTPInvokerProxy and a
I try to understand, how a http transport can be implemented within jboss
.. so what do I need?
on the server side:
o a connector servlet / extra http deamon, that accepts invocations
embedded in http posts. the result of a home invocation is a handle.
subsequent invocations (remote
]]On Behalf Of
Holger Engels
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 5:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] http transport
I try to understand, how a http transport can be implemented
within jboss
.. so what do I need?
on the server side:
o
Please insert these two lines into the JDBCCommand. The patch has been
applied to the 2.4 branch some time ago, but unfortunately didn't make it
into 3.0.
Description:
when a cmp field of type byte[] is written, it is written as a plain byte
array (no serialization takes place). when it is
On 12 Jun 2002, Dave Smith wrote:
Now I have my swing client running with a jboss backend I would like to
move this beast out on to the internet. Some of my clients have
firewalls that only allow them http and https access through a proxy, so
a direct connection is out. It would seem I
On 12 Jun 2002, Marius Kotsbak wrote:
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 14:03, Holger Engels wrote:
On 12 Jun 2002, Dave Smith wrote:
Now I have my swing client running with a jboss backend I would like to
move this beast out on to the internet. Some of my clients have
firewalls that only
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote:
As a quick work-around while I´m busy today with doing business (buaaeeeh:-(
Patch the java.lang.ClassLoader class ... Either remove the synchronized
keyword from loadClassInternal (should be safe)
or make it protected and remove the
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, David Jencks wrote:
IMO the j2ee spec does not clearly define the meaning of relative ejb-link
elements. It gives and example of
ejb-link../products/product.jar#ProductEJB/ejb-link
What does the .. mean?
I think it refers to this situation:
)
Attachment: a java source, that reproduces the error.
Proposal: make defaultLogin(..) synchronized.
Applies: at least to 2.4.4 and 3.0.0
Sorry, I tried to post this on sourceforge several times with both
konqueror and mozilla, but it didn't work.
Holger Engels
package reflect;
import
Actually it does not work .. here's a patch, that fixes at least the local
ejb-links. Mappings, that are specified in jboss.xml are not supported as
of the current implementation. Somebody else posted the same bug, see
jboss-Bugs-520454.
There's another problem left with ejb-links, that span
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, David Jencks wrote:
I'm working on some other modifications to Container and I will apply this
patch (if no one objects).
I think there is a big problem with the deployment order. Right now with
an ear that contains many ejb jars we deploy the jars individually in a
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Scott M Stark wrote:
The DeploymentInfo object groups all of the elements together in
a heirarchy of components. This object is not passed into the
method that creates these ejb links. We need to unify the objects
created to model the deployment and get rid of legacy
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Holger Engels wrote:
If I got it right, the following happens during deployment of an ear:
1. the MainDeployer unpacks the ear and iterates over the modules
2. the MainDeployer retrieves an apropriate deployer for each module
(e.g. EJBDeployer) and invokes
If I got it right, the following happens during deployment of an ear:
1. the MainDeployer unpacks the ear and iterates over the modules
2. the MainDeployer retrieves an apropriate deployer for each module
(e.g. EJBDeployer) and invokes the method deploy on it
3. The EJBDeployer creates an
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, marc fleury wrote:
Make something out of I robot. You boss. .. perhaps:
Others robot. JBoss.
native speakers: form up!
Holger
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The scripting and stylesheet extensions in pre-1_0-cleanup require a lot
of changes to the CGs:
o the component's ids have to be written to make the components
addressable by scripts
o the styles, that are defined in the component's attribute set are
written to the dynamic stylesheet.
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Holger Engels wrote:
sorry, wrong mailing list, wrong project, wrong audience ... ignore it
holger
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, marc fleury wrote:
Bill got my hear yesterday where he pitched the interceptor design on the 3.0 client
side.
Instant love.
We are not that far from it in fact, it a bit of renaming and factory game on the
server. Essentially the client does
Generic Proxy -
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Luke
Taylor
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] TODO: client side interceptors
olger Engels
On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Julian Gosnell wrote:
On running the WebIntegration test on a freshly built
Server (cvs updated about 12 hours ago) I get a :
javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException:
SingleJBoss:name=jbosstest-web.ear, J2EEServer=Single,
J2EEApplication=jbosstest-web.ear,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
Yes, this change has been in since the start of 2.4, and people have
complained about CacheKey showing up as a bottleneck since its
release. It started showing up even more dramtically in the pending
2.4.4 codebase due to some other change that is
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
See my previous email. This shouldn't happen if the relationship is
specified the right way.
Anyway, thanks for your good emails. You are one of the first users of the
new cmp 2.0 code, so anything you can tell us will help clean the system for
On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Glad to see it is working.
I didn't check, if foreign keys are actually written to the db, if I set
them in the ejbPostCreate method .. I think of, what Peter Levart posted
on this thread .. I'll get there soon.
But now, I have another
The following issues apply to foreign-key-mapping ..
1) problems with unidirectional relations:
deployment does not work, because the JDBCCMRFieldBridge.initRelatedData
does not find the related cmrField - throws DeploymentException
2) problems with not null constraints on foreign keys:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Lennart Petersson wrote:
I'm debugging through the code to see what is happening within JBoss and within our
beans to see where i can tune to get better performance. Using JBoss 2.4.0 final.
Can someone explain why we aren't returning m in this code snippet:
In class
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Andreas Schaefer wrote:
Hi Geeks
When a client of an EJB can use RMI to access an EJB is it
then also true that the EJB can use an RMI callback object
(sent by the client) to send information back to the client ?
No, that does only work in certain situations .. if
on
jars or also on standalone xml-files
o what else?
I've put my name behind some of those points. I'd like to see more names
behind the remaining tasks ..
BTW, where are the sources for the EjbJar ResourceManager? I only found
jBossEjbJar and decompiled the ejxejb.jar
Holger Engels
On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Wei-ju Wu wrote:
Hm, it is not the code that made me think of a complete
rewrite, it's (IMHO) its non-existence of usability and
user-friendliness which lies in its concept.
Furthermore, the advanced options of EJB 2.0 and
JBoss = 2.4 are not supported.
I think user
Sorry, I don't quite understand .. what was so bad about the ejx approach?
I recognized ejx as a _generic_ powerful, simply to use framework for
building xml-editors. I think, it would be a better idea, to build upon the
existing editors and make them more user friendly, verbose and fool prove.
.. the following should do it:
for f in `find src -name *.java`
do
sed 's/JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server/JBoss, the OpenSource J2EE webOS/g' $f $f.2
mv $f.2 $f
done
You can concatenate everything into one line, if you separate it with ;
If you dont't trust it (even I don't ;-), leave
36 matches
Mail list logo
