muy bien (my spanish half takes over during the war)
much needed simplifications.
2°) IMHO, way to many files exist in /deploy
This is counterintuitive for jboss-users: it may be fine for
jboss developers but I don't think it is ok for simple users.
Agreed
First suggestion: we add a new
Sacha,
Regarding #2, I find the current state of /deploy to be
highly intuitive, personally. Would it be possible to make
your scheme work by giving .sar's the ability to be nested?
That way, /deploy/JMS.sar (a directory) could contain
jms-foo.sar and jms-bar.sar.
That's already
Rather than a specialized SubDirSubDeployer, how about having the SAR
report multiple watch-urls?
Yes, that would be an idea.
It may also be possible to have the SAR start its own
URLDeploymentScanner for its content rather than explicitly sub-deploy
it. This would support automatic
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL]: clean conf/jboss-service.xml deploy
Rather than a specialized SubDirSubDeployer, how about having the SAR
report multiple watch-urls?
Yes, that would be an idea.
It may also be possible to have the SAR start its own
URLDeploymentScanner for its
Hello,
Currently, the content of conf/jboss-service.xml and deploy is not very
clean.
1°) Some services defined in conf/jboss-service.xml require services later
deployed in deploy
Exemples:
- the EJBDeployer depends on the JMS Pool
- some invokers (3.2+) require jboss-jca.jar
Hi Sacha!
I think this sounds very good, because it is as you said a bit
confusing with all these files in deploy and conf. To group them
together in JMS/JMX/... subdiroctories i think would be a good solution
and also having them apart from users application deployments - like
deploy/system
(a directory) could contain
jms-foo.sar and jms-bar.sar.
- Matt
-Original Message-
From: Sacha Labourey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 5:53 AM
To: Jboss-Dev
Subject: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL]: clean conf/jboss-service.xml deploy
Importance: Low
Hello,
Currently
The thing I care about most is ease of configurability
(which, for the most part, I think we already have). I like
the idea that I can add or remove functionality by adding or
removing modules from /deploy. Much of the functionality
of the server works this way (jmx-console, for
scanned URL the SAR's root.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sacha Labourey
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 6:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL]: clean
conf/jboss-service.xml deploy
The thing I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
5. multiple interceptor chains per
On 2003.03.09 15:20 Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David
Jencks
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
The AOP case is even more similar to the DP if you
think of AOP like this:
If the AOP intrumented methods are:
Interceptors are: []
The original (but renamed) object methods are: (
The object is: O
An AOP stack then is: [](O
Which is almost the same as the DP case: |[](O
Regards,
Hiram
If
, March 03, 2003 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
The AOP framework really right now is only for POJO
interception. I do have the beginnings of DynamicProxies
though. The AOP POJO framework can intercept static and
member
, #2, and #3a if I can focus solely on this for 5 days with
no interuptions.
OK I will guarantee the no interuptions. Get it fucking done and you
will put us all on top of the middleware world. JNDI is the simplest
test case as Scott pointed and something I wanted see done in a long
time
It makes some interceptors less complex to implement. It
makes sense at service interception where we may have a
separation between attributes/operations. Say I want to
persist 2 out of 3 attributes I'm changing. Operations don't
need the persistence interceptor, nor do all the
.
Thanks,
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott M Stark
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
Woa, before we have a full fledged interceptor
PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Nathan Phelps
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
I agree. As I begin the development of JMS/JBoss 4.0, I'm, frankly,
confused as to which direction to go concerning the interceptor
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott M Stark
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
Woa, before we have a full fledged interceptor war show up in main what
is the
status
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
On 2003.03.02 16:16 Nathan Phelps wrote:
I agree.
With what, specifically?
As I begin the development of JMS/JBoss 4.0, I'm, frankly,
confused
]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
On 2003.03.02 16:16 Nathan Phelps wrote:
I agree.
With what, specifically?
As I begin the development of JMS/JBoss 4.0, I'm, frankly,
confused as to which direction to go concerning the interceptor
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
And I'm saying I want a prototype that demonstrates how the
various interceptor
offerings work in the context of a real service. Part of the
testsuite for a given
interceptor framework needs to demonstrate
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Bill Burke wrote:
1. Source located in neutral territory, namely the common module.
ok
2. Sequence of interceptors determined by (iterator in) invocation object.
This could be a modifiable iterator at some point. This allows the
interceptor stack to be modified per
(resending, first attempt seems to have disappeared)
I've committed a proposal for a jboss-wide interceptor framework in the
common module under org.jboss.interception. This is based on Bill's aop
interceptor framework. It compiles but is untested. Several more or less
needed features are not
I've committed a proposal for a jboss-wide interceptor framework in the
common module under org.jboss.interception. This is based on Bill's aop
interceptor framework. It compiles but is untested. Several more or less
needed features are not yet implemented, such as a convenient way to
supply a
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:28 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
(resending, first attempt seems to have disappeared)
I've committed a proposal for a jboss-wide interceptor framework in the
common module under
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:28 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
(resending, first attempt seems to have disappeared)
I've committed
Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
No No!! War War War!!!
:-))
Actually I
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
Jeremy Boynes
Envoyé : mardi, 10 décembre 2002 19:03
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for changes to URL deployment to clean
up netboot
I have a prototype of the changes to SARDeployer ready to go. However, I
have run
OK. Good luck.
Cheers,
sacha
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de
Jeremy Boynes
Envoyé : mercredi, 11 décembre 2002 16:56
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for changes to URL deployment to clean
up netboot
.
getopt, gnu-regexp, log4j) but I realise that adding more is undesirable.
Thanks
Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sacha
Labourey
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 12:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal
tisdagen den 10 december 2002 kl 19.03 skrev Jeremy Boynes:
I lean toward A) as there are existing dependencies during boot (e.g.
getopt, gnu-regexp, log4j) but I realise that adding more is
undesirable.
Functionality is desired ... when 'one' dives in a prob on a moving xp
target - the 'one'
Boynes
Envoyé : dimanche, 8 décembre 2002 09:00
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for changes to URL deployment to clean
up netboot
Scott Stark wrote:
Sounds ok, but let see some more details. Show how you propose
to rewrite
SARDeployer.parseXMLClasspath using
-dev] Proposal for changes to URL deployment to
clean up netboot
Wanted to get feedback before starting to implement...
The current support for loading deployment units has several
special cases
to deal with loading from the network e.g. in
SARDeployer.parseXMLClasspath
PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for changes to URL deployment to clean up netboot
Scott Stark wrote:
Sounds ok, but let see some more details. Show how you propose to rewrite
SARDeployer.parseXMLClasspath using this helper framework.
I think bbtaining a URLLister should mirror
Wanted to get feedback before starting to implement...
The current support for loading deployment units has several special cases
to deal with loading from the network e.g. in
SARDeployer.parseXMLClasspath(), NetBootHelper.getDefaultListUrl() or even
HttpURLDeploymentScanner itself.
I would like
Wanted to get feedback before starting to implement...
;)
The current support for loading deployment units has several special
cases
to deal with loading from the network e.g. in
SARDeployer.parseXMLClasspath(), NetBootHelper.getDefaultListUrl() or
even
HttpURLDeploymentScanner itself.
Sir,
I crave your indulgence as I contact you in such a surprising manner. I respectfully
insist that you read this letter carefully, as I am optimistic that it will open doors
for unimaginable financial rewards for both of us.
I am very sorry for not introducing myself first. My name is
Sir,
I crave your indulgence as I contact you in such a surprising manner. I respectfully
insist that you read this letter carefully, as I am optimistic that it will open doors
for unimaginable financial rewards for both of us.
I am very sorry for not introducing myself first. My name is
Hello Scott,
But where on SF do you have a synthetized list of recent CVS commits? The
site simply says, in the CVS section, No CVS History Available.
Cheers,
Sacha
Seperate them as they can be merged by any decent mail client
if desired. Do we really need
That is true and it seems that SF will not be implementing the
cvs history feature.
But where on SF do you have a synthetized list of recent CVS commits? The
site simply says, in the CVS section, No CVS History Available.
Cheers,
Sacha
Seperate them as they can be merged by any
Ok,
now that I live in orbit and purely on the website forums it is true that the
cvs-commits are un-bearable. Also the volume of commits is about to go sky high as we
stabilize all the new features of jboss 3.0.
I know I have been against separating the two lists in the past but now I am
, 2002 10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Proposal: separate cvs update from Dev?
Ok,
now that I live in orbit and purely on the website forums it
is true that the cvs-commits are un-bearable. Also the
volume of commits is about to go sky high as we stabilize all
I think this is a great idea. It is not often that
you get to please
everyone. :)
In my case almost never really ]:)
__
View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums:
http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=6695
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 8:36 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Proposal: separate cvs update from Dev?
Ok,
now that I live in orbit and purely on the website forums it is true that
the cvs-commits are un-bearable. Also the volume of commits is about to go
sky high
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal: separate cvs update from Dev?
Seperate them as they can be merged by any decent mail client
if desired. Do we really need a cvs forum? This info is available
through a browser interface from sourceforge in a much more
sophisticated manner than
Hi,
I would like to add a small (well a big for me) feature to Entity EJB 1.1 in
CMP mode.
Dirk Zimmermann has already make some changes for that and I would like to
extend them.
I also would like your opinion on that.
We could call it "Nested Properties in CMP".
Current State
-
When
You might get this twice - or even 3 times - it seems sourceforge.net/the
mailing list is having trouble delivering my messages...
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: "Day, Jem BGI WAC" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You've probably already seen this but the ThoughtWorks guys
Hi,
Are there daily builds done of jboss?
Can I offer to do these (automatically of course).
This would include the following;
clean checkout of the latest code
build the code from scratch (from several modules), send an email to
jboss-dev if compile fails
if builds
hing
marc
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Kimpton,C (Chris)
|Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 5:36 AM
|To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds?
|
|
|Hi,
|
|Are there daily builds done of jboss?
|
|
|Can I o
|Kimpton,C (Chris)
|Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 5:36 AM
|To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds?
|
|
|Hi,
|
|Are there daily builds done of jboss?
|
|
|Can I offer to do these (automatically of course).
|
|This would include the following;
|
| clea
, 2001 10:15 AM
|To: marc fleury; Kimpton,C (Chris);
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds?
|
|
|I would be happy to help out with integrating the
|JUnit test stuff with a build/distribution... Just
|let me know...
|
|cheers,
|peter
|
|
|--- marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED
I'm glad that somebody has finally proposed this. If you need any help,
or don't have the time to do this, we can take it over. I've done this
sort of thing many times.
Regards,
Bill Burke
CommerceTone
Kimpton,C (Chris) wrote:
Hi,
Are there daily builds done of jboss?
Can I
Yes.
Sorry about dropping in and out. Hope I can be
forgiven. When consulting is slow jboss contribution
is high, when consulting is busy... you get the idea.
I'm still here!!
Summary:
JCTS is well developed with respect to Stateful and
Stateless session beans. BMP is also well developed
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 7:15 AM
To: marc fleury; Kimpton,C (Chris);
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds?
I would be happy to help out with integrating the
JUnit test stuff with a build/distribution... Just
let me know...
cheers,
peter
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:32 AM
|To: marc fleury; Kimpton,C (Chris);
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [PROPOSAL] daily builds?
|
|
|Yes.
|
|Sorry about dropping in and out. Hope I can be
|forgiven. When consulting is slow jboss contribution
|is high, when consu
56 matches
Mail list logo
