At 01:27 PM 12/22/2002 -0800, you wrote:
At the end it also
leads to the question if Marc or JBG can take JBoss, kick out all the
developers
and sell it. But I am not a layer and cannot answer the question.
Isn't all the code LGPL? It is theoretically possible to remove CVS access
to all the
Oh my, it is difficult to judge with only second hand information,
but I feel very annoyed about the (possible) mix of commercial
aspects (between JBG and Andy as a consultant) with developement
aspects.
But should cvs write access be the battlefield for this?
The jsr-77 issue is a separate
-
From: Michael Bartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye II
- Andy: please keep cool and stay online (I like EJB timers :-)
- Marc: consider developing and consulting as two different jboss ASPECTS.
Again, I fear I
. Marc
will take it up tomorrow.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Michael Bartmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 1:54 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Good
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye II
None of the JBG supporters has written everything by himself.
This is of course a matter of control and organization, which
you do very well as master of the tree. I wont let
is an
expression of Andy's personal gripes and bitterness. Period.
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Michael Bartmann
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye II
, 2002 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye II
None of the JBG supporters has written everything by himself.
This is of course a matter of control and organization, which
you do very well as master of the tree. I wont let
everybody do everything, but if somebody wants
When lawyers and law are involved, compromize is often impossible.
If you are working on a competing product at your day job and JBoss by
night, you risk infecting your employer's codebase with LGPL code, and
the JBoss code by proprietary code. I'm not saying you'd intentionally
do that, but
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy,
Do you own your own work anymore?
This is actually a key issue that everyone working on
this type of projejct should really be aware of. If
you are a permanent employee of a company in the USofA
which produces copyrightable material (such as
Hiram, you still have access! We need you man!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 2:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye
Yep.. i'd like to know the same
, 2002 7:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye
Hiram, you still have access! We need you man!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hiram
Chirino
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 2:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
why did they do that?
- Original Message -
From: Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:39 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye
Hi Geeks
Yesterday my CVS RW access to JBoss was revoked and therefore
I will not work on the JBoss
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Darrell
Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 12:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye
why did they do that?
- Original Message -
From: Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
13 matches
Mail list logo
