-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
5. multiple interceptor chains per
On 2003.03.09 15:20 Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David
Jencks
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 8:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
The AOP case is even more similar to the DP if you
think of AOP like this:
If the AOP intrumented methods are:
Interceptors are: []
The original (but renamed) object methods are: (
The object is: O
An AOP stack then is: [](O
Which is almost the same as the DP case: |[](O
Regards,
Hiram
If
, March 03, 2003 2:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
The AOP framework really right now is only for POJO
interception. I do have the beginnings of DynamicProxies
though. The AOP POJO framework can intercept static and
member
, #2, and #3a if I can focus solely on this for 5 days with
no interuptions.
OK I will guarantee the no interuptions. Get it fucking done and you
will put us all on top of the middleware world. JNDI is the simplest
test case as Scott pointed and something I wanted see done in a long
time
It makes some interceptors less complex to implement. It
makes sense at service interception where we may have a
separation between attributes/operations. Say I want to
persist 2 out of 3 attributes I'm changing. Operations don't
need the persistence interceptor, nor do all the
.
Thanks,
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott M Stark
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
Woa, before we have a full fledged interceptor
PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Nathan Phelps
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 4:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
I agree. As I begin the development of JMS/JBoss 4.0, I'm, frankly,
confused as to which direction to go concerning the interceptor
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott M Stark
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 1:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
Woa, before we have a full fledged interceptor war show up in main what
is the
status
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 2:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
On 2003.03.02 16:16 Nathan Phelps wrote:
I agree.
With what, specifically?
As I begin the development of JMS/JBoss 4.0, I'm, frankly,
confused
]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
On 2003.03.02 16:16 Nathan Phelps wrote:
I agree.
With what, specifically?
As I begin the development of JMS/JBoss 4.0, I'm, frankly,
confused as to which direction to go concerning the interceptor
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
And I'm saying I want a prototype that demonstrates how the
various interceptor
offerings work in the context of a real service. Part of the
testsuite for a given
interceptor framework needs to demonstrate
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Bill Burke wrote:
1. Source located in neutral territory, namely the common module.
ok
2. Sequence of interceptors determined by (iterator in) invocation object.
This could be a modifiable iterator at some point. This allows the
interceptor stack to be modified per
Woa, before we have a full fledged interceptor war show up in main what is the
status of the various JMX, AOP, etc interceptors and associated frameworks?
It seems like several people are running around writing this without demonstrating
how it applies to the existing services. A simple example is
No No!! War War War!!!
:-))
Actually I just wanted to get the discussion started early on and try to
get people involved since I think it will be a big undertaking to convert
all the interceptor models to a single one. I don't want to spring an
entire system conversion on anyone without a lot
Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Proposal for jboss-wide interceptor framework
No No!! War War War!!!
:-))
Actually I
17 matches
Mail list logo
