Yes indeed, many thanks. I need to retest since I made some additions
since the original commit.
Sorry for the delay on this, I've been having trouble connecting to cvs
today.
david jencks
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 03:05 PM, Adrian Brock wrote:
Hi David,
Did you forget to commit stylesh
Hi David,
Did you forget to commit stylesheets/JMSMDBTemplate.xsl?
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behal
We should be looking at jaxb driven by schemas for the metadata parsing before
considering the commons digester framework. I'm looking at jaxb for inclusion
in the 3.2 branch to address some stability issues.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xx
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Burke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:09 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb deployment
>
> I would rather have a sep
An mbean is still an object metamodel. Exposing this as an mbean is a seperate issue.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
>
> I'm not convinced we are, I am unconvinced anything more than mbeans is
> necessary. Configuring mbe
3 10:58 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb deployment
>
> Not sure I like this idea. Tell me why we need to support 3.2 and 3.0
> descriptors in 4.0? I'd much rather a 3.2 component crap out gracefully in
> 4.0 than have to maintain 3 separ
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
> deployment
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dain
> Sundstrom
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
> deployment
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dain
> Sundstrom
> Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 2:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
> deployment
>
>
&
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 12:36 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Why? Because everybody is very familiar with them. Why? because its
simple
and easy to maintain and modify. Yes, the XML parsing needs to be
moved to
a separate module, but the classes themselves have held up fine. I
will not
allow y
On Tuesday, June 17, 2003, at 12:58 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
Not sure I like this idea. Tell me why we need to support 3.2 and 3.0
descriptors in 4.0? I'd much rather a 3.2 component crap out
gracefully in
4.0 than have to maintain 3 separate configuration mechanisms.
I wish we could get rid of th
On Monday, June 16, 2003, at 10:57 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
David
Jencks
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 12:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
deployment
I'
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 12:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
> deployment
>
>
> I've modified the deployment system to a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott
> M Stark
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:35 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
> deployment
>
>
> T
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> Jencks
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb
> deployment
>
>
>
>
03 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XSLSubDeployer improvements and jca 1.5 mdb deployment
>
> On Monday, June 16, 2003, at 01:53 PM, Scott M Stark wrote:
>
> > This is not consistent with the move to extract the metadata parsing
> > from the current
> > deployers
On Monday, June 16, 2003, at 01:53 PM, Scott M Stark wrote:
This is not consistent with the move to extract the metadata parsing
from the current
deployers into filters or interceptors associated with the deployers.
The key issue is
to support transformation of multiple versions of the various
This is not consistent with the move to extract the metadata parsing from the current
deployers into filters or interceptors associated with the deployers. The key issue is
to support transformation of multiple versions of the various descriptors into metadata
used by the current deployer.
Conver
18 matches
Mail list logo
