I get the error below (at CMT commit time) when using the non-clustered combo
TreeCache 1.4.0cr2 / Hibernate 3.2.0cr2 / JBoss 4.0.4GA. When I switch to
pessimistic locking (replace OptimisticTreeCacheProvider with TreeCacheProvider
and NodeLockingScheme OPTIMISTIC by PESSIMISTIC), it all works w
Thanks in advance for any assitance.
Regards,
Ilan
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956698#3956698
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956698
-
Hello,
We have been testing our code with 1.4CR2. We have found that if we put an
object to the cahce with Transactions enabled the cache will thrown an
exception (liste bellow).
Glancing at the code it appears getCurrentTransaction is returning NULL when
the current thread has no transactio
Hi Ben,
it shows up on both nodes, but I do have RoundRobin in use for the SFSB. It
does not show up absoluteley simultaniously, one node starts shortly before the
other.
I am not sure, but I thought I rather mention it, just in case it is related.
(If not just ignore it). I still have a proble
Is this behavior of Fqn correct? If yes, shouldnt this be documented through
the javadocs?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956491#3956491
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956491
Sorry, posted in the wrong topic
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956490#3956490
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956490
--
Is this behavior of Fqn correct? If yes, shouldnt this be documented through
the javadocs?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956488#3956488
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956488
I will need additional log to see what's the problem. Pulling the cable should
have direct effect on the cluster group membership and the message replication
timeout (possibly).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956404#3956404
Reply to the post
Now are the errors showed up in both nodes or just the originating node?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956403#3956403
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956403
---
Anyone? I can't be the onlyone wondering how to set this up... Or am I??
K.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956368#3956368
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956368
Using Tomcat but need to
Even though it appears like I'm talking to myself it appears that my previous
method of doing things doesn't quite work, even after fixing the obvious bug so
that it reads:
| _serviceCache = new PojoCache( _channel ) {
| public void start() throws Exception {
|
Had a look at the test cases and the FqnTest.java does not have a test case
for this specific scenario. I added the following test case to the same:
/**
| * @testDesc Tests the [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fqn#equals(Object)} method. Two
Fqn will be created, one
| * will use the [E
Thanks, it worked (after multiple: 1. clean, 2.build 3.goto 1 again; eclipse
and ant after some attempts finally did what they should and it worked).
Unfourtunately there still is an error that shows up:
| ... //Server Start
| 13:35:47,062 INFO [STDOUT] I have been created by
de.somewhere
Please, ignore this entire topic. Had got confused with the concept of nodes
and keys. Eviction is working fine.
Sorry for the trouble
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956164#3956164
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=b
Tried a few more things and looks like eviction is working for attributes like
timeToLiveSeconds and maxAgeSeconds(if at all they are specified) but NOT
WORKING for maxNodes.
P.S.: While debugging LRUAlgorithm.java, observed that the following statement :
ne = (NodeEntry)recycleQueue_.poll(0);
Sorry, you were right.
The code inside the constructor is executed twice. My mistake.
regards
matabo
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956118#3956118
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956118
Hi,
Looks like the FQN created by passing a string and FQN created using
Fqn.fromString() are NOT *equal*. Here's a sample program:
package org.myapp;
|
| import org.jboss.cache.Fqn;
| import org.jboss.cache.PropertyConfigurator;
| import org.jboss.cache.TreeCache;
|
| /**
| * @
There are 2 JChannel.connect() calls, can you set a breakpoint in
JChannel.connect() (get the JGroups src) ? Then you could look at the call
stack and see *where* the connect() methods are called.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956111#3956111
I even introduced a time delay in putting the objects as follows, just to try
out whether eviction works. But still it does not work.
The following is just an extract from the above code, with *only* a
Thread.sleep(500) introduced.
for(int i=0;i<50;i++)
| {
|
|
Hi,
I am trying out a simple standalone app where i, put in 50 elements in the
cache at a given fqn. I have enabled EvictionPolicy and set the maxNodes as 5.
However none of the nodes are getting evicted. Here's the code and the config
file:
package org.myapp;
|
| import org.jboss.cache.
Maybe you're right, but then I ask you: what you mean with "another cluster"?
XML configuration file is the same in the two cases (stand alone program and
"inside Weblogic" program), and in my code I've one only "startService()"
invocation...
Maybe constructor method of the singleton is invoked
You apparently run another cluster, for a total of 2 in your WL instance
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956100#3956100
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3956100
Using Tomcat but need to do m
I'm running Jbosscache inside WebLogic 7; I have two Weblogic instance and I
reoplicate a state between them.
When I start, even ONLY ONE Weblogic instance, I see the following lines
displayed:
---
GMS: address is 1.5.28.121:4875
-
My application uses PojoCache (with jdk1.5 annotations). I have 2 cachable
classes: 1st class has some mamber variables (String, int) and ArrayList. The
ArrayList is filled with instances of the 2nd class.
I started the application on 2 machines, created my outer POJO, modified some
properties
This is restriction on the eviction queue that should be lifted in 1.4.
Workaround (and the proper solution) is to decrease your ThreadWakeUpInterval
from 5 to say 2 or 1 second.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3956045#3956045
Reply to the pos
"bingbingbing" wrote : Caused by: java.io.StreamCorruptedException: invalid
stream header
| at
java.io.ObjectInputStream.readStreamHeader(ObjectInputStream.java:737)
| at java.io.ObjectInputStream.(ObjectInputStream.java:253)
| at
org.jboss.invocation.MarshalledValueInputStream
For all who care I finally figured out a way to get this to work (which also
may point out a bug inside TreeCache).
First thing you have to do is create your JChannel before you create your
PojoCache. My earlier attempts (in my first message) extended the PojoCache to
expose the JChannel throug
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossCacheAndWebLogic
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955942#3955942
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3955942
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need
And when i use sourceRelative("aop.bsh"); in the BeanShell,it works fine only
can not properly work under my junit-testcase in eclipse.
best regards
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955904#3955904
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/ind
i use the jalapeno and want to test the example code(Person and Address).I
configured Person and Address in jboss-aop.xml and use the example
replSync-service.xml as configuration file.
then in my testcase the code is something like:
System.setProperty(Context.INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY,"org.jboss.c
Hi all,
I try to configure JBoss Cache with Weblogic. When i add jboss-jmx.jar to my
class path and start weblogic server i get following error message.
The WebLogic Server did not start up properly.
java.lang.NoSuchFieldError: loaders
at
com.sun.management.jmx.DefaultLoaderRepository.ad
Hi all,
Im trying to configure JBoss cach with Weblogic 8.1. Can any body send me
sample codes to perform this task.
Thankx in advance.
Indika
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955857#3955857
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.htm
Some additional research has shown that the TcpCacheServer stays in the
STARTING state after starting the JBoss AS. Am I missing some configuration
parameters or specific settings perhaps?
Kurt
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955804#3955804
Since some time - probably after switching to JBossCache 1.3.0 SP2 - we
sometimes get this warning:
2006-06-22 08:32:12,333 WARN [org.jboss.cache.interceptors.TxInterceptor] No
local transaction for this remotely originating rollback. Possibly rolling
back before a prepare call was broadcast?
Which was this 'relevant jar', just so I can update the JBossCache/WebLogic
wikipage accordingly?
Thanks,
Manik
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955768#3955768
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply
Hi there,
Some additional information about the question described above.
First you need to add a dependency to get rid of the error message about the
datasource. Adding the statement below in my HttpCache MBean definition solved
the dependency problem when you deploy both the mysql-ds.xml and
Sorry, of course: we use JBossCache 1.3.0SP2.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955749#3955749
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3955749
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web se
We are using JBossCache 1.0.3 SP2.
Today we had a situation, where a thread locked everything up. According to the
thread dump this was the guilty thread:
"TP-Processor17" daemon prio=1 tid=0x0885cb98 nid=0x7321 in Object.wait()
[7b103000..7b105228]
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Metho
All it needs actually is to re-compile the 4.0.4 source using the either
JBossCache 1.3 or 1.4.CR2 release. So if you can check out the latest 4.0 cvs
and build it (it has 1.4.CR1 already), you will be all set.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=39
It is in 1.4.CR2 under sourceforge for the JBoss Cache download.
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866&package_id=102339&release_id=428151
Look into the examples directory.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955742#3955742
R
Hello everybody,
I've searching around for the last two weeks trying to find a solution for the
following set-up. What I would like to achieve is a set-up where 4 JBoss
instances work together in a clustered environment. Two nodes are actually
serving client requests while two other nodes are
Hi ,
Got it working with both Pojo and Tree Cache.
I didnt notice that it was throwing this exception on the admin server
org.jboss.cache.statetransfer.StateTransferGenerator_1241] - failed initialing
state transfer byte[]
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/jboss/invocation/MarshalledValueOutput
Thanks for the clarification.
Can you tell me the location for these examples for downloading them.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955604#3955604
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3955604
Sorry to bother again, but I do have one more question.
Is there any workaround that I can implement into the 4.0.4.GA source, so that
when I build a version it will work with 1.4 ?
I had a look at the JBossCache sources (TreeCache, EvictionPolicy,
RegionManager, Region, Eviction,...) and at the
I'm currently developing a standalone APP that needs a mechanism by which
remote methods can be executed on individual servers in the cluster.
My initial attempt at this was to use the JGroups RpcDispatcher, but when I
used this class starting up other clusters in the node resulted in an except
Thank you Ben !
Sincerly
Marc
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955385#3955385
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3955385
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securi
anonymous wrote : I presume this is the default version of JBoss Cache that
comes with 4.0.3.SP1?
Yes.
anonymous wrote : Does your code use Hibernate directly or is this EJB3 entity
bean related?
It's using Hibernate directly.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=
Yes, for aopc, you will need this XML.
BTW, I have refactored the PojoCache examples to weave out the unnessary
dependecies. There is now a separate PojoCacheTasks.xml (for Ant targets) that
a user can take to customize to your own project setting mor easily. Feedback
is welcome when you have a
Marc,
I have found out why. Please go to this ejb3 post for details.
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=85914
Thanks,
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955313#3955313
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.h
It depends on your application. JBoss Cache is not a drop-in replacement for
stateful session beans in any way. If all your SFSBs do is maintain back-end
state for your applets, then they could be replaced with a cache service
(clustered or not) but you will still need some remoting to alow yo
a) We have an app with an applet interface. At periodic intervals the applet
goes to server and gets updated data and repaints.
On the server side now, there is a stateful session bean that holds the object
data painted by applet. Whenever there is a change to the data of objects held
by stat
I believe the issue is solved - but its only from my 1st impression (which is
enough for me for the moment)
There are multiple ways to read the content of the cache and some dont support
the isolation levels.
If you use cacheInstance.printDetails() you would get all the cache content -
commited
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Would http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-407
apply to your problem?
Hi manik, thanks for your quick reply,
I dont think it is direcly related to my problem as i am not doing any rollback
in my testcase. Also, I dont have a problem with nodes but with keys ( whi
Would http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-407 apply to your problem?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955021#3955021
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3955021
Using Tomcat but need to do
More information regarding my issue:
(+) The unexpected results happens even when configured as SERIALIZABLE.
(+) I am using jbosscache 1.3.0 so the following issue should have been fixed:
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-285
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?mo
Hi all,
I am trying to use tree-cache transactional feature, and it does not working as
my expectation [perhaps i got it all wrong...]. any help would be appreciate. I
will try to simplify the issue.
I start the cache with the following properties:
LOCAL
PESSIMISTIC
READ_COMMITED
(standalone or i
I presume this is the default version of JBoss Cache that comes with 4.0.3.SP1?
Does your code use Hibernate directly or is this EJB3 entity bean related?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3955005#3955005
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/
Essentially, calling methods starting with _ are internal and will not trigger
aspects such as replication, etc.
In future releases (from 2.0.0) these methods will be internalised and not be
accessible from the client API.
I normally don't recommend the DummyTransactionManager that comes with J
Download the src; look into build.xml, there is a gossip-service target there.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954832#3954832
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954832
Using Tomcat but need t
JBoss 4.0.3 sp1
I just tried to turn on the JBoss TreeCache in Hibernate. When Hibernate tries
to place an entry in the cache, I get a ClassNotFoundException. It appears
that the TreeCache can't find the classes that are inside of my ear. I am
using the jboss.cache:service=EJB3EntityTreeCach
Ok... I will try it and then discuss the outcome.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954769#3954769
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954769
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support w
Thats what even I was assuming
The example under annotated50 has aoppath element under aopc target which
specifies the path for jboss-aop.xml.
Is it necessary to provide this XML just as a directive to the aopc to check
for the new annotation marker
@org.jboss.cache.aop.annotation.PojoCacheable
Also, see
http://fisheye.jboss.com/viewrep/~raw,r=1.1/JBoss/JBossCache/docs/i18n.txt for
a guide to internationalising the docs.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954708#3954708
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=
+1. And you get lots of kudos on the docs and the jboss cache website as a
contributor. :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954707#3954707
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954707
Using To
No, I don't think so. I have had Xiaogang Cao and his team at hibernate.org.cn
translating my PojoCache article. But I don't believe the whole doc is
translated.
Send me an email (ben dot wang at jboss dot com) if you decide to go ahead. I
can do the review for you. :-)
-Ben
View the original
Hi all, I don't know if these documents have been translated to Chinese already
or not. If there is no Chinese version, I'm going to translate them.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954612#3954612
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.
Thanks bela for the quick reply.
I did download the JGroups source 2.3, but did not find the gossip-service
target that you had metioned. I downloaded it from
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=6081
Have I missed anything ?
"Deploy the SAR into JBoss.."
Are you talking a
In that case, can you send me your test such that I can take a look? ben do
wang at jboss dot com.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954576#3954576
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954576
Us
In this case, it may be easier to troubleshoot with just TreeCache.
For the TransactionManagerLookUpClass, can you change to
GenericTransactionManagerLookup? such that it can handle the WL tm properly?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954575#395
Not for the release 1.3 and 1.4.
In 2.0, it has additional interceptos and introduction that requires runtime
presence of the aop xml file but that is supposed to be internal (e.g., hiding
away from the user).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3
HI,
I am using JDK1.5
For Pojo Cache with annotations , Is the jboss-aop.xml required even if I use
aopc for compile time generation of aop classes.
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954471#3954471
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.
Yes the Tree Cache also produced the same error.
true
3
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954461#3954461
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954461
Using Tomcat but need to
Yep,
Just tried that, and it's working...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954297#3954297
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954297
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web servic
Hmmn, I do have the test case in the distro that covers this though. Did you
try just using Person instance to see if the replication works?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954256#3954256
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?mod
Yes, I believe getObject never obtains a lock from the root. Only the
inidividual update will trigger the appropriate lock.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954254#3954254
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting
On the first problem of your requirement, Brian has pretty much cover it. The
point is, if you don't care much about the exisiting POJO, then you can do
putObject on either node. Just to make sure, to do getObject() before you start
doing POJO update, e.g.,
| pojoA = cacheA.getObject("/test"
1. Download the JGroups source
2. Execute the gossip-service target, which will create a gossip-router.sar
3. Deploy the SAR into JBoss, this will create a GossipRouter as an MBean,
managed by JBoss
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954252#3954252
I'm a newbie. I was wonder if you could let me know how should I start the
gossip server from the JBossCache ?
Thanks a ton,
Amit Chhajed
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954250#3954250
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?modul
Hi,
I've got the following classes:
public class Person {
| protected String first_name;
| protected String last_name;
| ...
public class User extends Person {
| protected String username;
| protected String password;
| protected Device device;
| ...
public cla
Hi. Yeah, if I do:
cacheA.putObject("/test", pojoA);
pojoA1 = cacheB.getObject("/test");
pojoA1 would be null. With 1.4, however, pojoA1 is showing up, but its empty
(the values I assign to it before putting it in cacheA aren't there). Very odd
behavior, especially since I see the correct va
So if you do:
cacheA.putObject("/test", pojoA); // pojo attached on cache A
pojoA1 = cacheB.getObject("/test");
pojoA1 is null? You've definitely got something weird going on then. That's
just basic stuff. Not sure what to say about that :( Hopefully Ben will have
some idea.
Well, let's j
Ben and Brian,
First off, I'm sorry for the typo in my previous response. When running my
assertEquals() tests, I was actually running it on the re-retrieved POJO
objects (cachedPojoA, updatedPojoA, and updatedPojoB). Thank you for catching
that typo. :)
Good to know that doing a putObject()
Oh yes, the documentation makes it clear that those are not replicated; I was
just curious about the reasoning behind that (a customer asked and I couldn't
come up with entirely satisfactory answers).
For the static case, I agree that this shouldn't be the default. But as with
final, in simple
Is this the case in all current versions of PojoCache? 1.3.x and 1.4.x ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3954055#3954055
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3954055
Using Tomcat but need to do
It is stated in the documentaiton that currently neither final, transient, or
static fields are replicated.
To replicate static is really case dependent since it it a global variable.
Question is then how do we store it internally if there are multiple POJOs
stored in the cache? And this has i
Thanks for the quick answer.
Concerning final, I see that it makes no sense replicating final fields that
point to immutable objects (e.g. Strings). But when the referenced object is
mutable I might want to replicate changes to it, too.
Objects are mapped into the cache by reachability, but obj
final fields cannot be modified, so why replicate them ?
However, static fields *should* probably be replicated, what is the current
behavior ? Ben, Brian ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3953947#3953947
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.co
Hi,
can anybody give me a rationale for not replicating final and static fields in
PojoCache? I can think of some scenarios where there could be problems, but I'm
not sure why it is not even offered as an option.
I couldn't find an explanation in the documentation, on the wiki, or in the
forum
Is the TreeCache one also produced the same error as in PojoCache, for the
state transfer portion?
In additio, what is your initital state transfer timeout setting?
E.g.,
2
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3953874#3953874
Reply to the pos
michael,
Sorry that it wasn' clear before but I probably know where is the problem. You
are doing:
| cacheA.putObject("/test", pojoA); // pojo attached on cache A
|
| cacheB.putObject("/test", pojoB); // pojo attached on cache B as well
|
| pojoA.setBlah(xx); // will have problem he
No worries about long posts if the problem is complex :-) I was just too lazy
to read all the details.
I'm not sure if this was just a typo in the forum post, but in what you posted
the variable you assign when you call getObject() is not the one you are using
in your assertions. "cachedPojoA
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your response (and sorry for the verboseness of the previous posts).
=)
I'm actually getting the object from the cache each time using the getObject()
call.
// Put object in CacheA and then replace it in CacheB
| MerchantDailyAccount pojoA = new MerchantDailyAccount(1)
I'm late to this thread, so please forgive if I miss something stated earlier
in all of the above :-)
First, the "Suppressing invocation" message is completely normal. The cache
itself (as opposed to the interceptor stack) doesn't actually do anything on a
commit() call, so the CallInterceptor
So, I tried what you suggested, and here's what I see in the logs. In
particular, I'm seeing a message on Server B (the server replicated to) that
says:
Suppressing invocation of method
commit(GlobalTransaction:<192.168.1.174:33972>:1) on cache.
Could this be the problem, and if so, what co
The SFSB should be on its way to you !
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3953759#3953759
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3953759
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services
Please send me your "Hello World" sfsb then. ben dot wang at jboss dot com. I
will give it a try to see what is different.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3953644#3953644
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&
Strange, I just tried it with an 4.0.4CR2 Out-of-the-Box's "all" and the
1.4.0Cr1 and a "HelloWorld" SFSB and up the error came.
I for this I did use a 4.0.4CR2 that has been out for a while, files are dated
first of April 06... not that I am missing something here. The sources that I
use to co
I dont think 1.4CR2 is that different. Can you try it out from AS4.0-ejb3 out
of the box though. That should tell you right away.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3953627#3953627
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=p
Hmmn... looks like replication is happening and you have field replication as
well.
How about you do it the regular way: starting A and B, then do a putObject on A
then do a getObject from B?
Check the log file as well.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=vie
Yes, I have a modified \deploy\ejb3.deployer\META-INF\jboss-service.xml so that
we can use the http-invoker-servlet.
This is the changed line:
...
| servlet://mc0430-116:8080/servlet-invoker/ServerInvokerServlet
| ...
|
Also we have modified the
| "org.jboss.ejb3.stateful.StatefulCluste
1 - 100 of 2484 matches
Mail list logo
